Potential Transfer Ban

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Potential Transfer Ban

Postby Bluez » Fri Apr 18, 2014 3:44 pm

Chevrolet are about to start a 53 mil per year deal with Utd. Our 35 mil per year deal with Ethiad is beginning to look like a bargain for Ethiad. No way that can be considered not market price.
Light travels faster than sound.
Thats why some people appear bright until they open their mouth.

DISCLAIMER- My views are mine alone, and probably rubbish anyway.
User avatar
Bluez
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5436
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:16 pm
Location: On the Edge of Insanity

Re: Potential Transfer Ban

Postby JamieMCFC » Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:56 pm

Bluez wrote:Chevrolet are about to start a 53 mil per year deal with Utd. Our 35 mil per year deal with Ethiad is beginning to look like a bargain for Ethiad. No way that can be considered not market price.


Why?
JamieMCFC
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2034
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:40 pm
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: Potential Transfer Ban

Postby dario2739 » Fri Apr 18, 2014 9:22 pm

Wooders wrote:
Trouble is Beef is that it is not the size of the deal but the nature of it which is being looked at - they believe that Etihad/quatari sponsors have direct links with the owners of the club and they have deemed that an ffp back door


We are owned by one of Abu Dahbi's royalty - that fact and the exposure he is giving Abu Dahbi globally makes us a very attractive prospect for sponsorship by businesses from that country... The rags are owned by Yanks and they've got a huge deal with an American car firm - Is that not the same thing?!?
User avatar
dario2739
Horlock's Aggressive Walk
 
Posts: 560
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 9:51 am

Re: Potential Transfer Ban

Postby JamieMCFC » Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:06 pm

dario2739 wrote: We are owned by one of Abu Dahbi's royalty - that fact and the exposure he is giving Abu Dahbi globally makes us a very attractive prospect for sponsorship by businesses from that country... The rags are owned by Yanks and they've got a huge deal with an American car firm - Is that not the same thing?!?


No it's not the same thing. The Glazer's only link to Chevy is being from the same country. Which is a lot different than Mansour's brother being the chairman of Eithad.
JamieMCFC
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2034
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:40 pm
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: Potential Transfer Ban

Postby Dronny » Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:19 pm

Hutch's Shoulder wrote:My bet is we get a fine, pay it and everything carries on as normal.


That's a giggle as well, EUFA...."Lets put the mockers on all these upstarts with shit loads of money, we can threaten them with expulsion etc, etc and if that fails we can...........fine them"
Image
User avatar
Dronny
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3963
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 10:08 am
Location: On my arse at my pc
Supporter of: The one and only
My favourite player is: Colin Bell

Re: Potential Transfer Ban

Postby zuricity » Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:28 pm

JamieMCFC wrote:
No it's not the same thing. The Glazer's only link to Chevy is being from the same country. Which is a lot different than Mansour's brother being the chairman of Eithad.


Oh i don't know . The rags are morally Bankrupt, extracting as much out of disasters . Owned by the Glazers who are almost Financially bankrupt , bleeding money out of the Swamp. Whilst General Motors actually did go bankrupt needing a goverment bailout to continue. Three great examples of how Capitalism and free enterprise operates.
They are all Bankrupt in some way or other.

They've milked every connection over the years from goverment funding stands for the World cup to the abbatoir and back.

Mind, i'll get slaughtered for writing this :-)
zuricity
Joe Corrigan's Gloves
 
Posts: 16953
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch

Re: Potential Transfer Ban

Postby JamieMCFC » Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:28 pm

zuricity wrote:
JamieMCFC wrote:
No it's not the same thing. The Glazer's only link to Chevy is being from the same country. Which is a lot different than Mansour's brother being the chairman of Eithad.


Oh i don't know . The rags are morally Bankrupt, extracting as much out of disasters . Owned by the Glazers who are almost Financially bankrupt , bleeding money out of the Swamp. Whilst General Motors actually did go bankrupt needing a goverment bailout to continue. Three great examples of how Capitalism and free enterprise operates.
They are all Bankrupt in some way or other.

They've milked every connection over the years from goverment funding stands for the World cup to the abbatoir and back.

Mind, i'll get slaughtered for writing this :-)


I agree on the rags being morally bankrupt. As far as the American car industry I want go into what I think there biggest problem has been. I've had heated debates with my dad who worked for Chrysler and was a union rep.
JamieMCFC
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2034
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:40 pm
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: Potential Transfer Ban

Postby zuricity » Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:47 pm

JamieMCFC wrote:
I agree on the rags being morally bankrupt. As far as the American car industry I want go into what I think there biggest problem has been. I've had heated debates with my dad who worked for Chrysler and was a union rep.


Ronald Regan, stopped a change in the laws for gas guzzlers, introduced by Jimmy Carter to reduce the dependence on petrol and foreign oil imports. To impose a consumption tax.

This signalled to Detroit that they could continue producing 5,6 even higher liter engines sometimes with v8, v10 ,v12 blocks.

Gaz guzzlers after this change in 1986 i think, continued and no fines were made, because of Regan . This meant Detroit carried on producing inefficient sometimes very ugly and poor quality cars and trucks.
Meanwhile Honda particularly and Toyota and Nissan cleaned up with more modern and efficient cars. The consumption tax was repealed .
The japanese took over the us car market.

GM in their arrogance continued producing poor quality cars at high prices ( not just labor costs), and technically not bankrupt were bailed out by the government, similar to how Communism works.

If the US truly was a free market economy neither Chrysler or GM would exist today as we know them. Indeed look at what has happened to Detroit itself , never mind the car companies.

All of this doesn't belong on a footy forum though.btw i used some american english words here.
zuricity
Joe Corrigan's Gloves
 
Posts: 16953
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch

Re: Potential Transfer Ban

Postby gillie » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:04 pm

When will we find out what/if any punishment we will get for breaches of FFP?
User avatar
gillie
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Pablo Zabaleta's Manc Accent
 
Posts: 13889
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:55 pm
Location: our house
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Colin Bell

Re: Potential Transfer Ban

Postby nottsblue » Sun Apr 20, 2014 6:06 am

gillie wrote:When will we find out what/if any punishment we will get for breaches of FFP?


A week before next season starts most probably
nottsblue
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 29875
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: Nottingham
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun

Re: Potential Transfer Ban

Postby ruralblue » Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:39 am

Sports Direct!
ruralblue
Bert Trautmann's Neck
 
Posts: 12023
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 2:27 pm
Supporter of: MANCHESTER CITY
My favourite player is: KOMPANY / SILVA

Re: Potential Transfer Ban

Postby Original Dub » Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:48 am

I hope our punishment isn't too much for having loads of money.

I may as well sound like a child if that's what the governing body sounds like...
Original Dub
 

Previous

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AFKAE, carolina-blue, city72, dick dastardley, Dubciteh, Harry Dowd scored, john@staustell, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mase, rosbif cuisson 'bleu', salford city, Sparklehorse and 855 guests