Page 1 of 2
Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 7:04 am
by john@staustell
It seems Sam wants to do everything he can to prevent City getting the title and hand it to Liverpool and the cry'baby.
Yet it seems he didn't do much to stop Liverpool taking 6 points off them.
Why should he have this attitude? Doesn't mind losing to Liverpool but will do everything he can to stop City (not much admitedly!)
(Could be that Notts Co thrashing all those years ago!!!)
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 7:17 am
by Wooders
Sacked after the newcastle game (elano free kick one)
I think he may have also been sacked directly after playing us either before or after for anither club as well - can't think at the mo
Looks like he'll be getting sacked again now !
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 7:29 am
by City64
We are champions elect . West Ham are shite ! We cruised past them nine fucking one on aggregate in the league cup and hammered them away in the league . Fat cunt Alladyce is always full of shit , he talks it up but the West Ham fans have had enough of him ...... Dead man walking so he is bigging up his mate Rodgers and scousepool looking for allies before he gets the sack (again) . It's so easy to see the bitterness out there against MCFC , all the little cliques that exist in the game ! Hey ho fuck em we are top dogs lets all enjoy the ride and the good times that thankfully have come along in our lifetimes . CTID ;-)
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 7:49 am
by Breks
City64 wrote:We are champions elect . West Ham are shite ! We cruised past them nine fucking one on aggregate in the league cup and hammered them away in the league . Fat cunt Alladyce is always full of shit , he talks it up but the West Ham fans have had enough of him ...... Dead man walking so he is bigging up his mate Rodgers and scousepool looking for allies before he gets the sack (again) . It's so easy to see the bitterness out there against MCFC , all the little cliques that exist in the game ! Hey ho fuck em we are top dogs lets all enjoy the ride and the good times that thankfully have come along in our lifetimes . CTID ;-)
It was 9-0 on aggregate and that has no baring on this game at all.
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 7:50 am
by Peter Doherty (AGAIG)
Let's hope we put enough goals past them that Fatty feels the need to take time out to be alone with his collection of meat and potato pies....
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 7:54 am
by Socrates
Just making it crystal clear now that I utterly refuse to contemplate this pie-munching, Celine Dion-loving, scouse-licking darts player costing us the title. It is not happening, end of fucking story.
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 7:55 am
by City64
Breks wrote:City64 wrote:We are champions elect . West Ham are shite ! We cruised past them nine fucking one on aggregate in the league cup and hammered them away in the league . Fat cunt Alladyce is always full of shit , he talks it up but the West Ham fans have had enough of him ...... Dead man walking so he is bigging up his mate Rodgers and scousepool looking for allies before he gets the sack (again) . It's so easy to see the bitterness out there against MCFC , all the little cliques that exist in the game ! Hey ho fuck em we are top dogs lets all enjoy the ride and the good times that thankfully have come along in our lifetimes . CTID ;-)
It was 9-0 on aggregate and that has no baring on this game at all.
Yes it does .
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 7:56 am
by Breks
City64 wrote:
Yes it does .
How?
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 8:04 am
by City64
Breks wrote:City64 wrote:
Yes it does .
How?
Maybe you will work it out .
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 8:05 am
by Plain Speaking
With all the hate he has received from West Ham fans, he probably thinks beating us offers him a chance of proving his worth and surviving. He will have them fired up to park the bus and push and barge at set pieces. We need to be patient and give such support that it intimidates the West Ham players. This game will be like a cup final for both teams. BFS probably believes his future depends on it?
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 8:06 am
by Breks
City64 wrote:
Maybe you will work it out .
Basically you don't know. It has no baring on this game. It's a different day so previous results mean nothing.
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 8:21 am
by gary james
He's never really liked City. In years gone by, even before the 'money' he seemed to criticise, so don't expect any favours. Important City go out there and treat this like our biggest rival for the title instead of a team with nothing to play for. I'm confident we'll do it but Sam would love to spoil he party. He's a big mate of Fergie as well!
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 8:24 am
by City64
Breks wrote:City64 wrote:
Maybe you will work it out .
Basically you don't know. It has no baring on this game. It's a different day so previous results mean nothing.
If you say so . Maybe you can't read ?
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 8:48 am
by Alioune DVToure
Wooders wrote:Sacked after the newcastle game (elano free kick one)
I think he may have also been sacked directly after playing us either before or after for anither club as well - can't think at the mo
Looks like he'll be getting sacked again now !
I'm pretty sure he was still manager later that season when we went there and, with Corluka doing his best Xabi Alonso impression, beat them 2-0. Gelson bagged one and (I think) Ireland the other.
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 9:59 am
by avoidconfusion
The more West Ham will try to win the game the better for us I reckon.
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 10:03 am
by Wooders
avoidconfusion wrote:The more West Ham will try to win the game the better for us I reckon.
Absolutely - we're probably the best in the league fir hitting on the break
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 10:13 am
by zuricity
The thing that i find quite annoying about all this is that when Villa played against scouse2 , they didn't play with a back 6 . Other teams have done this too against us. If i was a Villa fan i would be embarrassed if my team played that way.
If the 'ammers do the same. It suggests to me that there are agendas against City. Why would a team ,having nothing to lose, like whu , not come out and try to win the game, rather than try not to lose ?Try to entertain the crowd.
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 10:15 am
by PeterParker
I think his job is on the line.
Not City, but his contract with WHU.
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 11:04 am
by Mikhail Chigorin
Socrates wrote:Just making it crystal clear now that I utterly refuse to contemplate this pie-munching, Celine Dion-loving, scouse-licking darts player costing us the title. It is not happening, end of fucking story.
I think that someone, somewhere has to love Celine Dion (I shudder at the thought) so it might as well be Big Fat Sam. This can then be added to his overall list of 'crimes' against common sense and decency, footballing or otherwise.
If it were ever decided that ugliness would be abolished from tomorrow onwards, he would have been disposed of yesterday.
Re: Fat Sam biased?

Posted:
Sat May 10, 2014 11:11 am
by Evenmydoghatesunited
Laughed out loud when i read his daft comments this morning. Apparently Stevie Gerrard has "won everything in the game but hasnt quite won the League". What the hell is he talking about? Youve either won it or not won it. There is no nearly or half won it element to it.