Slim wrote:Not one mention in the article about his reliability or fitness or even the remotest hint of looking at it from Pellers view.
Balanced journalism at its finest.
AntMcfc wrote:Good to see that people have finally realised I was right about Jovetic.
Nigels Tackle wrote:AntMcfc wrote:Good to see that people have finally realised I was right about Jovetic.
did you say that he's a quality footballer?
AntMcfc wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:AntMcfc wrote:Good to see that people have finally realised I was right about Jovetic.
did you say that he's a quality footballer?
No he's an absolute fraud.
Slim wrote:AntMcfc wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:AntMcfc wrote:Good to see that people have finally realised I was right about Jovetic.
did you say that he's a quality footballer?
No he's an absolute fraud.
We had people saying that when he signed, and you didn't register for another 3 months, are you aware time is linear and only works in one direction?
Ted Hughes wrote:I don't think Jovetic has been a success at City, but equally he has not been a failure either.
He was injured a lot last season. Less than most of our other attackers this season.
He doesn't lose the ball any more than the other forwards, as people are accusing him of, & this season he scores at a higher rate per minutes on the pitch, than Dzeko or Bony. He is also correct in his claims that he played a part in getting us through to the qualifying stages, & when he retires, he will probably be able to look back on a much more effective career in Eurpoean games than Dzeko.
Interesting piece from Scholes the other day talking about how if he didn't take risks & try stuff in games, Ferguson used to drop him.
People complain that we play too many safe passes, then we get a bloke who tries stuff, & a decent amount of it results in goals or efforts on goal, & we slag him off for it.
We have gone for Dzeko because he is the safe option, which is fair enough, but it's not deserved. Jovetic deserves to be in the squad; he's right.
Slim wrote:AntMcfc wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:AntMcfc wrote:Good to see that people have finally realised I was right about Jovetic.
did you say that he's a quality footballer?
No he's an absolute fraud.
We had people saying that when he signed, and you didn't register for another 3 months, are you aware time is linear and only works in one direction?
Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Slim wrote:AntMcfc wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:AntMcfc wrote:Good to see that people have finally realised I was right about Jovetic.
did you say that he's a quality footballer?
No he's an absolute fraud.
We had people saying that when he signed, and you didn't register for another 3 months, are you aware time is linear and only works in one direction?
Is that another one of those oblique pop music references?
Slim wrote:Ted Hughes wrote:I don't think Jovetic has been a success at City, but equally he has not been a failure either.
He was injured a lot last season. Less than most of our other attackers this season.
He doesn't lose the ball any more than the other forwards, as people are accusing him of, & this season he scores at a higher rate per minutes on the pitch, than Dzeko or Bony. He is also correct in his claims that he played a part in getting us through to the qualifying stages, & when he retires, he will probably be able to look back on a much more effective career in Eurpoean games than Dzeko.
Interesting piece from Scholes the other day talking about how if he didn't take risks & try stuff in games, Ferguson used to drop him.
People complain that we play too many safe passes, then we get a bloke who tries stuff, & a decent amount of it results in goals or efforts on goal, & we slag him off for it.
We have gone for Dzeko because he is the safe option, which is fair enough, but it's not deserved. Jovetic deserves to be in the squad; he's right.
Not sure who's slagging him off, well apart from fake Ant, but it's clearly a logistics problem. Having played three weeks without a striker, I think Dzeko is the safer option fitness-wise and that's the start and end of the reasons behind the choice.
If he wants to throw a hissy and chuck his toys from the pram then that's up to him, but if I wasn't a complete moron who was ruled entirely by my self-victimization I'd probably say "fair enough boss, I see your point".
WHAT HE DESERVES???
WHAT HE FUCKING DESERVES???
11 goals in 32 appearances over 2 years, he hasn't proven fuck all to City, to Pellers or to the footballing world.
69 goals in 172 appearances over 5 years....no no, you deserve to be ahead of this guy.
96 goals in 148 appearances over 4 years...may as well say you deserve to be ahead of this guy too.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: BlueinBosnia, Bluemoon4610 and 69 guests