Page 1 of 2

Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 4:11 pm
by Cocacolajojo1
...you can't really argue why

Kevin Nolan. I have no idea what it is and I get the impression that he's not a very pleasurable guy to talk to, but... I don't know, I just think he's kinda good. Not City good deffo top 7 good, perhaps not this season but deffo a couple of seasons back. I can't really explain why I have this opinion.

Anyone else?

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 4:27 pm
by Mase
Always liked Michael Brown.

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 5:46 pm
by nottsblue
Joseph Barton had the potential to be a good player. Shame he is a dickhead

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:21 pm
by roblues
Andi Weimann is someone who has shown a little bit of skill in a couple of games against us and, until I think about it and look at his general performances and output, my brain has decided he is a decent player.

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:35 pm
by South Stand Balti
I always thought Laurent Charvet was a good player but everyone else in the stadium thought he was useless. I could never tell why but I was in a minority of one so I must have been wrong. As for Nolan and Barton....they both have the same problem, just not quick enough.

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:37 pm
by Im_Spartacus
South Stand Balti wrote:I always thought Laurent Charvet was a good player but everyone else in the stadium thought he was useless. I could never tell why but I was in a minority of one so I must have been wrong. As for Nolan and Barton....they both have the same problem, just not quick enough.


I was similar with Paul Ritchie. I never understood why he didn't get a chance

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 7:00 pm
by roblues
Im_Spartacus wrote:
South Stand Balti wrote:I always thought Laurent Charvet was a good player but everyone else in the stadium thought he was useless. I could never tell why but I was in a minority of one so I must have been wrong. As for Nolan and Barton....they both have the same problem, just not quick enough.


I was similar with Paul Ritchie. I never understood why he didn't get a chance


I recall Charvet having one good game in the Championship under Keegan. Not sure I can remember one for Ritchie.

Does Jovetic count?

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 7:06 pm
by mr_nool
Kevin Davies, Mark Noble, Huddlestone, Lee Cattermole.

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 7:12 pm
by nottsblue
Henderson has a bit of potential. Mauricio Gaudino I always thought tasty. Darren bent always seems to score wherever he plays

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:31 pm
by South Stand Balti
Barry Silkman. He was brilliant or a few games. Proper skilfull then disappeared?

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:44 pm
by Pretty Boy Lee
Yaya toure.

On the subject of Nolan in years gone by he's managed to grab quite a few goals for his teams without being a fancied player or out and out attacker. He's been a cracking fantasy player. I agree he's pretty good.

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 9:51 pm
by Mikhail Chigorin
Papisse Cisse but, in all fairness, I feel he's just someone who is wayward, inconsistent and flatters to deceive.

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 9:52 pm
by sheblue
Jack colback.

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:24 pm
by Piccsnumberoneblue
Noble and Hiddleatone are good examples.
Brunt at WBA is similar.

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 2:45 am
by Tokyo Blue
Grealish at Villa. Though I always thought Marc Albrighton could have been a lot better than he became.

At City, I thought Jim Whitley could have developed into a good player.

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:20 am
by Slim
Kyle walker, but I think I'm alone with that.

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:51 am
by Mase
Don't think half the people that have replied to the OP understand what his actual question was.

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:52 am
by Mase
Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:Noble and Hiddleatone are good examples.
Brunt at WBA is similar.


These are perfect examples. Always liked Noble. Brint is a good one.

Another for me is Liam Ridgewell.

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:58 am
by Cocacolajojo1
On the subject of Nolan in years gone by he's managed to grab quite a few goals for his teams without being a fancied player or out and out attacker. He's been a cracking fantasy player. I agree he's pretty good.


Right?! He was imperative for when Newcastle came back from 0-4 to 4-4 against Arsenal a few years back, both in his presence on the field and his actual play. For example. I kind of like him.

Re: Players you think are good but...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 7:00 am
by Cocacolajojo1
Don't think half the people that have replied to the OP understand what his actual question was.


Well if that's the case, I can only say that that's usually the case, so can't really be blamed on them.

So, I was asking for players that you like but if you'd have to argue the case, you wouldn't really be able to do so.