The mancityfans.net football forum

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:

DoomMerchant wrote:

PrezIke wrote:

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Can anyone explain why Vazquez didn't get a red card for that disgusting challenge on Sterling? He's lucky his ankle didn't snap.

Horrific. I thought it was on his shin, and thought that could have been broken.

When you rely on a ref with a poor position to consider a red card against Madrid in their home stadium in a CL semi final then you're really grasping at straws. That would never happen.

We were shit and deserved to lose.

Sterling did more in 20 mins than Aguero in 90.

Cheers

Who's relying on a ref? Just questioning an incident within the game, that's fair is it not?

I dunno why you and I are on an accidental retard collision course.

I'm just saying trotting out your "we could have done something if we got the right call and a sending off" is bollox.

Anyway. Enjoy your day.

Cheers

That would be all well and good if I actually said anything like that Doomie.

5 of his 9 league goals have won us points this season, including a 97 min winner vs Bournemouth and a 96 min winner today

4 of his 9 league goals came in the 84th min or later

phips wrote:5 of his 9 league goals have won us points this season, including a 97 min winner vs Bournemouth and a 96 min winner today

Already been discussed in the other Raheem thread.

Mase wrote:

phips wrote:5 of his 9 league goals have won us points this season, including a 97 min winner vs Bournemouth and a 96 min winner today

Already been discussed in the other Raheem thread.

Great post, saved me from having to write one.

Cocacolajojo wrote:

Mase wrote:

phips wrote:5 of his 9 league goals have won us points this season, including a 97 min winner vs Bournemouth and a 96 min winner today

Already been discussed in the other Raheem thread.

Great post, saved me from having to write one.

Read the site rules lad. Phips doesn't want the board cluttered up with threads that have already been started nearly two years ago. To think a few other threads on Raheem have been created lately is a travesty. Come on boys read them rules!

Anyway they were all tap ins!

Mostly tap ins.

Nothing to see here...

Nice

www.skysports.com/football/news/11679/1 ... underrated

Original Dub wrote:Nice

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... underrated

it was all going well until i saw sterling sitting below emile hesky on that U24 list of goals/assists!

Happy Birthday Raheeeeeeeeeem, now go and smash the rags bastards tomorow

Original Dub wrote:Nice

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... underrated

“let alone one who was about to be transferred for £50m”

They really are thick as fuck aren’t they. They don’t understand the difference between £44 million and £50 million...

Mase wrote:

Original Dub wrote:Nice

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... underrated

“let alone one who was about to be transferred for £50m”

They really are thick as fuck aren’t they. They don’t understand the difference between £44 million and £50 million...

The fact that our players' price tags always include every possible add on in the media and the rag players are always quoted on the initial fee says it all on that front mate.

Original Dub wrote:

Mase wrote:

Original Dub wrote:Nice

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... underrated

“let alone one who was about to be transferred for £50m”

They really are thick as fuck aren’t they. They don’t understand the difference between £44 million and £50 million...

The fact that our players' price tags always include every possible add on in the media and the rag players are always quoted on the initial fee says it all on that front mate.

Heard the fee for Sane quoted as £46m the other day. Not the £37m that was announced as the actual transfer fee at the time and for the last year.

nottsblue wrote:

Original Dub wrote:

Mase wrote:

Original Dub wrote:Nice

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... underrated

“let alone one who was about to be transferred for £50m”

They really are thick as fuck aren’t they. They don’t understand the difference between £44 million and £50 million...

The fact that our players' price tags always include every possible add on in the media and the rag players are always quoted on the initial fee says it all on that front mate.

Heard the fee for Sane quoted as £46m the other day. Not the £37m that was announced as the actual transfer fee at the time and for the last year.

And I heard kdb quoted at £66m

Mase wrote:

phips wrote:have barrels of petrol cash to spend.

Sometimes I wonder if you're genuinely a City fan

Funny.

But the thread is a brilliant read.

Eh... BUMP

Original Dub wrote:

Mase wrote:

phips wrote:have barrels of petrol cash to spend.

Sometimes I wonder if you're genuinely a City fan

Funny.

But the thread is a brilliant read.

Eh... BUMP

You really dug that fucker up mate.

I hear Raheem is asking for Messi type wages, plus a little extra to sort his family out, but is he really worth a million a week?

Beefymcfc wrote:

Original Dub wrote:

Mase wrote:

phips wrote:have barrels of petrol cash to spend.

Sometimes I wonder if you're genuinely a City fan

Funny.

But the thread is a brilliant read.

Eh... BUMP

You really dug that fucker up mate.

I hear Raheem is asking for Messi type wages, plus a little extra to sort his family out, but is he really worth a million a week?

He won't get it anywhere else.... Somebody needs to remind Razzer how much Lionel was earning at his age? Would be interesting to do a performance comparison at the same age too? Sure Razzer was outstanding last season but iirc he is already behind compared to where he was after four games last season?

CTID Hants wrote:

Beefymcfc wrote:

Original Dub wrote:

Mase wrote:

phips wrote:have barrels of petrol cash to spend.

Sometimes I wonder if you're genuinely a City fan

Funny.

But the thread is a brilliant read.

Eh... BUMP

You really dug that fucker up mate.

I hear Raheem is asking for Messi type wages, plus a little extra to sort his family out, but is he really worth a million a week?

He won't get it anywhere else.... Somebody needs to remind Razzer how much Lionel was earning at his age? Would be interesting to do a performance comparison at the same age too? Sure Razzer was outstanding last season but iirc he is already behind compared to where he was after four games last season?

He’s scored two already and was benched in at least one game. My memory sucks but I know thag haha.

This is such a storm in a teacup to me. The press have it in for Sterling and after years of every other fan around the world lapping up the negativity we’ve finally been caught up in it too. Ignore the press and wait til the club say something about him.

I agree with PBL..we should all keep our own council on the sterling contract delay and support him till further notice....wait until the club speaks out and then we can have our say.

A mill a week