Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby john@staustell » Thu Jul 09, 2015 1:14 pm

Dont normally like talking about 'them'. But I found this article both interesting and amusing. Our superb modern thinking against the wooly 90s-entrenched shambles over the way.

http://www.espnfc.co.uk/barclays-premie ... ndy-mitten?

Through peaks and troughs, Manchester United's youth system has long instilled pride in the club's fans.

United have long been able to buy some of football's finest talents, but they have also created some of its greatest, from The Busby Babes in the 1950s to George Best a decade later and the Class of '92, which featured the likes of David Beckham and Paul Scholes.

Four of United's top five all-time appearance makers -- Ryan Giggs, Scholes, Bill Foulkes and Gary Neville -- started and finished their football life at Old Trafford, while it has become a well-used, but worth repeating, statistic that the club have had a youth product in the match day for 3,740 consecutive games, dating back to the end of World War Two.

Fans still eagerly watch for exciting emerging players and access to games through improved media has made that easier, but the current youth system at the Cliff and Carrington training grounds gives cause for concern.

There are promising young professionals who'll make a good career in football but the dynamics have changed. The competition for talent has increased and United simply aren't as appealing to the best young players as they once were.

First team manager Louis van Gaal has no reason to say so publicly but he sees significant room for improvement in United's youth system and was underwhelmed by the success of the Under-21 team, who won their league last season.

Van Gaal wants to bring in new coaches and United hope to rediscover their appeal, but without structural change it's going to be tough, especially as the manager has said he's only going to be in charge for three seasons.

Earlier this year Brian McClair, who headed up United's academy system, chose to leave to be in charge of the national system in his native Scotland.

His replacement has not yet been appointed, but insiders say there are so many meetings to attend and so much paperwork to complete to meet the regulations of the elite player performance plan operated at top clubs, that it's a job for two or even three people.

Before he left, McClair said of United: "We're in pretty good shape and are continuing to look all the time. We are always in particular looking and hoping to discover a local lad who will make it all the way to the first team and if not still have a reasonably good career in football. Every year we are still looking for the very best kids within an hour's travelling distance from Manchester. Then at aged 16 we're looking at what we perceive to be the best players in the rest of UK and Europe."

In recent years three United players of past and present chose neighbours City as the club where they felt their children would best develop as players. The sons of Phil Neville, Robin van Persie and Darren Fletcher are all there and their parents have no regrets about the decisions, though Neville's son will soon switch to Valencia's academy.

Traditionally short of United's riches, City once relied on their youth academy. They won Youth Cups and promoted players into the first team, but the club was so unstable that they ended up moving on. Ryan Giggs was at City but left at 14. He went on to have a 23-year career in United's first team, something that would have been inconceivable had he stayed at City

After the club's 2008 takeover, though, City began to get serious about youth development. They invested in infrastructure and talent. They invested in people. Their record of promoting youth players to the first team in recent years is pitiful, but they're determined for that to change.

Their new, no expense spared, training ground is one of the best in the world. It's also in the heart of working class east Manchester, while United are not on a public transport network, tucked away amid the fields and electricity pylons to the west of the city. It was a conscious decision of both clubs to be where they are.

"This is just the start for City," explains a source familiar with both clubs. "There's not a huge difference in the quality of the players at both clubs at present, but that could change. City have two full time coaches for each age group. United's coaches are part-time. Some are good, some less so. The facilities at City's new training ground are superior. Their pitches are fully enclosed and they have floodlights."

At Carrington, where first David Moyes and now Van Gaal insisted that floodlights are installed on first team pitches, the youth players train on open and occasionally windswept fields. Meanwhile, whereas City's youth teams play in a proper 6,000 capacity stadium, United's take place before a temporary stand that seats 120.

It's City who now get most of the best players in Manchester, as was recently the case with an 11-year-old who switched from red to blue. He's already the best player in his age group and was happy at United. However, when his older brother was released by the Old Trafford club, his parents were unhappy and City stepped in to take both boys.

Andrew Cole's son Devante has long been at City and is already a professional. United's former chief executive David Gill used to joke that Devante should join the club. At the time it was light-hearted and said by someone in a position of strength, as United's youth system was one of the best in England. It's no longer a joke.

"United became complacent," explained a source. "They thought that players would come to United because it was United, with the history of the Busby Babes and the Class of '92 -- or even of getting the best Manchester players in recent years like Daniel Welbeck. The truth is that United have stood still while the rest have caught up and, in the case of City, have gone past United."

City can approach young players and offer them a better package. Players under 16-year-old are not allowed agents, but their parents are, which enables them to be given financial inducements way beyond mileage allowances, boots and kit.

City's young players train together and are educated together at a very good private school. By contrast, a select few United players, usually those from outside Manchester, go to a non-fee paying school close to the training ground. United have discussed building a school and having young players live at Carrington, but so far it hasn't happened.

"Imagine you're a single mum in Moss Side (a working class neighbourhood close to City's old Maine Road home)," explains someone familiar with the recruitment process. "Both clubs come in for your son but City offer him a full private education in one of Manchester's best schools, to be continued even if your son is released, as most are. If he stays at United, he stays in the same school he's in. City also offer money, maybe as a one-off payment to a parent. United offer a travel allowance.

"Or, imagine you're a 17-year-old from outside England and both Manchester clubs want you," he continues. "You go to see both clubs and see that United have the history, then you go to City and see that they have better facilities, education and they'll also pay more."

As they get older, money talks. Three of United's best Under-18 players currently have better offers from elsewhere, including Liverpool and it would surprise nobody at the club if they left.

United have an old-fashioned approach in that they want players who want to play for the club but there are grumbles that they focus their resources too much on sports science while rivals are stealing players from under their nose.

Even Everton have a satellite scouting system in Stretford -- right in the shadow of Old Trafford. United have so no such operation in Liverpool. \

"It's getting hard for the United scouts," explains an insider. "United still have a couple of exceptional players in most age groups, but it's getting much harder to sign them in the face of so much competition.

City also have a popular, high-profile figurehead in Patrick Vieira who oversees the youth setup and meet parents personally, just as Sir Alex Ferguson used to do.

Money hasn't always been the issue it has become. Ferguson would tell young players that, if they were patient, then they would get their rewards. He was right about some but, statistically, if a club gets one first team player from their youth ranks every season then they're doing well. Ferguson was happy for reserve players on £1,000 a week to be around, but was that right for the players?

Players often got pay rises by moving, even to third tier clubs, but that was after it became clear they weren't going to make it at United. Many regret staying too long as they held out on to a dream of making it and think that their development stalled through a lack of genuine experience.

United's youth system has become muddled, too. It long irked English players that imports such as Giuseppe Rossi, Gerard Pique and Paul Pogba were on far bigger contracts to them, but even Pogba's wages were a fraction of what he was being offered elsewhere.

Ferguson told Pogba to be patient. He was but still didn't get his chance and has since gone on to become the best young midfielder of his generation and linked with an £80 million transfer this summer.

United got it wrong and it's easy to say that viewed in hindsight, but money played a part in Pogba leaving. There was not enough of it, despite him being offered the most lucrative reserve contract -- worth £20,000 a week -- in club history.

Rossi, Pique and Pogba were all top talents who feel that they weren't given the opportunities they deserved. That can be argued, but a big attraction in them leaving was that they were offered first team football, a chance they all took with Barcelona, Villarreal and Juventus respectively.

Some United fans are obsessed by transfer targets and would wish for their team to be filled with a world XI of stellar franchise players, but ask people inside Old Trafford and they like to see players -- especially local ones -- promoted from the youth ranks.

Will that happen given the lack of current standout emerging talents? Van Gaal used Tyler Blackett, Paddy McNair and James Wilson among the 15 Carrington graduates who played first team football last season -- far more than any Premier League club -- though injuries were the reason for some of those appearances and several were for just a few minutes.

Be it by not spending like other clubs -- Arsenal recently paid Ipswich £100,000 for a 14-year-old -- or by losing out to City, United are not getting the best youth players as they once did. Meanwhile, one City coach who is actually a United fan was interested in a job at Carrington, until he saw the wages on offer.

City are not naïve and know they're not going to produce first team stars, but they currently have three outstanding players in their entire system who they think have a fair chance of making it. The rest will hopefully be sold for a profit -- an area in which United had traditionally excelled -- although City's coaches do worry how departing players will cope with facilities less spectacular than that which they are used to.

United have other problems. Where once they scanned England and Ireland for talents, now football has become globalised. The reserve system in England, with too few games, doesn't help. Players at a similar level in Spain play second or third division football in front of crowds of thousands and against experienced professionals fighting for their win bonus.

Everyone wants to beat the young players of Barcelona or Madrid. They deal with the media, they get abuse off fans. It's real. In England, the infrequent matches are played in front of a few hundred. They feature 20-year-olds who've largely not been good enough to be loaned out elsewhere. Chelsea have more young players out on loan around Europe than they have at Stamford Bridge.

As Tony Park, a seasoned Man United youth watcher and the joint author of "Sons of United", wrote of last season: "At the halfway point, the Under-21s had played 11 competitive games, the Under-18s totalled 13. In that period the Under-21s had used a total of 31 different players while the Under-18s had used 24 different players. How can a player develop if he doesn't play?"

It was baffling that United recently pulled out of the benchmark Milk Cup tournament, where many of their former youth teams had played. Aside from everything else, United have huge support, who love to watch the emerging players, in Northern Ireland. Such was the outcry, United are expected to return.

Van Gaal knows better than anyone how to promote young players and get them winning. There's no greater example than his European Cup winners at Ajax twenty years ago. He can add sorting United's youth system to his long list of jobs as he returns to his desk at Carrington
“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”
User avatar
john@staustell
Roberto Mancini's Scarf
 
Posts: 20256
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:35 am
Location: St Austell
Supporter of: City

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby Bluedj » Thu Jul 09, 2015 1:57 pm

It is an interesting read and most city fans are well aware of the gulf in class the CFA has over the scums set up
Bluedj
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1727
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:38 am
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: vincent kompany

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby Mikhail Chigorin » Thu Jul 09, 2015 2:18 pm

Who's the City coach who is a Scum fan ??.......get him sacked at once.
Mikhail Chigorin
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7933
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:37 pm
Location: Lost in the variations of the King's Gambit
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Bert Trautmann

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby nottsblue » Thu Jul 09, 2015 5:22 pm

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:Who's the City coach who is a Scum fan ??.......get him sacked at once.

Hahaha.

In another decade the rags will be miles behind will little or no hope of catching up. The worm has turned I reckon. This article would never have seen the light of day a year or two ago.

It is imperative that we give players minutes this coming season though. It is no good having all these facilities and the cream of the crop if they don't ever get a chance.
nottsblue
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32448
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: Nottingham
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby JamieMCFC » Thu Jul 09, 2015 7:28 pm

nottsblue wrote:
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:Who's the City coach who is a Scum fan ??.......get him sacked at once.

Hahaha.

In another decade the rags will be miles behind will little or no hope of catching up. The worm has turned I reckon. This article would never have seen the light of day a year or two ago.

It is imperative that we give players minutes this coming season though. It is no good having all these facilities and the cream of the crop if they don't ever get a chance.


I find the one main problem that people have when talking about our academy is they think short term. You hear from the rags who have they brought through or from our own whats the point if no one gets played in the first team. It's not surprising as most people don't do have any experience with long term planning in business. We are still in the early stages of our new youth development policy. We are laying the ground work for 5-10 years down the road.
JamieMCFC
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2034
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:40 pm
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby Ted Hughes » Thu Jul 09, 2015 7:29 pm

Good find, cheers.

Not much mention of their prehistoric football style, as opposed to City's state of the art but i suppose that comes under 'coaching' perhaps. Also, the idea that 'City are not naïve and know they're not going to produce first team stars, but they currently have three outstanding players in their entire system who they think have a fair chance of making it.' Really ?

I wonder which 3 out of about 400, in the whole system, that would be ?

If the coaches can decide that now, even just amongst the 18 to 20 year olds, never mind the rest, then they are even fucking better than we'ive given them credit for being. That is a blatant lie.

Even when these fuckers appear to be criticising the rags, they can't resist a bit of propaganda.

But it's far worse for them than that article suggests.

Also, how is little 12 year old Harvey Neville going to get on in Valencia ? Are his mum & dad moving out there or is the little 12 year old going to live there on his own & start his new education away from City in Spain, perhaps with David Moyes coming over once a week ? Not saying that's also a complete lie, but it sounds rather strange. His mum was proud as fuck twittering about his City team being champions just a few weeks ago. Now he's uprooting his school & football education & moving to Spain ?
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby nottsblue » Thu Jul 09, 2015 7:38 pm

JamieMCFC wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:Who's the City coach who is a Scum fan ??.......get him sacked at once.

Hahaha.

In another decade the rags will be miles behind will little or no hope of catching up. The worm has turned I reckon. This article would never have seen the light of day a year or two ago.

It is imperative that we give players minutes this coming season though. It is no good having all these facilities and the cream of the crop if they don't ever get a chance.


I find the one main problem that people have when talking about our academy is they think short term. You hear from the rags who have they brought through or from our own whats the point if no one gets played in the first team. It's not surprising as most people don't do have any experience with long term planning in business. We are still in the early stages of our new youth development policy. We are laying the ground work for 5-10 years down the road.

I'm not suggesting we have first team regulars promoted from the academy. I'm suggesting it would be very beneficial to all concerned if a few of them were given some minutes this year. That is likely to be in the League and FA cups and the odd substitute appearance. Like i said, a decade down the line and we will likely have a ready made production line, which will generate a bona fide first teamer most years and generate many millions in transfer fees for the rest
nottsblue
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32448
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: Nottingham
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby Ted Hughes » Thu Jul 09, 2015 7:40 pm

nottsblue wrote:
JamieMCFC wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:Who's the City coach who is a Scum fan ??.......get him sacked at once.

Hahaha.

In another decade the rags will be miles behind will little or no hope of catching up. The worm has turned I reckon. This article would never have seen the light of day a year or two ago.

It is imperative that we give players minutes this coming season though. It is no good having all these facilities and the cream of the crop if they don't ever get a chance.


I find the one main problem that people have when talking about our academy is they think short term. You hear from the rags who have they brought through or from our own whats the point if no one gets played in the first team. It's not surprising as most people don't do have any experience with long term planning in business. We are still in the early stages of our new youth development policy. We are laying the ground work for 5-10 years down the road.

I'm not suggesting we have first team regulars promoted from the academy. I'm suggesting it would be very beneficial to all concerned if a few of them were given some minutes this year. That is likely to be in the League and FA cups and the odd substitute appearance. Like i said, a decade down the line and we will likely have a ready made production line, which will generate a bona fide first teamer most years and generate many millions in transfer fees for the rest


From what his agent is saying; if wedon't give Denayer a fair crack, he might be playing against us this time next year.
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby JamieMCFC » Thu Jul 09, 2015 7:42 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:Also, how is little 12 year old Harvey Neville going to get on in Valencia ? Are his mum & dad moving out there or is the little 12 year old going to live there on his own & start his new education away from City in Spain, perhaps with David Moyes coming over once a week ? Not saying that's also a complete lie, but it sounds rather strange. His mum was proud as fuck twittering about his City team being champions just a few weeks ago. Now he's uprooting his school & football education & moving to Spain ?


Maybe he just figured since his dad was the new assistant manager at Valencia he would move with him.
JamieMCFC
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2034
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:40 pm
Supporter of: MCFC

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby nottsblue » Thu Jul 09, 2015 7:44 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
JamieMCFC wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:Who's the City coach who is a Scum fan ??.......get him sacked at once.

Hahaha.

In another decade the rags will be miles behind will little or no hope of catching up. The worm has turned I reckon. This article would never have seen the light of day a year or two ago.

It is imperative that we give players minutes this coming season though. It is no good having all these facilities and the cream of the crop if they don't ever get a chance.


I find the one main problem that people have when talking about our academy is they think short term. You hear from the rags who have they brought through or from our own whats the point if no one gets played in the first team. It's not surprising as most people don't do have any experience with long term planning in business. We are still in the early stages of our new youth development policy. We are laying the ground work for 5-10 years down the road.

I'm not suggesting we have first team regulars promoted from the academy. I'm suggesting it would be very beneficial to all concerned if a few of them were given some minutes this year. That is likely to be in the League and FA cups and the odd substitute appearance. Like i said, a decade down the line and we will likely have a ready made production line, which will generate a bona fide first teamer most years and generate many millions in transfer fees for the rest


From what his agent is saying; if wedon't give Denayer a fair crack, he might be playing against us this time next year.

Denayer is one who we do need to look after. Him going would be a major fuck up on our part and could be as costly as the rags letting Pogba go
nottsblue
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32448
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: Nottingham
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby Blue Since 76 » Thu Jul 09, 2015 8:27 pm

nottsblue wrote:
JamieMCFC wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:Who's the City coach who is a Scum fan ??.......get him sacked at once.

Hahaha.

In another decade the rags will be miles behind will little or no hope of catching up. The worm has turned I reckon. This article would never have seen the light of day a year or two ago.

It is imperative that we give players minutes this coming season though. It is no good having all these facilities and the cream of the crop if they don't ever get a chance.


I find the one main problem that people have when talking about our academy is they think short term. You hear from the rags who have they brought through or from our own whats the point if no one gets played in the first team. It's not surprising as most people don't do have any experience with long term planning in business. We are still in the early stages of our new youth development policy. We are laying the ground work for 5-10 years down the road.

I'm not suggesting we have first team regulars promoted from the academy. I'm suggesting it would be very beneficial to all concerned if a few of them were given some minutes this year. That is likely to be in the League and FA cups and the odd substitute appearance. Like i said, a decade down the line and we will likely have a ready made production line, which will generate a bona fide first teamer most years and generate many millions in transfer fees for the rest


I agree about giving them game time somehow. Maybe none of the current crop of 18-21 year olds will be good enough for us long term (not sure that is the case though) but parents of 11 year olds need to think their kid is going to get a chance. Yes, the money helps, but if the parent thinks long term, the money from a premier league player is more than you'll get at 11. That stat about rags every season is nonsense, as they may have played a kid in one league cup game, but it's still a good selling point. That we went out of the league cup with no kids was poor.

A lot of the best kids were out on loan, which may be better for them long term, but we need to sneak them in the side occasionally. 4-0 at home, us there any point bringing on Navas, Jovetic etc? There's 7 sub's, having a Barker etc on the bench and giving them 10 minutes would give everyone a lift and gives the 16 year olds something to aim for. They might know they're not better than Silva, but if they think they're better than Barker, then you can see where you can get if they put the effort in
Blue Since 76
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5965
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 9:37 pm

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby twosips » Thu Jul 09, 2015 8:35 pm

Ted Hughes wrote:Also, how is little 12 year old Harvey Neville going to get on in Valencia ? Are his mum & dad moving out there or is the little 12 year old going to live there on his own & start his new education away from City in Spain, perhaps with David Moyes coming over once a week ? Not saying that's also a complete lie, but it sounds rather strange. His mum was proud as fuck twittering about his City team being champions just a few weeks ago. Now he's uprooting his school & football education & moving to Spain ?


It's true mate, he's moving there with his dad who's going to be Valencia's new assistant manager.

Straight from the horse's mouth..

http://www.espnfc.co.uk/spanish-primera ... ndy-mitten
twosips
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 9:58 am
Supporter of: mcfc

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby MilnersJaw » Thu Jul 09, 2015 9:23 pm

I find putting the youth kids especially the ones under 16 in private schools abit ridiculous.
Still here.
User avatar
MilnersJaw
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Silver

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby twosips » Thu Jul 09, 2015 9:33 pm

It's only St. Bedes mate. It's not that posh. Pretty normal school really. I went to St. Ambrose in Hale and I could have easily gone to Bedes as I passed the entrance exam for both.
twosips
Kinky's Mazy Dribbles
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 9:58 am
Supporter of: mcfc

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby Scatman » Thu Jul 09, 2015 9:57 pm

MilnersJaw wrote:I find putting the youth kids especially the ones under 16 in private schools abit ridiculous.


Why is that?
Scatman
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4517
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 11:06 am
Location: Manchester

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby bigblue » Fri Jul 10, 2015 1:47 am

MilnersJaw wrote:I find putting the youth kids especially the ones under 16 in private schools abit ridiculous.


Why is it ridiculous to educate kids so they can have a future if/when this whole football thing doesn't work out? Even if they do make it to the professional level, more education will hopefully prevent them from turning into a Joey Barton or Courtney Meppen-Walter.

I think you're just jealous a generation of youth team players are becoming more educated than you.
User avatar
bigblue
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10993
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:11 pm
Supporter of: Manchester's Only
My favourite player is: Yaya

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby Ted Hughes » Fri Jul 10, 2015 5:04 am

twosips wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:Also, how is little 12 year old Harvey Neville going to get on in Valencia ? Are his mum & dad moving out there or is the little 12 year old going to live there on his own & start his new education away from City in Spain, perhaps with David Moyes coming over once a week ? Not saying that's also a complete lie, but it sounds rather strange. His mum was proud as fuck twittering about his City team being champions just a few weeks ago. Now he's uprooting his school & football education & moving to Spain ?


It's true mate, he's moving there with his dad who's going to be Valencia's new assistant manager.

Straight from the horse's mouth..

http://www.espnfc.co.uk/spanish-primera ... ndy-mitten


Fucking hell.

What were Valencia thinking ?
The pissartist formerly known as Ted

VIVA EL CITY !!!

Some take the bible for what it's worth.. when they say that the rags shall inherit the Earth...
Well I heard that the Sheikh... bought Carlos Tevez this week...& you fuckers aint gettin' nothin..
Ted Hughes
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 28488
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:28 pm
Supporter of: Bill Turnbull
My favourite player is: Bill Turnbull

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby Hazy2 » Fri Jul 10, 2015 8:49 am

Ted Hughes wrote:
twosips wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:Also, how is little 12 year old Harvey Neville going to get on in Valencia ? Are his mum & dad moving out there or is the little 12 year old going to live there on his own & start his new education away from City in Spain, perhaps with David Moyes coming over once a week ? Not saying that's also a complete lie, but it sounds rather strange. His mum was proud as fuck twittering about his City team being champions just a few weeks ago. Now he's uprooting his school & football education & moving to Spain ?


It's true mate, he's moving there with his dad who's going to be Valencia's new assistant manager.

Straight from the horse's mouth..

http://www.espnfc.co.uk/spanish-primera ... ndy-mitten


Fucking hell.

What were Valencia thinking ?


Panic over "Giggsy" has assured Phil he will keep an eye on the family !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9688
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby Mikhail Chigorin » Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:21 am

Ted Hughes wrote:
twosips wrote:
Ted Hughes wrote:Also, how is little 12 year old Harvey Neville going to get on in Valencia ? Are his mum & dad moving out there or is the little 12 year old going to live there on his own & start his new education away from City in Spain, perhaps with David Moyes coming over once a week ? Not saying that's also a complete lie, but it sounds rather strange. His mum was proud as fuck twittering about his City team being champions just a few weeks ago. Now he's uprooting his school & football education & moving to Spain ?


It's true mate, he's moving there with his dad who's going to be Valencia's new assistant manager.

Straight from the horse's mouth..

http://www.espnfc.co.uk/spanish-primera ... ndy-mitten


Fucking hell.

What were Valencia thinking ?


They must be on a divine mission to further promote Scum style long-ball football in Spain.

On that basis, both Pulis and Big Fat Sam could have exceptionally bright futures in the Iberian peninsula.
Mikhail Chigorin
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7933
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:37 pm
Location: Lost in the variations of the King's Gambit
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Bert Trautmann

Re: Contrasting youth policies in Manchester

Postby Blue Since 76 » Fri Jul 10, 2015 1:01 pm

twosips wrote:It's only St. Bedes mate. It's not that posh. Pretty normal school really. I went to St. Ambrose in Hale and I could have easily gone to Bedes as I passed the entrance exam for both.


Oi!

Nunquam otio torpebat
Blue Since 76
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5965
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 9:37 pm

Next

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BlueinBosnia, city72, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], zuricity and 111 guests