Football Media

[johnny crossan]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3813970/Marcus-Rashford-Alex-Iwobi-Dele-Alli-nominated-2016-UEFA-Golden-Boy-award.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490

That's it in a nutshell

Rags, Arse and Spuds getting the plaudits while us and Chelsea are stuck at the rear. You'd never guess who had the better stats between Ragford and Nacho but you can guess who gets the most exposure.

Haven't the Rags had every game televised so far this season, and also well into next month?

Pretty sure Donarumma will get it anyway - first team regular keeper at 17 years old, I'd say that's more impressive than Lionel Rashchops and his tap ins.

You're probably right mate, I don't think there has been any outstanding youngsters in the PL, mainly due to game time.

That lad doesn't look 17 though

this is the full list I think - 3 city players on there

http://www.tuttosport.com/sondaggi/calc ... okieAccept

[patrickblue]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3813970/Marcus-Rashford-Alex-Iwobi-Dele-Alli-nominated-2016-UEFA-Golden-Boy-award.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490

That's it in a nutshell

Rags, Arse and Spuds getting the plaudits while us and Chelsea are stuck at the rear. You'd never guess who had the better stats between Ragford and Nacho but you can guess who gets the most exposure.

Haven't the Rags had every game televised so far this season, and also well into next month?

Pretty sure Donarumma will get it anyway - first team regular keeper at 17 years old, I'd say that's more impressive than Lionel Rashchops and his tap ins.

You're probably right mate, I don't think there has been any outstanding youngsters in the PL, mainly due to game time.

That lad doesn't look 17 though

this is the full list I think - 3 city players on there

Why can I only see two, Nacho and Sane?

http://www.tuttosport.com/sondaggi/calc ... okieAccept

[Tokyo Blue]

This is interesting. The BBC have firmly nailed their colours to the mast with this one.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/37499454

[carl_feedthegoat]

This is interesting. The BBC have firmly nailed their colours to the mast with this one.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/37499454

The BBC nailed their colours long ago mate...utter shit heads.

[bigblue]

This is interesting. The BBC have firmly nailed their colours to the mast with this one.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/37499454

Stopped reading here, what a load of horseshit:

Guardiola has already won the Manchester derby at Old Trafford, but he was up against a new manager in Jose Mourinho who did not know his best United XI at the time.

All season will be the "true test of Pep"

[DoomMerchant]

What a fucking senseless op-ed piece void of any actual tactical assessment.

Who the fuck cares what Jermaine Jenas thinks? Some fringe cunt tipping Spurs with a homer attitude qualifies as journalism.

Anyhoo...

Cheers

[Bianchi on Ice]

This is interesting. The BBC have firmly nailed their colours to the mast with this one.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/37499454

Stopped reading here, what a load of horseshit:

Guardiola has already won the Manchester derby at Old Trafford, but he was up against a new manager in Jose Mourinho who did not know his best United XI at the time.

All season will be the "true test of Pep"

When mourinho finally stumbles on his best XI after spending the GDP of a developing country on it (not counting what theyve already spent) will the bbc look at it that way or will they have their tongues out again ready to insert up his arse?

[City64]

Unashamed media rag bias in abundance again this morning . A half empty swamp for there Europa League tie last night and NOT ONE morning paper has PUBLISHED the ATTENDANCE ????

[Wonderwall]

Unashamed media rag bias in abundance again this morning . A half empty swamp for there Europa League tie last night and NOT ONE morning paper has PUBLISHED the ATTENDANCE ????

They cant if Utd don't announce what it was, its not on their official reports either, some creative accounting going on

[johnny crossan]

This is interesting. The BBC have firmly nailed their colours to the mast with this one.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/37499454

The BBC nailed their colours long ago mate...utter shit heads.

and yet there are some on here Carl that think Germ Genius is unbiased.

[Justified logic]

This is interesting. The BBC have firmly nailed their colours to the mast with this one.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/37499454

The BBC nailed their colours long ago mate...utter shit heads.

and yet there are some on here Carl that think Germ Genius is unbiased.

Genius in "Why my ex-club will win" shocker!

[dave watson's perm]

I noticed a headline on Sky saying how City will tower above Tottenham. Hmmmm, I thought, could this be a positive City story for once?? Could it fuck.......

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... s-compares

[Hutch's Shoulder]

I noticed a headline on Sky saying how City will tower above Tottenham. Hmmmm, I thought, could this be a positive City story for once?? Could it fuck.......

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... s-compares

I read that and thought, so what? Pointless article.

[johnny crossan]

This is interesting. The BBC have firmly nailed their colours to the mast with this one.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/37499454

The BBC nailed their colours long ago mate...utter shit heads.

and yet there are some on here Carl that think Germ Genius is unbiased.

Genius in "Why my ex-club will win" shocker!

I think you'll find it's not just his old club (or indeed other old clubs) that the Germ thinks will expose our shortcomings. We've had a quiet interlude from him for a few weeks but he'll be in the vanguard of the revisionist charge when we drop a few points. You can be sure of that.

Incidentally, may I point in out, in a lighthearted lexical way, that you are an oxymoron. The verb to justify refers to an epistemologically normative process whilst formal logic is either valid or invalid. Justified Logic is therefore a juxtaposition of apparently contradictory terms, which maybe is what you intended

[Original Dub]

That sky piece is so cringe worthy. It serves no purpose other than to beat city with the money stick.

This year will be the biggest attack the media will have given us to date. I think that's pretty evident already and we haven't even been beaten yet.

[johnny crossan]

note the headline in this BBC piece reviewing this season's WSL

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37508733

[Hutch's Shoulder]

note the headline in this BBC piece reviewing this season's WSL

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37508733

The article itself isn't too bad, but they couldn't bring themselves to headline the bit where she says City were deserved champions.

[Beefymcfc]

note the headline in this BBC piece reviewing this season's WSL

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37508733

Isnt that her writing for the BBC? If anything it suggests that the Beeb have their set ways and dbhould be using a City player next year.

Yeah, right.

[Dameerto]

note the headline in this BBC piece reviewing this season's WSL

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37508733

Isnt that her writing for the BBC? If anything it suggests that the Beeb have their set ways and dbhould be using a City player next year.

Yeah, right.

It's a kind of diary blog she's been writing for a while now.

[Justified logic]

Incidentally, may I point in out, in a lighthearted lexical way, that you are an oxymoron. The verb to justify refers to an epistemologically normative process whilst formal logic is either valid or invalid. Justified Logic is therefore a juxtaposition of apparently contradictory terms, which maybe is what you intended

Yes, you've got one of the wordplays, both of which are based around the premise that we, all, choose our position and then make our argument to fit our view. Free pig's bladder for whoever can get the other wordplay...