john@staustell wrote:Original Dub wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13364135/The-introduction-salary-cap-stop-Manchester-Citys-accounting-gymnastics-writes-IAN-HERBERT-Premier-League-champions-voted-against-introduction.html
Just left him a comment on that one. Funny how he didn't mention the objection of United
Nice one
I really enjoyed reading this one as well.
''Well done Ian. Any excuse to roll out anti-City nonsense. Your own words state that it is Chelsea who would be guilty, not City, a club that is well run from top to bottom, but constantly accused, not charged, with FFP, PSR and now, because all of that has failed, a wage-cap that they are adhering to anyway!
The word on the street in Manchester is that the 115 allegations actually boil down to just 5 rule breaches. 3 of them are for not assisting the PL with their investigation. But Forest and Everton did, and still got found guilty. There's not a sane person in history who assists their accusers in a trial.
The smart people are saying that the delay is due to agreeing an exit strategy that saves face for the Premier League, because they'll look very silly if they tell the truth, that there is no case to answer. The newspapers will also look silly for continually jumping on the bandwagon with no proof.
It is believed that litigation will follow, from City, against all those who were too quick and eager to damage reputation and integrity.
I'm looking forward to PGMOL like apologies and fines when the truth comes out! Shame, Shame, Shame...''