Chinners wrote:Mase wrote:Justified logic wrote:I think it is admirable the pain some people here subject themselves to for our club.
Isn't that what supporting a team is?
Supporting City can and has been a painful experience at time. City fans generally only ask for and accept fair play as we generally give out. To think that was deliberate thou is well wide of the mark imo ... anyway we won 5-0 .... next
Chinners the only person who knows for sure is Mane himself. Personally I don't think or at least hope it wasn't malicious.
I don't think that's the point though. It was as clear a red card as any given so far this year or last. Moss got it right and there shouldn't even be a debate about it.
The media in general accept that it was red but almost unilaterally are defending Mane and making out it was very harsh on him and Liverpool who most likely would have got something out of that game if the ref had only given him a yellow.
Don't forget. If he got a yellow, we would have played the remainder of the game with Bravo in goal. They'd have fancied that.
We are talking about the media handling of it all not the decision itself, which is irrefutable.
The real debate of how Liverpool capitulated and City totally managed the situation, is largely ignored and we are being given the narrative that you can't draw anything from that result.
I certainly won't get carried away, but the media seem to be doing their job of not deflating the Dippers too much. Making out that 5-0 was unlucky. Making out that they were very unfortunate.
Quite the contrary.
That could have ended up 7-0 and we were in third gear at best.