Wow, talk about being bitter. Isn't that racist? How can they get away with this shit, does racism only apply to black people and all other races it's a free fall assault? Why is it ok for American owners to own, suck the life out of a club, riddle it with debt and no questions are asked? the old cliche they generatd their own money, my arse. A big chunk of premier League funds are generated from middle Eastern TV rights and yet no questions are asked when it fills their own coffers. Are we saying Yanks are morally sound? Really? Do we think Yanks are cut clean, never involved in illegal wars, illegal arm deals? I'm not saying AUDG are cut clean, but this high morale ground bollocks is all about demeaning a certain race because it doesn't fit their narrative.
P.s this is not intended to belittle fellow American blues
This reply sums up everything about this pathetic piece of shite so called journo.
'' Hi Miguel, it's interesting how this issue of "ownership" raises it's ugly head whenever City are in the ascendency - and yet it seemed much more palatable when they were mid-table in November.
Still City's owners are who they are.
So how about - Sultan Muhammad Abuljadayel - who owns 30% of the Independent and the reported "Saudi influence" of the paper.
At what point does ownership become relevant - is all of it relevant - is only some of relevant when it suits.
Are you being "press-washed" Miguel in your reporting?
Are your concerns legitimate regardless of where City are?
Or does City's ownership only really irk you when they sit on top of the table 10 points clear.
Is this honest, highly moralistic reporting, or is it disingenuous "oil-fuelled" writing stinking of hypocracy of the highest order?
I think we all know what's going on here don't we? ''