The mancityfans.net football forum

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:33 am**

Chinners wrote:Cheers for that JC. At the time some of her comments were correct tbf, there were many on here bemused by Pep's treatment & comments about Aguero. I don't think she had an agenda about us at all, just an opinion, her opinion. I would love to see what she thinks about us & Pep now he has the players he wanted, hopefully just as honest. Ashton is the snidey cent in that clip

You're right Chinners, that was a tricky time in March this year when we were out of CL and iffy for a top 4 finish. She's got massive form though - pure dipper envy and hatred dripping from every orifice - which continues unabated I'm afraid.

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:48 am**

Out of curiosity JC, who was the journalist that was talking sense in that vid? Not the bespectacled fellow, the other chap.

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:54 am**

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Out of curiosity JC, who was the journalist that was talking sense in that vid? Not the bespectacled fellow, the other chap.

Charlie Wyett from the Sun

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:56 am**

johnny crossan wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Out of curiosity JC, who was the journalist that was talking sense in that vid? Not the bespectacled fellow, the other chap.

Charlie Wyett from the Sun

Ta.

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 11:01 am**

She was right about Harry Maguire, mind her top 4 predictions were nothing short of risible.

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 11:08 am**

I think all pundits and media hacks should have to also print their predictions from the previous year when doing the next years. That way, everyone can see how incompetent they are. Or clued up in occasional instances. But when they are shown to have continually supported or dissed a club their priority/agenda will be there to see

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 11:16 am**

Chinners wrote:She was right about Harry Maguire, mind her top 4 predictions were nothing short of risible.

She said in a recent episode of The Debate that she isn't too impressed by Guardiola and City because she expected it and she prefers football that susprises her, her preseason prediction above suggests she's talking out of her arse.

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 11:19 am**

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Chinners wrote:She was right about Harry Maguire, mind her top 4 predictions were nothing short of risible.

She said in a recent episode of The Debate that she isn't too impressed by Guardiola and City because she expected it and she prefers football that susprises her, her preseason prediction above suggests she's talking out of her arse.

Yep, if that top 4 comes in then 99.9% of the country will be surprised footballwise as well!

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 2:09 pm**

What does that actually mean,"football that surprises her"?

Would that be a team turning out in fancy dress? Without boots? Without shorts? Wearing skirts? With only 9 players? With quadriplegics on the subs bench? One guy in plaster with a runner?

Genuine question. How did she qualify that preference?

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 2:37 pm**

Justified logic wrote:What does that actually mean,"football that surprises her"?

Would that be a team turning out in fancy dress? Without boots? Without shorts? Wearing skirts? With only 9 players? With quadriplegics on the subs bench? One guy in plaster with a runner?

Genuine question. How did she qualify that preference?

I think she says that City's form is only what she expected after the money we spent and it being Peps second season ..... she's surprised her dippers aren't even close

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 2:45 pm**

Justified logic wrote:What does that actually mean,"football that surprises her"?

Would that be a team turning out in fancy dress? Without boots? Without shorts? Wearing skirts? With only 9 players? With quadriplegics on the subs bench? One guy in plaster with a runner?

Genuine question. How did she qualify that preference?

Can‘t believe Beckenbauer turned up for this lot

https://youtu.be/-2gJamguN04

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 2:50 pm**

zuricity wrote:
Justified logic wrote:What does that actually mean,"football that surprises her"?

Would that be a team turning out in fancy dress? Without boots? Without shorts? Wearing skirts? With only 9 players? With quadriplegics on the subs bench? One guy in plaster with a runner?

Genuine question. How did she qualify that preference?

Can‘t believe Beckenbauer turned up for this lot

https://youtu.be/-2gJamguN04

Excellent, not seen that in a long while.

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 2:53 pm**

Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:
zuricity wrote:
Justified logic wrote:What does that actually mean,"football that surprises her"?

Would that be a team turning out in fancy dress? Without boots? Without shorts? Wearing skirts? With only 9 players? With quadriplegics on the subs bench? One guy in plaster with a runner?

Genuine question. How did she qualify that preference?

Can‘t believe Beckenbauer turned up for this lot

https://youtu.be/-2gJamguN04

Excellent, not seen that in a long while.

Was Kant a cockney ?

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 2:55 pm**

zuricity wrote:
Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:
zuricity wrote:
Justified logic wrote:What does that actually mean,"football that surprises her"?

Would that be a team turning out in fancy dress? Without boots? Without shorts? Wearing skirts? With only 9 players? With quadriplegics on the subs bench? One guy in plaster with a runner?

Genuine question. How did she qualify that preference?

Can‘t believe Beckenbauer turned up for this lot

https://youtu.be/-2gJamguN04

Excellent, not seen that in a long while.

Was Kant a cockney ?

Not sure, mate. But he was only an apostrophe away from can't.

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 3:10 pm**

zuricity wrote:
Justified logic wrote:What does that actually mean,"football that surprises her"?

Would that be a team turning out in fancy dress? Without boots? Without shorts? Wearing skirts? With only 9 players? With quadriplegics on the subs bench? One guy in plaster with a runner?

Genuine question. How did she qualify that preference?

Can‘t believe Beckenbauer turned up for this lot

https://youtu.be/-2gJamguN04

Brilliant! A++

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 4:00 pm**

She looks like she dick dives in a regular basis.

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 4:59 pm**

Mase wrote:She looks like she dick dives in a regular basis.

looks like someone who would enjoy having someone squat over her and shit in her gob

Posted: **Sun Nov 12, 2017 6:27 pm**

As we're on something of a nostalgia trip, I've just had a look at the pre-season predictions in the Independent (11 Aug). All went for City to win the title except this joker.

Jack Austin (Sports Reporter): Manchester City have recruited well, yes, but simple maths will tell you that Jose Mourinho + second season = title. So I’m going for Manchester United. There is an air of confidence and a new swagger around Old Trafford that hasn’t been there for a number of years.

Predictions reduced to simple calculations! Priceless.

Some other good laughs in the predictions and comments but most got KDB right as player of the year (Austin went for Pogba :lol:

).

Posted: **Mon Nov 13, 2017 12:30 am**

johnny crossan wrote:
Justified logic wrote:What does that actually mean,"football that surprises her"?

Would that be a team turning out in fancy dress? Without boots? Without shorts? Wearing skirts? With only 9 players? With quadriplegics on the subs bench? One guy in plaster with a runner?

Genuine question. How did she qualify that preference?

I think she says that City's form is only what she expected after the money we spent and it being Peps second season ..... she's surprised her dippers aren't even close

She's not surprised that we're smashing her prediction, so far?

Posted: **Mon Nov 13, 2017 8:34 am**

Beefymcfc wrote:
johnny crossan wrote:
Justified logic wrote:What does that actually mean,"football that surprises her"?

Would that be a team turning out in fancy dress? Without boots? Without shorts? Wearing skirts? With only 9 players? With quadriplegics on the subs bench? One guy in plaster with a runner?

Genuine question. How did she qualify that preference?

I think she says that City's form is only what she expected after the money we spent and it being Peps second season ..... she's surprised her dippers aren't even close

She's not surprised that we're smashing her prediction, so far?

I like this summary.

The mancityfans.net football forum

Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media

Re: Football Media