The mancityfans.net football forum

Hazy2 wrote:The moral of the story, do not leave Liarpool, the likes of Tony Evans will se to it you are ruined. I would bet he is ghost writing the spitting Scousers piece. Another Scousers who has in 1 drop of the bullshit persona done more than Raheem could ever do, yet he jogs on and will return to Sky like nothing ever happened. Scousers for you!

patrickblue wrote:

Hazy2 wrote:The moral of the story, do not leave Liarpool, the likes of Tony Evans will se to it you are ruined. I would bet he is ghost writing the spitting Scousers piece. Another Scousers who has in 1 drop of the bullshit persona done more than Raheem could ever do, yet he jogs on and will return to Sky like nothing ever happened. Scousers for you!

My view exactly.
Now I'm going to start another row by saying I don't think the abuse is racist, except maybe the occasional cunt with an agenda.
It's bitter scouse, and to a lesser extent rag driven media that have created this situation. It began when Raz left dipperland, and hasn't ever gone away.
And the punters are the same sheep that booed him at every away ground without having any idea why.

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:

patrickblue wrote:

Hazy2 wrote:The moral of the story, do not leave Liarpool, the likes of Tony Evans will se to it you are ruined. I would bet he is ghost writing the spitting Scousers piece. Another Scousers who has in 1 drop of the bullshit persona done more than Raheem could ever do, yet he jogs on and will return to Sky like nothing ever happened. Scousers for you!

My view exactly.
Now I'm going to start another row by saying I don't think the abuse is racist, except maybe the occasional cunt with an agenda.
It's bitter scouse, and to a lesser extent rag driven media that have created this situation. It began when Raz left dipperland, and hasn't ever gone away.
And the punters are the same sheep that booed him at every away ground without having any idea why.

The articles themselves aren't racist in nature however these hacks know that by attacking a successful young black man that the largely racist readership will lap it up. So indirectly racist imo.

patrickblue wrote:That's why I said there are some exceptions. Some people are just racist cunts, and any excuse is enough for them. And I'll also agree with the fact that a lot of the readership of our mainly right wing, and little englander media will take it as some sort of vindication of their views.
But generally, I don't think race has anything to do with the hate campaign. Somehow, the scouse and rag media have got everyone believing Sterling's a money grabbing mercenary, and the poor old hard done by scousers with all their 'istree are the victims (again).

MUS wrote:Is it just me or hasn't Sterling always done alright for England?

He played well in the last game and got blamed for Engs performance. The amount of times they showed the shot he scuffed when the play had already stopped for offside. He even played well in the Euros and got the blame for that. Wasn't he the one that won the bloody penalty vs Iceland?

I've seen him have much worse days for City and pep still backed him and got the rewards for it.

England need to sit the fuck down

Beefymcfc wrote:

MUS wrote:Is it just me or hasn't Sterling always done alright for England?

He played well in the last game and got blamed for Engs performance. The amount of times they showed the shot he scuffed when the play had already stopped for offside. He even played well in the Euros and got the blame for that. Wasn't he the one that won the bloody penalty vs Iceland?

I've seen him have much worse days for City and pep still backed him and got the rewards for it.

England need to sit the fuck down

What it all comes down to is that he had the temerity to leave the Dippers. Since then it wouldn't matter if he'd saved babies from a pride of lions or slayed a murderer who was just about to take his 1000th victim, nothing he does no longer matters.

And yes, he played well in the first half and average, like the rest of the team in the second.

And there we go, the Beeb only pointing out Raheem but no footage of the Lingard misses. What a way to support your nation; it's irrational!

Edit: they now mention the missed chances but he gets an interview, and lauded by the interviewer.

Indeed, very strange.

Dameerto wrote:

Beefymcfc wrote:

MUS wrote:Is it just me or hasn't Sterling always done alright for England?

He played well in the last game and got blamed for Engs performance. The amount of times they showed the shot he scuffed when the play had already stopped for offside. He even played well in the Euros and got the blame for that. Wasn't he the one that won the bloody penalty vs Iceland?

I've seen him have much worse days for City and pep still backed him and got the rewards for it.

England need to sit the fuck down

What it all comes down to is that he had the temerity to leave the Dippers. Since then it wouldn't matter if he'd saved babies from a pride of lions or slayed a murderer who was just about to take his 1000th victim, nothing he does no longer matters.

And yes, he played well in the first half and average, like the rest of the team in the second.

And there we go, the Beeb only pointing out Raheem but no footage of the Lingard misses. What a way to support your nation; it's irrational!

Edit: they now mention the missed chances but he gets an interview, and lauded by the interviewer.

Indeed, very strange.

Most dickheads in the media are goal focused - they don't see the workrate and off the ball stuff that Sterling does (for England and City) so they try and judge him on stats rather than his contribution to the game. They're just showing thier ignorance.

Mase wrote:

patrickblue wrote:That's why I said there are some exceptions. Some people are just racist cunts, and any excuse is enough for them. And I'll also agree with the fact that a lot of the readership of our mainly right wing, and little englander media will take it as some sort of vindication of their views.
But generally, I don't think race has anything to do with the hate campaign. Somehow, the scouse and rag media have got everyone believing Sterling's a money grabbing mercenary, and the poor old hard done by scousers with all their 'istree are the victims (again).

Genuine question mate, if a white player had a gun tattoo (and there's been a few before Sterling) do you think the media would have focused on it like they did with black Sterling?

patrickblue wrote:

Mase wrote:

patrickblue wrote:That's why I said there are some exceptions. Some people are just racist cunts, and any excuse is enough for them. And I'll also agree with the fact that a lot of the readership of our mainly right wing, and little englander media will take it as some sort of vindication of their views.
But generally, I don't think race has anything to do with the hate campaign. Somehow, the scouse and rag media have got everyone believing Sterling's a money grabbing mercenary, and the poor old hard done by scousers with all their 'istree are the victims (again).

Genuine question mate, if a white player had a gun tattoo (and there's been a few before Sterling) do you think the media would have focused on it like they did with black Sterling?

.
Genuine answer Mase. Gun and knife crime in the UK statistically tends to be black on black gangs. That's why the media focused on Sterling. Now if you think that's racist, that's where we disagree.

Beefymcfc wrote:

MUS wrote:Is it just me or hasn't Sterling always done alright for England?

He played well in the last game and got blamed for Engs performance. The amount of times they showed the shot he scuffed when the play had already stopped for offside. He even played well in the Euros and got the blame for that. Wasn't he the one that won the bloody penalty vs Iceland?

I've seen him have much worse days for City and pep still backed him and got the rewards for it.

England need to sit the fuck down

What it all comes down to is that he had the temerity to leave the Dippers.

patrickblue wrote:

Mase wrote:

patrickblue wrote:That's why I said there are some exceptions. Some people are just racist cunts, and any excuse is enough for them. And I'll also agree with the fact that a lot of the readership of our mainly right wing, and little englander media will take it as some sort of vindication of their views.
But generally, I don't think race has anything to do with the hate campaign. Somehow, the scouse and rag media have got everyone believing Sterling's a money grabbing mercenary, and the poor old hard done by scousers with all their 'istree are the victims (again).

Genuine question mate, if a white player had a gun tattoo (and there's been a few before Sterling) do you think the media would have focused on it like they did with black Sterling?

.
Genuine answer Mase. Gun and knife crime in the UK tends to be black on black gangs. That's why the media focused on Sterling. Now if you think that's racist, that's where we disagree.

Mase wrote:

patrickblue wrote:

Mase wrote:

patrickblue wrote:That's why I said there are some exceptions. Some people are just racist cunts, and any excuse is enough for them. And I'll also agree with the fact that a lot of the readership of our mainly right wing, and little englander media will take it as some sort of vindication of their views.
But generally, I don't think race has anything to do with the hate campaign. Somehow, the scouse and rag media have got everyone believing Sterling's a money grabbing mercenary, and the poor old hard done by scousers with all their 'istree are the victims (again).

Genuine question mate, if a white player had a gun tattoo (and there's been a few before Sterling) do you think the media would have focused on it like they did with black Sterling?

.
Genuine answer Mase. Gun and knife crime in the UK tends to be black on black gangs. That's why the media focused on Sterling. Now if you think that's racist, that's where we disagree.

I don't think that's racist mate, but the media focusing on a young black male because he has a gun tattoo, when there's been several before him that are white that have had a gun tattoo on them, that is racist.

Mase wrote:

patrickblue wrote:

Mase wrote:

patrickblue wrote:That's why I said there are some exceptions. Some people are just racist cunts, and any excuse is enough for them. And I'll also agree with the fact that a lot of the readership of our mainly right wing, and little englander media will take it as some sort of vindication of their views.
But generally, I don't think race has anything to do with the hate campaign. Somehow, the scouse and rag media have got everyone believing Sterling's a money grabbing mercenary, and the poor old hard done by scousers with all their 'istree are the victims (again).

Genuine question mate, if a white player had a gun tattoo (and there's been a few before Sterling) do you think the media would have focused on it like they did with black Sterling?

.
Genuine answer Mase. Gun and knife crime in the UK tends to be black on black gangs. That's why the media focused on Sterling. Now if you think that's racist, that's where we disagree.

I don't think that's racist mate, but the media focusing on a young black male because he has a gun tattoo, when there's been several before him that are white that have had a gun tattoo on them, that is racist.

City64 wrote:

Mase wrote:

patrickblue wrote:

Mase wrote:

patrickblue wrote:That's why I said there are some exceptions. Some people are just racist cunts, and any excuse is enough for them. And I'll also agree with the fact that a lot of the readership of our mainly right wing, and little englander media will take it as some sort of vindication of their views.
But generally, I don't think race has anything to do with the hate campaign. Somehow, the scouse and rag media have got everyone believing Sterling's a money grabbing mercenary, and the poor old hard done by scousers with all their 'istree are the victims (again).

Genuine question mate, if a white player had a gun tattoo (and there's been a few before Sterling) do you think the media would have focused on it like they did with black Sterling?

.
Genuine answer Mase. Gun and knife crime in the UK tends to be black on black gangs. That's why the media focused on Sterling. Now if you think that's racist, that's where we disagree.

I don't think that's racist mate, but the media focusing on a young black male because he has a gun tattoo, when there's been several before him that are white that have had a gun tattoo on them, that is racist.

Its all the free Tommy Robinson racist cunts and pro Brexit wankers ................ a pretty toxic mix stirring up so called patriotism fuelled by brain dead morons .

patrickblue wrote:

Mase wrote:

patrickblue wrote:

Mase wrote:

patrickblue wrote:That's why I said there are some exceptions. Some people are just racist cunts, and any excuse is enough for them. And I'll also agree with the fact that a lot of the readership of our mainly right wing, and little englander media will take it as some sort of vindication of their views.
But generally, I don't think race has anything to do with the hate campaign. Somehow, the scouse and rag media have got everyone believing Sterling's a money grabbing mercenary, and the poor old hard done by scousers with all their 'istree are the victims (again).

Genuine question mate, if a white player had a gun tattoo (and there's been a few before Sterling) do you think the media would have focused on it like they did with black Sterling?

.
Genuine answer Mase. Gun and knife crime in the UK tends to be black on black gangs. That's why the media focused on Sterling. Now if you think that's racist, that's where we disagree.

I don't think that's racist mate, but the media focusing on a young black male because he has a gun tattoo, when there's been several before him that are white that have had a gun tattoo on them, that is racist.

But that's my point Mase. They've used the young black male connection, which is somewhat racist as in tarring a whole group of people with the same brush.
But I really don't believe the campaign against Raheem is anything to do with race, but a continuation of the shit he got for having the temerity to leave the Dippers, to quote Beefy.
And not only that, he went to the club who are ruining football, according to the dipper/rag press.
And for more money.

patrickblue wrote:

Beefymcfc wrote:

MUS wrote:Is it just me or hasn't Sterling always done alright for England?

He played well in the last game and got blamed for Engs performance. The amount of times they showed the shot he scuffed when the play had already stopped for offside. He even played well in the Euros and got the blame for that. Wasn't he the one that won the bloody penalty vs Iceland?

I've seen him have much worse days for City and pep still backed him and got the rewards for it.

England need to sit the fuck down

What it all comes down to is that he had the temerity to leave the Dippers.

That to me is all that it comes down to.
Racists will be racists, haters will be haters, but the agenda is from the scouse and rag agenda, not the racist bigots.