The mancityfans.net football forum

Nigels Tackle wrote:

PrezIke wrote:

never been a fan of that cunt

Me neither NT.

He just blows hot and cold.

Paul Pogba, £90M Rag 'footballer' - buy him for £8M in Barclays Fantasy Football - same price as Pedro and Son.

Trying to figure out which is the fantasy - the price the Rags paid or the Barclays game.

Dimples wrote:Paul Pogba, £90M Rag 'footballer' - buy him for £8M in Barclays Fantasy Football - same price as Pedro and Son.

Trying to figure out which is the fantasy - the price the Rags paid or the Barclays game.

Moyes piped up in the Mirror today saying Pogba was good but not a game changer. A few compliments slipped in, but basically didn't seem to rate him as much as Bog Brush, on whom he waxed lyrical in a companion article lol.

Dimples wrote:Paul Pogba, £90M Rag 'footballer' - buy him for £8M in Barclays Fantasy Football - same price as Pedro and Son.

Trying to figure out which is the fantasy - the price the Rags paid or the Barclays game.

Confused me a little as well. It's either because they know he isn't going get many points or due to him being the Rags poster boy they've left it low to get them scrambling to get them into their Dreamteam.

Hutch's Shoulder wrote:

Dimples wrote:Paul Pogba, £90M Rag 'footballer' - buy him for £8M in Barclays Fantasy Football - same price as Pedro and Son.

Trying to figure out which is the fantasy - the price the Rags paid or the Barclays game.

Moyes piped up in the Mirror today saying Pogba was good but not a game changer. A few compliments slipped in, but basically didn't seem to rate him as much as Bog Brush, on whom he waxed lyrical in a companion article lol.

with Matic covering him he will shine this season.

Hazy2 wrote:

Hutch's Shoulder wrote:

Dimples wrote:Paul Pogba, £90M Rag 'footballer' - buy him for £8M in Barclays Fantasy Football - same price as Pedro and Son.

Trying to figure out which is the fantasy - the price the Rags paid or the Barclays game.

Moyes piped up in the Mirror today saying Pogba was good but not a game changer. A few compliments slipped in, but basically didn't seem to rate him as much as Bog Brush, on whom he waxed lyrical in a companion article lol.

with Matic covering him he will shine this season.

Surely their academy lads should be doing that.

Hazy2 wrote:

Hutch's Shoulder wrote:

Dimples wrote:Paul Pogba, £90M Rag 'footballer' - buy him for £8M in Barclays Fantasy Football - same price as Pedro and Son.

Trying to figure out which is the fantasy - the price the Rags paid or the Barclays game.

Moyes piped up in the Mirror today saying Pogba was good but not a game changer. A few compliments slipped in, but basically didn't seem to rate him as much as Bog Brush, on whom he waxed lyrical in a companion article lol.

with Matic covering him he will shine this season.

Matic is an improvement on what the rags had before, but theres a reason chelsea sold him. He's slow and overrated in my opinion. He'll get a bunch of tackles in because mourinho packs the midfield (so Matic has less space to cover), but he's not going to be a huge game changer for them. Just look at the game vs Madrid; the rags were slow and lacking talent going forward. Real barely got out of first gear and breezed by them

bigblue wrote:

Hazy2 wrote:

Hutch's Shoulder wrote:

Dimples wrote:Paul Pogba, £90M Rag 'footballer' - buy him for £8M in Barclays Fantasy Football - same price as Pedro and Son.

Trying to figure out which is the fantasy - the price the Rags paid or the Barclays game.

Moyes piped up in the Mirror today saying Pogba was good but not a game changer. A few compliments slipped in, but basically didn't seem to rate him as much as Bog Brush, on whom he waxed lyrical in a companion article lol.

with Matic covering him he will shine this season.

Matic is an improvement on what the rags had before, but theres a reason chelsea sold him. He's slow and overrated in my opinion. He'll get a bunch of tackles in because mourinho packs the midfield (so Matic has less space to cover), but he's not going to be a huge game changer for them. Just look at the game vs Madrid; the rags were slow and lacking talent going forward. Real barely got out of first gear and breezed by them

Spot on BB.

He's only further reinforcement for their limited, park the bus philosophy.

Taken from RAWK talking about Pep spending money.

the prem isn't a level playing field And it's suger daddy clubs like City and Chelsea that make sure it isn't.

Hypocrite thy name is scouse.

Sadly Slim, because of the media's non reporting of the antics of the G14 and their club's behaviour therein, coupled with the media arse licking of the favoured clubs, whilst at the same time attackingthe likes of City and formerly Chelsea, many, if not the vast majority of dippers and rag's fans have no idea of the embedded corruption working on their clubs' behalf inside the football institutions.

The thick twats actuallybelieve that their riches were accumulated organically and their successes were whooly due to their own efforts.

john68 wrote:Sadly Slim, because of the media's non reporting of the antics of the G14 and their club's behaviour therein, coupled with the media arse licking of the favoured clubs, whilst at the same time attackingthe likes of City and formerly Chelsea, many, if not the vast majority of dippers and rag's fans have no idea of the embedded corruption working on their clubs' behalf inside the football institutions.

The thick twats actuallybelieve that their riches were accumulated organically and their successes were whooly due to their own efforts.

Not just rags and dippers. It's the general population. It's the old adage that if you tell people a lie often enough they accept it as the truth.

The Rags became dominant with the advent of the PL coupled with the Sky deals. Winning approx 50% of PL titles.

Most Rags believe (+many others) that these 'victories' were due to the brillance of Slur Alex :
(Ignoring that they play with 15 men whenever help is required)

This belief is pure funny and plain stupid.

Slim wrote:Taken from RAWK talking about Pep spending money.

the prem isn't a level playing field And it's suger daddy clubs like City and Chelsea that make sure it isn't.

Hypocrite thy name is scouse.

You're absolutely right Slim.

It's as though the Dippers - and the Scum, for that matter - have never been "sugar daddy" clubs.

Dimples wrote:The Rags became dominant with the advent of the PL coupled with the Sky deals. Winning approx 50% of PL titles.

Most Rags believe (+many others) that these 'victories' were due to the brillance of Slur Alex :
(Ignoring that they play with 15 men whenever help is required)

This belief is pure funny and plain stupid.

My problem with them pointing the finger and accusing City of "ruining the game" is that back in the early 80's Liverpool and the Rags bullied the league into removing gate sharing from the rules in order to create a larger disparity in wealth, then in 1990 they waved their dicks around(Along with Arsenal, Spurs and Everton) and bullied the FA into giving them a larger percentage of TV revenue, again with the breakaway league threat and two years later they just did it anyway. Then the G14, the creation of the UEFA Co-efficient and to top it all off, they were too stupid to see a scenario when the CL winners would not qualify. So that happened and they ignored the rules to get Liverpool into next year's competition anyway(I happen to agree the defending champion should automatically qualify, but it was not in the rules at that time...you know what, it's Liverpool...fuck the rules).

If they wanted even, they should not have built this:

and called it organic growth.

Slim wrote:

Dimples wrote:The Rags became dominant with the advent of the PL coupled with the Sky deals. Winning approx 50% of PL titles.

Most Rags believe (+many others) that these 'victories' were due to the brillance of Slur Alex :
(Ignoring that they play with 15 men whenever help is required)

This belief is pure funny and plain stupid.

My problem with them pointing the finger and accusing City of "ruining the game" is that back in the early 80's Liverpool and the Rags bullied the league into removing gate sharing from the rules in order to create a larger disparity in wealth, then in 1990 they waved their dicks around(Along with Arsenal, Spurs and Everton) and bullied the FA into giving them a larger percentage of TV revenue, again with the breakaway league threat and two years later they just did it anyway. Then the G14, the creation of the UEFA Co-efficient and to top it all off, they were too stupid to see a scenario when the CL winners would not qualify. So that happened and they ignored the rules to get Liverpool into next year's competition anyway(I happen to agree the defending champion should automatically qualify, but it was not in the rules at that time...you know what, it's Liverpool...fuck the rules).

If they wanted even, they should not have built this:

and called it organic growth.

Excellent post. The dippers and the rags have their grubby fingerprints all over handle that flushed the possibility of fair competition down the toilet, ably helped by the gonners (with notable contributions from the dippers mark II and chas and dave united).

http://bbc.in/2vUV5pQ

What a dick head

nottsblue wrote:http://bbc.in/2vUV5pQ

What a dick head

Dog!

I've always thought it a bit risky the way everyone jumps on a goal scorer; as a manager I'd be pretty pissed off if my £60m striker was ruled out for a month because the centre half had jumped all over him.

Here's another take on the bog bush, pube heads ball in the face moment.
It's a belter!

Jonty22 wrote:Here's another take on the bog bush, pube heads ball in the face moment.
It's a belter!

that is brilliant.

Nigels Tackle wrote:

Jonty22 wrote:Here's another take on the bog bush, pube heads ball in the face moment.
It's a belter!

that is brilliant.

Certainly is NT. Hats off to whoever knocked it up! Wish I could do this kind of stuff. Ha ha