The mancityfans.net football forum

2 pens against a few cards and disallowed goal?

Walkers soft, rest valid but the big boys wouldn't get those calls at home.

Nick wrote:2 pens against a few cards and disallowed goal?

Walkers soft, rest valid but the big boys wouldn't get those calls at home.

Which was why I thought he had a good game and wasn't swayed, a homer or bias

Chinners wrote:

Nick wrote:2 pens against a few cards and disallowed goal?

Walkers soft, rest valid but the big boys wouldn't get those calls at home.

Which was why I thought he had a good game and wasn't swayed, a homer or bias

We won, so I’m not overly bothered but did find myself swearing at him a lot tonight.
Maybe it was as much frustration at us losing possession so cheaply at times.

He got key decisions right. They were all against us.

Chinners wrote:Thought the ref had a good game, let the game flow, reserved using his cards and got the big decisions correct. Always nice when the ref is not the talking point of the game. B+

very wise. agreed. thought he had a good match. got both Napoli's pens correct. rightly ruled out Jesus' offside goal.

phips wrote:

Chinners wrote:Thought the ref had a good game, let the game flow, reserved using his cards and got the big decisions correct. Always nice when the ref is not the talking point of the game. B+

very wise. agreed. thought he had a good match. got both Napoli's pens correct. rightly ruled out Jesus' offside goal.

... and pissed half the our side off to brain lapse, starting with the lighthouse of our whole game.
result: 2/3 of the City game resembling a Pink Floyd tune.

but yes, he didn't act as a Howie Webb at his sparkling best.

was i supposed to understand any of that?

phips wrote:was i supposed to understand any of that?

am I supposed to care of any let down arising from Your IQ ?

Swales4ever wrote:

phips wrote:was i supposed to understand any of that?

am I supposed to care of any let down arising from Your IQ ?

on second thought, I fear that even that answer may pose difficulties below a certain intectual grade.
hence let me help out with addidional metaphores:

1. I pity You are angry if Your house got burst by California overheating, but it is not my fault if you believe that Climate Change is a Liberals' hoax, and vote accordingly.
despite anything at Your grasp, it will get worse and worser.

2. I pity You are angry if any of Your loved ones had been killed by a sociopath willing to make a statement with a mass shooting at a schoolground, but it is not my fault if you believe that it is "Evil" not sociopaths which pull the trigger on assault weapons freely distributed to any freak under the law that retards like you do contribute to keep in force on Your land.
despite anything at Your grasp, it will get worse and worser.

The world, as always, will keep belonging to smart, advised People and no moronic manners [like that portrayed above] nor moronic political stance can ever affect that very fact.

Wibble

Swales4ever wrote:

That's him.

Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:

Swales4ever wrote:

That's him.

yeah, the cunt bent spaniard I ment.

Swales4ever wrote:

Swales4ever wrote:

phips wrote:was i supposed to understand any of that?

am I supposed to care of any let down arising from Your IQ ?

on second thought, I fear that even that answer may pose difficulties below a certain intectual grade.
hence let me help out with addidional metaphores:

1. I pity You are angry if Your house got burst by California overheating, but it is not my fault if you believe that Climate Change is a Liberals' hoax, and vote accordingly.
despite anything at Your grasp, it will get worse and worser.

2. I pity You are angry if any of Your loved ones had been killed by a sociopath willing to make a statement with a mass shooting at a schoolground, but it is not my fault if you believe that it is "Evil" not sociopaths which pull the trigger on assault weapons freely distributed to any freak under the law that retards like you do contribute to keep in force on Your land.
despite anything at Your grasp, it will get worse and worser.

The world, as always, will keep belonging to smart, advised People and no moronic manners [like that portrayed above] nor moronic political stance can ever affect that very fact.

Jesus. you have the cheek to question someone's intellect and then you respond with that drivel.

I think you should go and find out what a Metaphor actually is before trying to sound really smart and slag someone of with them.

FA cup winners 2006 wrote:

Swales4ever wrote:

Swales4ever wrote:

phips wrote:was i supposed to understand any of that?

am I supposed to care of any let down arising from Your IQ ?

on second thought, I fear that even that answer may pose difficulties below a certain intectual grade.
hence let me help out with addidional metaphores:

1. I pity You are angry if Your house got burst by California overheating, but it is not my fault if you believe that Climate Change is a Liberals' hoax, and vote accordingly.
despite anything at Your grasp, it will get worse and worser.

2. I pity You are angry if any of Your loved ones had been killed by a sociopath willing to make a statement with a mass shooting at a schoolground, but it is not my fault if you believe that it is "Evil" not sociopaths which pull the trigger on assault weapons freely distributed to any freak under the law that retards like you do contribute to keep in force on Your land.
despite anything at Your grasp, it will get worse and worser.

The world, as always, will keep belonging to smart, advised People and no moronic manners [like that portrayed above] nor moronic political stance can ever affect that very fact.

Jesus. you have the cheek to question someone's intellect and then you respond with that drivel.

I think you should go and find out what a Metaphor actually is before trying to sound really smart and slag someone of with them.

Ggggeez!
I promise, I am gonna enroll into Your Accademy at soonest convenience...use to learn something new everyday.

remember, books aside, i come from where figures of speech were invented. well before you had the opportunity to be taught how to take a bath (or shear a fucking sheep, fwm!)

Thanks Your important emotional outing: I always respect a man with some gut.
get no further than last match thread to find sample of a different breed of brave...

I started very few in my life, but I tend to end pretty much all: fucking choose more careful what side of manners you want to be on. fools' 15 minutes won't last forever.

Can you two chaps post pictures of yourselves so I can fully appreciate the delicious content of your disputation?



atm I'm imagining Scarface Al Capone vs Roy Rogers & Trigger

johnny crossan wrote:Can you two chaps post pictures of yourselves so I can fully appreciate the delicious content of your disputation?

guess this would be most popular fascination of my evil self, Bud. [note carefully choosen background colour )

Still I just being true to my "react only" policy:
by eight years and a few sabbatical, every tard is supposed to know where my skin is softer. few can't resist to exploit.
I will abide to the law of the Land as usual and take any sentence deemed just.

Swales4ever wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:Can you two chaps post pictures of yourselves so I can fully appreciate the delicious content of your disputation?

guess this would be most popular fascination of my evil self, Bud. [note carefully choosen background colour )

Still I just being true to my "react only" policy:
by eight years and a few sabbatical, every tard is supposed to know where my skin is softer. few can't resist to exploit.
I will abide to the law of the Land as usual and take any sentence deemed just.

More appealing than I had in mind.

Can you two chaps post pictures of yourselves so I can fully appreciate the delicious content of your disputation?



finding a atm I'm imagining Dante vs Roy Rogers & Trigger

( revised after a pm from this bloke)

Anyone know who this weekend's twat is?

johnny crossan wrote:Can you two chaps post pictures of yourselves so I can fully appreciate the delicious content of your disputation?



finding a atm I'm imagining Dante vs Roy Rogers & Trigger

( revised after a pm from this bloke)

A PM from beyond the grave? Spooky.

Justified logic wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:Can you two chaps post pictures of yourselves so I can fully appreciate the delicious content of your disputation?



atm I'm imagining Dante vs Roy Rogers & Trigger

( revised after a pm from this bloke)

A PM from beyond the grave? Spooky.

Better than a horse head on my pillow though