Page 58 of 88

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:38 pm
by Original Dub
Taylor looking after the rags several times already and we're only 7 minutes in.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:40 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
Original Dub wrote:Taylor looking after the rags several times already and we're only 7 minutes in.


Incredible isnt it....fuckign cunt will get involved in actually playing for them just now...hes dying to kick the ball

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:45 pm
by Original Dub
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
Original Dub wrote:Taylor looking after the rags several times already and we're only 7 minutes in.


Incredible isnt it....fuckign cunt will get involved in actually playing for them just now...hes dying to lick their balls


Fixed for you 8-)

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:06 pm
by Swales4ever
Tokyo Blue wrote:
johnny crossan wrote:
phips wrote:good stuff from Oilver

Nailed Otter with a ban as instructed didn't he? A booking for nothing - pure agenda.

Agreed. Especially considering what he didn't book arsenal players for in the last five minutes. Marty Feldman on Delph; whoever it was on Bernard.

I'm am sorry but have to disagree with the both of Gents. particularly in my capacity of biggest conspiracy theorist of the week.

Overall Oliver's officiating was well consistent and a decent show of his refereeing capabilities. Hat of to him (cunt):
a) perfect officiating performance simply does not exist. too much a complicated job.
b) from immemorable (to me) time, the cards count is fairly reflecting the state of the game: 6 yellows to the negative side, 1 to the positive playing side.
c) aside the fact that only blatant mistake (the lino's) went to City favour, I saw a few episodes that You can file under "respect for the Leaders" (the spotting back to the fault on KdB (?) after the advantange seemingly played on the Sane's offside, to mention the last). nowhere near Slur Alex rulesbook, but still I enjoyed "respect" payed.
d) was taking the missus to airport and didnt see the last minutes involving Otter's card BUT, ruling out the biggest liability of the City defensive dept., against the Foxies: hardly a big blow, isn't it?

Again, fair dos to mr. Oliver glad he proved me - today - a paranoid cunt.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:29 pm
by johnny crossan
Swales4ever wrote:
Tokyo Blue wrote:
johnny crossan wrote:
phips wrote:good stuff from Oilver

Nailed Otter with a ban as instructed didn't he? A booking for nothing - pure agenda.

Agreed. Especially considering what he didn't book arsenal players for in the last five minutes. Marty Feldman on Delph; whoever it was on Bernard.

I'm am sorry but have to disagree with the both of Gents. particularly in my capacity of biggest conspiracy theorist of the week.

Overall Oliver's officiating was well consistent and a decent show of his refereeing capabilities. Hat of to him (cunt):
a) perfect officiating performance simply does not exist. too much a complicated job.
b) from immemorable (to me) time, the cards count is fairly reflecting the state of the game: 6 yellows to the negative side, 1 to the positive playing side.
c) aside the fact that only blatant mistake (the lino's) went to City favour, I saw a few episodes that You can file under "respect for the Leaders" (the spotting back to the fault on KdB (?) after the advantange seemingly played on the Sane's offside, to mention the last). nowhere near Slur Alex rulesbook, but still I enjoyed "respect" payed.
d) was taking the missus to airport and didnt see the last minutes involving Otter's card BUT, ruling out the biggest liability of the City defensive dept., against the Foxies: hardly a big blow, isn't it?

Again, fair dos to mr. Oliver glad he proved me - today - a paranoid cunt.

you're overthinking again S4e - it always ends badly :lol:

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:31 pm
by Swales4ever
johnny crossan wrote:
Swales4ever wrote:
Tokyo Blue wrote:
johnny crossan wrote:
phips wrote:good stuff from Oilver

Nailed Otter with a ban as instructed didn't he? A booking for nothing - pure agenda.

Agreed. Especially considering what he didn't book arsenal players for in the last five minutes. Marty Feldman on Delph; whoever it was on Bernard.

I'm am sorry but have to disagree with the both of Gents. particularly in my capacity of biggest conspiracy theorist of the week.

Overall Oliver's officiating was well consistent and a decent show of his refereeing capabilities. Hat of to him (cunt):
a) perfect officiating performance simply does not exist. too much a complicated job.
b) from immemorable (to me) time, the cards count is fairly reflecting the state of the game: 6 yellows to the negative side, 1 to the positive playing side.
c) aside the fact that only blatant mistake (the lino's) went to City favour, I saw a few episodes that You can file under "respect for the Leaders" (the spotting back to the fault on KdB (?) after the advantange seemingly played on the Sane's offside, to mention the last). nowhere near Slur Alex rulesbook, but still I enjoyed "respect" payed.
d) was taking the missus to airport and didnt see the last minutes involving Otter's card BUT, ruling out the biggest liability of the City defensive dept., against the Foxies: hardly a big blow, isn't it?

Again, fair dos to mr. Oliver glad he proved me - today - a paranoid cunt.

you're overthinking again S4e

in short, Pal, can a gay likes birds?
of course I do: it's my freak nature. ;)

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:14 pm
by Justified logic
What a shit ref we had - again.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:15 pm
by Original Dub
Justified logic wrote:What a shit ref we had - again.


I thought he was pretty good.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:24 pm
by london blue 2
Original Dub wrote:
Justified logic wrote:What a shit ref we had - again.


I thought he was pretty good.

Was decent. Couple of iffy calls on raheem but otherwise sound.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:24 pm
by johnny crossan
Original Dub wrote:
Justified logic wrote:What a shit ref we had - again.


I thought he was pretty good.

he did all he could to damage us with the Otter booking for nothing, strange post - I thought you were joking before OD
but apparently not :?

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:25 pm
by Original Dub
london blue 2 wrote:
Original Dub wrote:
Justified logic wrote:What a shit ref we had - again.


I thought he was pretty good.

Was decent. Couple of iffy calls on raheem but otherwise sound.


Exactly.

What a strange thing to say from the OP.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:27 pm
by johnny crossan
Original Dub wrote:
london blue 2 wrote:
Original Dub wrote:
Justified logic wrote:What a shit ref we had - again.


I thought he was pretty good.

Was decent. Couple of iffy calls on raheem but otherwise sound.

Exactly.
What a strange thing to say from the OP.

not nearly as strange as that

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:28 pm
by Original Dub
johnny crossan wrote:
Original Dub wrote:
london blue 2 wrote:
Original Dub wrote:
Justified logic wrote:What a shit ref we had - again.


I thought he was pretty good.

Was decent. Couple of iffy calls on raheem but otherwise sound.

Exactly.
What a strange thing to say from the OP.

not nearly as strange as that


Or that...

I have a feeling the OP might not mean what you think he means JC

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:30 pm
by Swales4ever
johnny crossan wrote:
Original Dub wrote:
Justified logic wrote:What a shit ref we had - again.


I thought he was pretty good.

he did all he could to damage us with the Otter booking for nothing, strange post - I thought you were joking before OD
but apparently not :?

get your blue tinted spectacles off, my friend. 8-)
Youre sounding like a Blue Martin Tyler, here.

overthing, sure. but spot on. :ugeek:

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:32 pm
by johnny crossan
What's Otter think about being banned for nothing I wonder or Guardiola for that matter?

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:33 pm
by johnny crossan
Original Dub wrote:I have a feeling the OP might not mean what you think he means JC

is he john68 in disguise?

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:35 pm
by Swales4ever
johnny crossan wrote:What's Otter think about being banned for nothing I wonder or Guardiola for that matter?

nothing, nothing?.
Yet to see it, but reading the match thread some said he made an Otter.
how many games we have been badly savaged, ending up with a bigger cards counts?
I see Your point, but still I'd take today's officiating from now to eternity.

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:38 pm
by Justified logic
johnny crossan wrote:
Original Dub wrote:I have a feeling the OP might not mean what you think he means JC

is he john68 in disguise?

Hey! I can whinge with the best of them.

Anyway, with Leicester up next perhaps it's best that The Otter isn't even up for selection. Maybe Vinny?

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 7:41 pm
by johnny crossan
Justified logic wrote:
johnny crossan wrote:
Original Dub wrote:I have a feeling the OP might not mean what you think he means JC

is he john68 in disguise?

Hey! I can whinge with the best of them.

Anyway, with Leicester up next perhaps it's best that The Otter isn't even up for selection. Maybe Vinny?

OK, I give in - he's done us a big favour :roll:

Re: Ref Watch

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 7:53 pm
by Beefymcfc
I had no qualms with the Otter booking. Went in with forearm in the back of Arse players neck. I'd expect a booking for anybody else, just because we don't see it for the Rags (ibracuntabitch) or Dippers (Sliippy G) doesn't mean we should get the same favourable treatment. I'd hate it if them cunts actually started giving us things we didn't deserve.