The mancityfans.net football forum

What a performance that was last night and what a goal , stand tall that team and there supporters , RESPECT !

Yes the class of 92 and all that but anyone who watched Salford v Notts County in the FA Cup can only admire that performance and achievement last night ........... sometimes the blue tinted specs DO HAVE TO come off !

Who cares that they are owned by Uber rags.

That was a class performance an that second goal was amazing.

...they are called city.

lets all have a disco wrote:Who cares that they are owned by Uber rags.

That was a class performance an that second goal was amazing.

My thoughts also pal , absolute vintage FA Cup .

Nigels Tackle wrote:...they are called city.

A couple of ex City academy players aswell , Poole was class second half man of the match !

City64 wrote:

lets all have a disco wrote:Who cares that they are owned by Uber rags.

That was a class performance an that second goal was amazing.

My thoughts also pal , absolute vintage FA Cup .

Snap. Could not give a shit.

However what would be lovely if we got them at home in the later rounds and spanked them 10 - 1 (only went for the away goal due to it being the anniversary of my first ever City game!)

Fuck em. And did I also see Sky have managed to get FC Cunts of Manchester on TV too?

Typical Sky

john@staustell wrote:Fuck em. And did I also see Sky have managed to get FC Cunts of Manchester on TV too?

Typical Sky

Fuck em is right, this will be dressed up as a victory for the rags.

Well done to the dirty Scummy bastards.

I find it hard to get past the rag connection.
So bollocks to 'em.

It's Salford so they're hardly a local team. Fuck um!

I can't stand the media obsession with everything and anything connected with United. That's the only reason they are getting publicity. The Nevilles and Giggs etc just trying to increase their "celebrity" status. I deliberately avoid clicking on any media article connected with the rags.

ruralblue wrote:

City64 wrote:

lets all have a disco wrote:Who cares that they are owned by Uber rags.

That was a class performance an that second goal was amazing.

My thoughts also pal , absolute vintage FA Cup .

Snap. Could not give a shit.

However what would be lovely if we got them at home in the later rounds and spanked them 10 - 1 (only went for the away goal due to it being the anniversary of my first ever City game!)

I'd rather they got the rags, for no other reason than they'd definitely get more shots on target. Or maybe the rags should get FC Scum - imagine them being knocked out by them! There would be suicides in Korea.

But otherwise, some rags buy a team, BBC decide to do a show about it, then show the game, then show the game and the TV show on the 10 o'clock news as if it counts. Meh

john@staustell wrote:Fuck em. And did I also see Sky have managed to get FC Cunts of Manchester on TV too?

Typical Sky

I thought BT and the Beeb had the FA cup not Sky.

Good game. Well done to em I say.

gillie wrote:

john@staustell wrote:Fuck em. And did I also see Sky have managed to get FC Cunts of Manchester on TV too?

Typical Sky

I thought BT and the Beeb had the FA cup not Sky.

My apologies, typical BT.

I want both Salford and FC Filth to get beat. The media obsession with them is a joke and the new fans who are conveniently sick of PL football now the filth are shit could've easily of gone and supported a struggling non league side

What pisses me off about all this is the fact it's part of a wider narrative where the tax payer is funding the glorification of the Rags. The head of the Beeb has been pulled for it and tried to explain himself, saying basically that it's in the public interest.

Well, sunshine, it's not in my interest and I don't want that propaganda shit on my TV, and that's why I wouldn't watch Taggart, Wiggy, the shite of '92, or any other advertisement for the Rags. Because that's what it is, advertising from the Beeb, reaching out to the so called 7 trillion around the globe.

The cunts!

Beefymcfc wrote:What pisses me off about all this is the fact it's part of a wider narrative where the tax payer is funding the glorification of the Rags. The head of the Beeb has been pulled for it and tried to explain himself, saying basically that it's in the public interest.

Well, sunshine, it's not in my interest and I don't want that propaganda shit on my TV, and that's why I wouldn't watch Taggart, Wiggy, the shite of '92, or any other advertisement for the Rags. Because that's what it is, advertising from the Beeb, reaching out to the so called 7 trillion around the globe.

The cunts!

Where's the like button?

I don't pay for Sky/BT/MUTV because the love in makes me sick, but I have no choice but to pay a licence fee. Whilst general football is of interest, why always the same club? What has Arsenal done wrong for them to not have at least one related programme for example? Why not a programme about an amateur club who have been going since the original football league or FA Cup started rather than one that's been bought by rags?

I'm from Salford and didn't give a toss about em pre class of '92 take over. Nothing has changed since.