Page 1 of 1
Greg Dyke - better if liverpool and rags challenge
Posted:
Thu Jan 14, 2016 1:36 pmby Fidel Castro
Does anyone remember Dyke coming out and saying it's in the premier league best interests, if rags and dippers are challenging for titles etc? I am certain this happened, but am struggling to find a link
Re: Greg Dyke - better if liverpool and rags challenge
Posted:
Thu Jan 14, 2016 1:39 pmby Foreverinbluedreams
Think it was Scudamore said that mate.
Re: Greg Dyke - better if liverpool and rags challenge
Posted:
Thu Jan 14, 2016 1:40 pmby Dameerto
I'm not sure it was Dyke - that other guy was being asked about 'the product' of the Premier League when the RAGs and Liverpool were doing shit, and I think he said something about it being in the league's [commercial] interest for those two well supported teams to be doing well.
Re: Greg Dyke - better if liverpool and rags challenge
Posted:
Thu Jan 14, 2016 4:53 pmby Piccsnumberoneblue
Yeo Scudamore.
It's moments like that when I truly believe the game has to be corrupt. Too much money involved for it not to be
Re: Greg Dyke - better if liverpool and rags challenge
Posted:
Thu Jan 14, 2016 5:00 pmby Original Dub
Well this is it in a nutshell.
I don't think the premier league want one team to win it all the time. They want it to be close all the time. And if they see there is a good chance it won't be, early on in the season, they will use their influence later to ensure it is the "most exciting league in the world" each time.
There is nothing more important to them than this, not even in the interest of fair play.
This is so crystal clear, only a fucktard could not see it at this stage.
Re: Greg Dyke - better if liverpool and rags challenge
Posted:
Thu Jan 14, 2016 6:03 pmby Hutch's Shoulder
So he should be happy now they are both challengers for 6th place.
Re: Greg Dyke - better if liverpool and rags challenge
Posted:
Thu Jan 14, 2016 6:13 pmby john@staustell
Pair of cunts
Re: Greg Dyke - better if liverpool and rags challenge
Posted:
Thu Jan 14, 2016 7:15 pmby Im_Spartacus
Original Dub wrote:Well this is it in a nutshell.
I don't think the premier league want one team to win it all the time. They want it to be close all the time. And if they see there is a good chance it won't be, early on in the season, they will use their influence later to ensure it is the "most exciting league in the world" each time.
There is nothing more important to them than this, not even in the interest of fair play.
This is so crystal clear, only a fucktard could not see it at this stage.
They seemed perfectly happy when United were winning it 5 times in 7 years after 2006, and did everything they could to stop us winning Our first title which would have seen them win 6 out of 7 seasons