DoomMerchant wrote:Alioune DVToure wrote:I think they could win it, but I think they won't. I reckon they'll end up finishing behind City, Spurs and Arsenal at the very least. It's just a bridge too far for them considering where they've come from, and one stuffing will knock the life out of them. Let's see if we can't dole it out at the weekend.
The OP's comment about their being provided 'favourable referees' is laughable. What, just to sabotage our title bid?
So you think they'll earn 9 less points than those 3 squads in the next 14 weeks?
I wouldn't wager against them. If they beat us on Saturday then I'd say they're odds on for the title. However they have an injury to Vardy or that other fuck and they'll be 4th.
Tight ass line for them to walk. Surely a lot of fun tho imho.
Sadly tho this is a one trick pony. Their players will leave as will their gaffer and they'll be Leicester again after this season. But to have this one season is brilliant. If we don't win it surely I want them to.
Cheers
Alioune DVToure wrote:DoomMerchant wrote:Alioune DVToure wrote:I think they could win it, but I think they won't. I reckon they'll end up finishing behind City, Spurs and Arsenal at the very least. It's just a bridge too far for them considering where they've come from, and one stuffing will knock the life out of them. Let's see if we can't dole it out at the weekend.
The OP's comment about their being provided 'favourable referees' is laughable. What, just to sabotage our title bid?
So you think they'll earn 9 less points than those 3 squads in the next 14 weeks?
I wouldn't wager against them. If they beat us on Saturday then I'd say they're odds on for the title. However they have an injury to Vardy or that other fuck and they'll be 4th.
Tight ass line for them to walk. Surely a lot of fun tho imho.
Sadly tho this is a one trick pony. Their players will leave as will their gaffer and they'll be Leicester again after this season. But to have this one season is brilliant. If we don't win it surely I want them to.
Cheers
They come to our place next and go to Arsenal after that. If they lose both of those games - and I believe they will - they'll find themselves in third or fourth with 12 games to go.
If they avoid defeat in both games, fair enough, they're the team to beat. Basically, I can only see them winning the league if they cling to the top spot right through to May. A huge task.
Alioune DVToure wrote:nottsblue wrote:Alioune DVToure wrote:I think they could win it, but I think they won't. I reckon they'll end up finishing behind City, Spurs and Arsenal at the very least. It's just a bridge too far for them considering where they've come from, and one stuffing will knock the life out of them. Let's see if we can't dole it out at the weekend.
The OP's comment about their being provided 'favourable referees' is laughable. What, just to sabotage our title bid?
You don't think the FA would want Leicester to win over us? It would do the PL good for an underdog to win. We know how corrupt referees are. Take a look at last night as just one of many examples. They would and will do what they can so we don't win the league. Of that I am certain
Don't talk nonsense. The talk of a league-and-FA-wide conspiracy to prop up the old 'Sky 4' at City's expense is far-fetched enough without throwing minnows Leicester into the mix. If they win the title, they'll have deserved it - even if they do get a few decisions go their way. They've played out of their skins whilst some of the biggest teams in the league (Stretford, Liverpool, Chelsea) have spent big and played like pricks.
nottsblue wrote:Alioune DVToure wrote:nottsblue wrote:Alioune DVToure wrote:I think they could win it, but I think they won't. I reckon they'll end up finishing behind City, Spurs and Arsenal at the very least. It's just a bridge too far for them considering where they've come from, and one stuffing will knock the life out of them. Let's see if we can't dole it out at the weekend.
The OP's comment about their being provided 'favourable referees' is laughable. What, just to sabotage our title bid?
You don't think the FA would want Leicester to win over us? It would do the PL good for an underdog to win. We know how corrupt referees are. Take a look at last night as just one of many examples. They would and will do what they can so we don't win the league. Of that I am certain
Don't talk nonsense. The talk of a league-and-FA-wide conspiracy to prop up the old 'Sky 4' at City's expense is far-fetched enough without throwing minnows Leicester into the mix. If they win the title, they'll have deserved it - even if they do get a few decisions go their way. They've played out of their skins whilst some of the biggest teams in the league (Stretford, Liverpool, Chelsea) have spent big and played like pricks.
Let's not forget the Sky 4 is rags, dippers, chavs and arse. Three of those cannot win the league. That leaves the arse as the only contenders from the powerbrokers. I would imagine Sky will want the arse to win, but if they don't or look like they won't after the usual March meltdown, then Leicester will be the horse they back. It sure as shit won't be us. They know that if Leicester do win it then it will be highly likely to be a one off, whereas if we win with Pep coming then we could dominate for the next few years. Something the money men at the Sky 4 won't be happy about one little bit.
The next PL contract is somewhere north of £5 billion. There is no way with that kind of money floating around the people in power won't try to do what they to get the results they want. It will fail of course but they will still try.
How many times has bogbrush been sent off. Or Shrek. Or Stevie starfish pulled up for diving. Or penalties awarded at Anfield or the swamp or the Emirates for the visiting side. Or added time being far more than should be. Or referees not awarding penalties to us(32 is it OD since last season?). It's these little things that they will try to even things up with.
I would be happy for Leicester to win the PL if we don't. But not at the expense of some refereeing decision either against us or for them. Putting on an impartial hat for a moment I actually think it would benefit English football if a club like Leicester could win it.
Alioune DVToure wrote:nottsblue wrote:Alioune DVToure wrote:nottsblue wrote:Alioune DVToure wrote:I think they could win it, but I think they won't. I reckon they'll end up finishing behind City, Spurs and Arsenal at the very least. It's just a bridge too far for them considering where they've come from, and one stuffing will knock the life out of them. Let's see if we can't dole it out at the weekend.
The OP's comment about their being provided 'favourable referees' is laughable. What, just to sabotage our title bid?
You don't think the FA would want Leicester to win over us? It would do the PL good for an underdog to win. We know how corrupt referees are. Take a look at last night as just one of many examples. They would and will do what they can so we don't win the league. Of that I am certain
Don't talk nonsense. The talk of a league-and-FA-wide conspiracy to prop up the old 'Sky 4' at City's expense is far-fetched enough without throwing minnows Leicester into the mix. If they win the title, they'll have deserved it - even if they do get a few decisions go their way. They've played out of their skins whilst some of the biggest teams in the league (Stretford, Liverpool, Chelsea) have spent big and played like pricks.
Let's not forget the Sky 4 is rags, dippers, chavs and arse. Three of those cannot win the league. That leaves the arse as the only contenders from the powerbrokers. I would imagine Sky will want the arse to win, but if they don't or look like they won't after the usual March meltdown, then Leicester will be the horse they back. It sure as shit won't be us. They know that if Leicester do win it then it will be highly likely to be a one off, whereas if we win with Pep coming then we could dominate for the next few years. Something the money men at the Sky 4 won't be happy about one little bit.
The next PL contract is somewhere north of £5 billion. There is no way with that kind of money floating around the people in power won't try to do what they to get the results they want. It will fail of course but they will still try.
How many times has bogbrush been sent off. Or Shrek. Or Stevie starfish pulled up for diving. Or penalties awarded at Anfield or the swamp or the Emirates for the visiting side. Or added time being far more than should be. Or referees not awarding penalties to us(32 is it OD since last season?). It's these little things that they will try to even things up with.
I would be happy for Leicester to win the PL if we don't. But not at the expense of some refereeing decision either against us or for them. Putting on an impartial hat for a moment I actually think it would benefit English football if a club like Leicester could win it.
Is your 'impartial hat' wrapped in tinfoil?
I don't mean to be overly rude here, but that first paragraph is sheer drivel. If you choose to buy into the fantastical conspiracy theory that the PL/FA & match officials at all level are colluding to make sure the 'Sky 4' (not an official group, by the way) are looked after, then fine. To me, that is batshit enough, but throwing Leicester into the mix in order to conceive of a top-down 'anyone but City' fix-up is beyond ludicrous.
Look, we will win the league if we deserve to win the league. Who were the last champions who didn't deserve to win the Premier League? Answer me that.
A bad decision which favours Leicester to our detriment on Saturday does not give weight to your bonkers theory. Shit happens.
nottsblue wrote:We have differing opinions. Fair enough. I never have a problem with that. But I will just say, are you happy with the standard of referees we have had this season? If you are then fair enough. If you are not then a little bit of what I am suggesting may be close to the truth
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:"Who were the last champions who didn't deserve to win the Premier League? Answer me that. "
Us in 2012 and 2014. We didn't deserve them titles we only won them because others who deserved them threw them away.
nottsblue wrote:Let's not forget the Sky 4 is rags, dippers, chavs and arse. Three of those cannot win the league. That leaves the arse as the only contenders from the powerbrokers. I would imagine Sky will want the arse to win, but if they don't or look like they won't after the usual March meltdown, then Leicester will be the horse they back. It sure as shit won't be us. They know that if Leicester do win it then it will be highly likely to be a one off, whereas if we win with Pep coming then we could dominate for the next few years. Something the money men at the Sky 4 won't be happy about one little bit.
The next PL contract is somewhere north of £5 billion. There is no way with that kind of money floating around the people in power won't try to do what they to get the results they want. It will fail of course but they will still try.
BlueinBosnia wrote:nottsblue wrote:Let's not forget the Sky 4 is rags, dippers, chavs and arse. Three of those cannot win the league. That leaves the arse as the only contenders from the powerbrokers. I would imagine Sky will want the arse to win, but if they don't or look like they won't after the usual March meltdown, then Leicester will be the horse they back. It sure as shit won't be us. They know that if Leicester do win it then it will be highly likely to be a one off, whereas if we win with Pep coming then we could dominate for the next few years. Something the money men at the Sky 4 won't be happy about one little bit.
The next PL contract is somewhere north of £5 billion. There is no way with that kind of money floating around the people in power won't try to do what they to get the results they want. It will fail of course but they will still try.
The notion of a 'Sky 4' is coming up to being a decade out of date. Kids who were 4 years old when we were taken over will be 12 at the start of our next campaign. In their football-aware lifetimes (taken here as being from the age of 7), trophies will have been won by:
Birmingham LC
Us FAC, PLx2, LC
Rags PLx2
Liverpool LC
Chelsea FAC, PL, LC, CL
Wigan FAC
Swansea LC
Arsenal FACx2
Plus whoever wins trophies this season.
That's eight teams winning domestic trophies, with us being the most successful domestically, behind only Chelsea (who are equal in number of trophies won, but ahead on merit due to one of those being the Champions League), in a far more diverse field than ever over the past two decades. Over the past five seasons, we have only won one trophy less than the Rags, Arsenal and Liverpool combined. Add to that the fact that Swansea and Bournemouth (two teams from areas with traditionally high Rag/Liverpool support) have joined the Premiership, drawing tens of thousands of kids (and their accompanying money) away from the big clubs.
Do you really think 'the people in power' would have let this pattern go on for so long, were there some kind of conspiracy? Probably 2 million or so fewer people support the 'Sky 4' now than would have been the case had 'the people in power' stuck to any gameplan they had. The idea that there could be some conspiracy to get Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool and the Rags back to the head of the table is well and truly dead in the water.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: AFKAE, belleebee, Bluemoon4610, carl_feedthegoat, city72, Harry Dowd scored, Indianablue, john@staustell, PeterParker, rosbif cuisson 'bleu', stupot and 509 guests