Saul Goodman wrote:zuricity wrote:Saul Goodman wrote:Mase wrote:Weird why he's got an extension when he's only been here a year
I'll never understand why clubs do this.
Perhaps if you look at the Times report on him you might understand why .
Just read it and I still dont understand why.
I understand how good he is...but that's even more incentive for the club not to extend his contract (yet). You milk a few more years of a top-class CB on lower wages that he deserves; thats a good thing for the club. then you extend when he's got 1.5 yrs left on his deal. plus, you never know, maybe he gets a horrific injury and never recovers his form.
I asked the same thing, but what when I read this:
Laporte has every reason to be self-assured. Save for Virgil van Dijk, he has been the best centre half in the Premier League this season.
For that reason City have opened negotiations with Laporte over a new contract — one he is expected to sign — even though his present deal has four and a half years left to run. Even though Brahim Díaz, his best friend, left City for Real Madrid last month, he is happy where he is.
it would seem to mean one of two scenarios, or some combination of the two:
1) He, and/or his agent "kindly" hinted to the club that he is performing above expectations for the wages they initially signed him to, particularly compared to similar level players of his level in the PL at his position (probably compared to VVD's wages). He's clearly more of a proven player in the PL, outside of Spain, and in big games so those question marks were still there when we signed him despite all of the talent.
2) City wanting to ensure he is as happy as possible and to ensure lowering interest from other clubs as he is growing in stature as a player, knowing how reliant we are going to be on him in the coming seasons, and how hard it would to be to replace him want to keep him signed for as long as possible to wages he and his agent will be satisfied with.