The BEST FORUM in all the land and all the world
http://www.mancityfans.net/mcfnet/
http://www.mancityfans.net/mcfnet/viewtopic.php?f=119&t=51785
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:18 pmPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:25 pmHutch's Shoulder wrote:The bloody title says 'outshined' instead of of 'outshone' so it's no wonder there's no sense in the tweets.
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:47 pmSlim wrote:Hutch's Shoulder wrote:The bloody title says 'outshined' instead of of 'outshone' so it's no wonder there's no sense in the tweets.
The Germany international was outshined by City's loanee Patrick Roberts, who opened the scoring for Celtic after four minutes.
Did you spot the other mistake?
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:17 pmMikhail Chigorin wrote:Original Dub wrote:Any of you lot on twitter?
You might want to remind these football experts who they're talking about.
https://www.google.ie/amp/www.goal.com/ ... stroyed-on
Gosh, there are some really knowledgeable and erudite footballing outpourings from that gaggle of 'cognoscenti' on there OD.
Big helpings of the humblest of humble pies are required there, in the hope that they might all choke as their gullets get overwhelmed.
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 6:02 pmPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 6:05 pmsheblue wrote:That shit head on sky just reminded he cost 40 million..
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 6:47 pmnottsblue wrote:sheblue wrote:That shit head on sky just reminded he cost 40 million..
When it was £37m.
However, why let something silly like the actual amounts get in the way
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 6:53 pmSlim wrote:nottsblue wrote:sheblue wrote:That shit head on sky just reminded he cost 40 million..
When it was £37m.
However, why let something silly like the actual amounts get in the way
And Pogba actually cost the filth £121M, but they removed the agent's fees(which the filth paid), got it down to £93M and then for some reason now report it as £89M.
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 7:01 pmSlim wrote:nottsblue wrote:sheblue wrote:That shit head on sky just reminded he cost 40 million..
When it was £37m.
However, why let something silly like the actual amounts get in the way
And Pogba actually cost the filth £121M, but they removed the agent's fees(which the filth paid), got it down to £93M and then for some reason now report it as £89M.
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 7:03 pmPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 7:13 pmPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:01 pmPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:22 pmPosted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:30 pmPeter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Pogba will have cost the rags north of £200 million if he sees out his contract. Quite a price to pay for the embodiment of mediocrity.
As for Sané, an absolute snip at £37 million. The lad is going to be sensational.
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:31 pmPeter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Pogba will have cost the rags north of £200 million if he sees out his contract. Quite a price to pay for the embodiment of mediocrity.
As for Sané, an absolute snip at £37 million. The lad is going to be sensational.
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:31 pmphips wrote:if he can better learn when to take on defenders and when not to and rein in some of his dribbling he will be so much more lethal. getting there.
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:40 pmScatman wrote:Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Pogba will have cost the rags north of £200 million if he sees out his contract. Quite a price to pay for the embodiment of mediocrity.
As for Sané, an absolute snip at £37 million. The lad is going to be sensational.
Where does 200m come from?
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:22 pmPeter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Pogba will have cost the rags north of £200 million if he sees out his contract. Quite a price to pay for the embodiment of mediocrity.
As for Sané, an absolute snip at £37 million. The lad is going to be sensational.
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:39 pmMikhail Chigorin wrote:Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Pogba will have cost the rags north of £200 million if he sees out his contract. Quite a price to pay for the embodiment of mediocrity.
As for Sané, an absolute snip at £37 million. The lad is going to be sensational.
Perhaps he'll sell (well, not him personally) a load of shirts to completely cover such a heavy outlay, albeit for nothing more than an abject plodder.
Very popular is U****d (or so they would have us believe)
Watch on