Page 18 of 35

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 5:30 pm
by nottsblue
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
john@staustell wrote:I sense a last minute very cut price deal. We aren't in a very good position to demand fees on Hart as everybody and his dog knows he has to leave.

Looks like we won't need a shitty stick to fend off would be suitors. Considering he is currently a number one International goalie with lots of experience I am a tad surprised. Just hope we don't panic sell and get dry bummed. He is worth at least £25m so if those cheapskates at Everton come knocking they should be told to pay up. It's not as if they have no money now is it!


It's not really that surprising when you consider what he would cost in terms of transfer fee and wages, that restricts the number of clubs that could afford him and those that can are set in terms of goalkeepers.

But surely someone like a Bournemouth or Middlesbrough or Sunderland or Newcastle would spend that kind of money as it would give them a better shot at staying in the PL, or getting promoted in the case of Newcastle. In fact most of the PL from seven or eight down's prime objective is to stay in the PL and a decent goalie goes a long way to achieving this. The riches on offer in the PL now mean paying £20/25m for one player isn't as outlandish as in previous seasons. Joe must realise he is going to have to step down a level and he has earned plenty from the game so accepting a lower wage ( will still be more per week than most earn in a year or even two) will be something he should suck up and do.

Let's see how important playing really is to him

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 5:56 pm
by johnny crossan
zuricity wrote:Isn't he training with Schweini ?

OS training pics gonna be thin on the ground this week?

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 7:28 am
by Hazy2
Everton want Hart on the never never ! Typical Scousers.

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 8:17 am
by gillie
Whilst Joe has been a central part of our success and I for one think he is a great shot stopper he lacks a lot of fundamental GK traits imo ie slow off his line,not catching preferring to punch instead and his distribution has always been poor. The only constant we have as fans is the club players and managers will always come and go but the club will hopefully always remain and as such it has to do what the present manager thinks is in the best interest of the club during his tenure. So if it's without Joe so be it let's thank him and move on hopefully to greater things.

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 10:44 am
by johnny crossan
Happy to be
Just number 3

Sad it should come to this- his wages demands seem to vary between £100k and £150k a week depending which rag you read - big money for a keeper whichever it is

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 11:20 am
by blues2win
The body language in this photo is not good. Unsurprising. The sooner Hart finds a new home the better. The whole saga is a distraction. Apparently the Cillessen deal ( Bravo's Barca replacement) is on hold until after the Dutch league match tomorrow which means it'll be Thursday at the earliest before Bravo arrives in Manchester. We need him registered for the Sunday match.

https://twitter.com/city_watch/status/7 ... 7343891456

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 11:23 am
by blues2win
At last. CityWatch says Bravo spotted at Barcelona airport but flight delayed. Should arrive this pm. Excellent. Hopefully signs tomorrow.

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 11:39 am
by Wonderwall
When it comes down to it, I really like Joe hart and think he has represented our club in an exemplary manner both on and off the pitch. Some people don't like his mannerisms and the way he smiles at situations, however, that's his personality. You can bet he is hurt just as much as we are when we lose, just because he has a life off the pitch and knows the opposition on a personal level has no impact on his performances. I don't care if he goes and hugs the opposition after the final whistle.

However, I am a Manchester City fan and not a Joe Hart fan. I support my club and want it to be the best it can be. If that means that Joe leaves, then that is the way it is. We all know that Joes weakness is his ground play, we have moaned about it for a long time on here. It is something we knew about, but we accepted it because he is also a top keeper who has saved us on many occasions, too many to list. It was also acceptable for him to play his own game by Hughes, Mancini and Pellegrini. Safety first into Row Z was acceptable under those managers. It isn't under Pep, he is redefining the way we play football and control under pressure and a calm presence on the ball are the number one attributes Pep wants in a keeper. Joe Hart is not that keeper, I wish he was, but he isnt, so we move on and get a keeper that can play in that way. Bravo can do it and has done it as we have all seen, so it will be an upgrade for the team and will help us control the play.

I know Bravo is 33 but as Doug has said our reserve keepers have been playing this way for some time. Gunn is good on the ball, I would say he is ready personally as I have been very impressed with him every time I have seen him. Which includes making a horrible mistake or two. How else will he grow and learn. Our U18 keeper is probably the best distributor of a ball I have seen, he has a great touch, as good as any outfield player. He needs to continue to learn and hopefully grow a bit as he isn't the tallest and he could well be one we produce, local lad and a massive City fan to boot!

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 11:44 am
by Foreverinbluedreams
Wonderwall wrote:When it comes down to it, I really like Joe hart and think he has represented our club in an exemplary manner both on and off the pitch. Some people don't like his mannerisms and the way he smiles at situations, however, that's his personality. You can bet he is hurt just as much as we are when we lose, just because he has a life off the pitch and knows the opposition on a personal level has no impact on his performances. I don't care if he goes and hugs the opposition after the final whistle.

However, I am a Manchester City fan and not a Joe Hart fan. I support my club and want it to be the best it can be. If that means that Joe leaves, then that is the way it is. We all know that Joes weakness is his ground play, we have moaned about it for a long time on here. It is something we knew about, but we accepted it because he is also a top keeper who has saved us on many occasions, too many to list. It was also acceptable for him to play his own game by Hughes, Mancini and Pellegrini. Safety first into Row Z was acceptable under those managers. It isn't under Pep, he is redefining the way we play football and control under pressure and a calm presence on the ball are the number one attributes Pep wants in a keeper. Joe Hart is not that keeper, I wish he was, but he isnt, so we move on and get a keeper that can play in that way. Bravo can do it and has done it as we have all seen, so it will be an upgrade for the team and will help us control the play.

I know Bravo is 33 but as Doug has said our reserve keepers have been playing this way for some time. Gunn is good on the ball, I would say he is ready personally as I have been very impressed with him every time I have seen him. Which includes making a horrible mistake or two. How else will he grow and learn. Our U18 keeper is probably the best distributor of a ball I have seen, he has a great touch, as good as any outfield player. He needs to continue to learn and hopefully grow a bit as he isn't the tallest and he could well be one we produce, local lad and a massive City fan to boot!


Grimshaw?

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 11:46 am
by Spurge
nottsblue wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
john@staustell wrote:I sense a last minute very cut price deal. We aren't in a very good position to demand fees on Hart as everybody and his dog knows he has to leave.

Looks like we won't need a shitty stick to fend off would be suitors. Considering he is currently a number one International goalie with lots of experience I am a tad surprised. Just hope we don't panic sell and get dry bummed. He is worth at least £25m so if those cheapskates at Everton come knocking they should be told to pay up. It's not as if they have no money now is it!


It's not really that surprising when you consider what he would cost in terms of transfer fee and wages, that restricts the number of clubs that could afford him and those that can are set in terms of goalkeepers.

But surely someone like a Bournemouth or Middlesbrough or Sunderland or Newcastle would spend that kind of money as it would give them a better shot at staying in the PL, or getting promoted in the case of Newcastle. In fact most of the PL from seven or eight down's prime objective is to stay in the PL and a decent goalie goes a long way to achieving this. The riches on offer in the PL now mean paying £20/25m for one player isn't as outlandish as in previous seasons. Joe must realise he is going to have to step down a level and he has earned plenty from the game so accepting a lower wage ( will still be more per week than most earn in a year or even two) will be something he should suck up and do.

Let's see how important playing really is to him


I think the Bournemouth, boro's etc could take a punt but the issue is not so much about being able to secure the player, but more of an issue around wages. They are likely to have a wages structure in place including a ceiling on what players are paid a week - if they break that it sets a difficult precedent and could cause unrest amongst players effecting morale etc, this would certainly be a key issue for a club like Bournemouth where team morale and a strong work ethic has been key to their relative success last season as well as this season.

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 11:49 am
by Wonderwall
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:When it comes down to it, I really like Joe hart and think he has represented our club in an exemplary manner both on and off the pitch. Some people don't like his mannerisms and the way he smiles at situations, however, that's his personality. You can bet he is hurt just as much as we are when we lose, just because he has a life off the pitch and knows the opposition on a personal level has no impact on his performances. I don't care if he goes and hugs the opposition after the final whistle.

However, I am a Manchester City fan and not a Joe Hart fan. I support my club and want it to be the best it can be. If that means that Joe leaves, then that is the way it is. We all know that Joes weakness is his ground play, we have moaned about it for a long time on here. It is something we knew about, but we accepted it because he is also a top keeper who has saved us on many occasions, too many to list. It was also acceptable for him to play his own game by Hughes, Mancini and Pellegrini. Safety first into Row Z was acceptable under those managers. It isn't under Pep, he is redefining the way we play football and control under pressure and a calm presence on the ball are the number one attributes Pep wants in a keeper. Joe Hart is not that keeper, I wish he was, but he isnt, so we move on and get a keeper that can play in that way. Bravo can do it and has done it as we have all seen, so it will be an upgrade for the team and will help us control the play.

I know Bravo is 33 but as Doug has said our reserve keepers have been playing this way for some time. Gunn is good on the ball, I would say he is ready personally as I have been very impressed with him every time I have seen him. Which includes making a horrible mistake or two. How else will he grow and learn. Our U18 keeper is probably the best distributor of a ball I have seen, he has a great touch, as good as any outfield player. He needs to continue to learn and hopefully grow a bit as he isn't the tallest and he could well be one we produce, local lad and a massive City fan to boot!


Grimshaw?


Yes, thats the lad.

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 11:51 am
by Foreverinbluedreams
Wonderwall wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
Wonderwall wrote:When it comes down to it, I really like Joe hart and think he has represented our club in an exemplary manner both on and off the pitch. Some people don't like his mannerisms and the way he smiles at situations, however, that's his personality. You can bet he is hurt just as much as we are when we lose, just because he has a life off the pitch and knows the opposition on a personal level has no impact on his performances. I don't care if he goes and hugs the opposition after the final whistle.

However, I am a Manchester City fan and not a Joe Hart fan. I support my club and want it to be the best it can be. If that means that Joe leaves, then that is the way it is. We all know that Joes weakness is his ground play, we have moaned about it for a long time on here. It is something we knew about, but we accepted it because he is also a top keeper who has saved us on many occasions, too many to list. It was also acceptable for him to play his own game by Hughes, Mancini and Pellegrini. Safety first into Row Z was acceptable under those managers. It isn't under Pep, he is redefining the way we play football and control under pressure and a calm presence on the ball are the number one attributes Pep wants in a keeper. Joe Hart is not that keeper, I wish he was, but he isnt, so we move on and get a keeper that can play in that way. Bravo can do it and has done it as we have all seen, so it will be an upgrade for the team and will help us control the play.

I know Bravo is 33 but as Doug has said our reserve keepers have been playing this way for some time. Gunn is good on the ball, I would say he is ready personally as I have been very impressed with him every time I have seen him. Which includes making a horrible mistake or two. How else will he grow and learn. Our U18 keeper is probably the best distributor of a ball I have seen, he has a great touch, as good as any outfield player. He needs to continue to learn and hopefully grow a bit as he isn't the tallest and he could well be one we produce, local lad and a massive City fan to boot!


Grimshaw?


Yes, thats the lad.


Cheers, hard to keep up, we seem to have an abundance of keepers at youth level.

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 11:53 am
by nottsblue
Spurge wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
john@staustell wrote:I sense a last minute very cut price deal. We aren't in a very good position to demand fees on Hart as everybody and his dog knows he has to leave.

Looks like we won't need a shitty stick to fend off would be suitors. Considering he is currently a number one International goalie with lots of experience I am a tad surprised. Just hope we don't panic sell and get dry bummed. He is worth at least £25m so if those cheapskates at Everton come knocking they should be told to pay up. It's not as if they have no money now is it!


It's not really that surprising when you consider what he would cost in terms of transfer fee and wages, that restricts the number of clubs that could afford him and those that can are set in terms of goalkeepers.

But surely someone like a Bournemouth or Middlesbrough or Sunderland or Newcastle would spend that kind of money as it would give them a better shot at staying in the PL, or getting promoted in the case of Newcastle. In fact most of the PL from seven or eight down's prime objective is to stay in the PL and a decent goalie goes a long way to achieving this. The riches on offer in the PL now mean paying £20/25m for one player isn't as outlandish as in previous seasons. Joe must realise he is going to have to step down a level and he has earned plenty from the game so accepting a lower wage ( will still be more per week than most earn in a year or even two) will be something he should suck up and do.

Let's see how important playing really is to him


I think the Bournemouth, boro's etc could take a punt but the issue is not so much about being able to secure the player, but more of an issue around wages. They are likely to have a wages structure in place including a ceiling on what players are paid a week - if they break that it sets a difficult precedent and could cause unrest amongst players effecting morale etc, this would certainly be a key issue for a club like Bournemouth where team morale and a strong work ethic has been key to their relative success last season as well as this season.

Thats why i suggested Joe will have to take a pay cut. And still earn a lot of money. It will boil down to how much he wants to play

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 12:11 pm
by Nigels Tackle
if he leaves on a perm deal, we'll pay him out (a big chunk anyway) on the contract he signed to the end of the 2019 season so he can afford to take a pay cut if he's desperate to play

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 12:26 pm
by john@staustell
Nigels Tackle wrote:if he leaves on a perm deal, we'll pay him out (a big chunk anyway) on the contract he signed to the end of the 2019 season so he can afford to take a pay cut if he's desperate to play


Be interesting to see.

It's all a big blow to the old boy's ego, but I don't sympathise too greatly with multi-millionaires with bruised egos.

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 4:52 pm
by johnny crossan
Will he be like Cardinal Wolsey?

'So farewell—to the little good you bear me.
Farewell? a long farewell to all my greatness! '

spread over the rest of the season

or a quick adios amigos tomorrow night

hope it's the latter

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:27 pm
by nottsblue
Looks like he's gonna play tomorrow.

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 6:06 pm
by sheblue
An opportunity to say goodbye to all his loyal supporters.

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 6:44 pm
by Hazy2
nottsblue wrote:Looks like he's gonna play tomorrow.



With Bravo waving to the fans !!!!!!! Ouch !!!!!!!

Re: Joe Hart

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2016 7:31 pm
by Nigels Tackle
nottsblue wrote:Looks like he's gonna play tomorrow.


6 og's?