Page 1 of 2
MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Sun Oct 02, 2016 3:05 pm
by Beefymcfc
Not sure.
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Sun Oct 02, 2016 3:10 pm
by Tokyo Blue
Can't really see much beyond Fernandinho or Stones.
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Sun Oct 02, 2016 3:11 pm
by sheblue
Stones was good 2nd half.
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Sun Oct 02, 2016 3:14 pm
by s1ty m
Stones for me. Easily. There was some shite out there today. The Kolarov mistake goes on...
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Sun Oct 02, 2016 3:16 pm
by london blue 2
Stones was our best defender, midfielder and attacker.
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Sun Oct 02, 2016 3:30 pm
by dazby
Stones is absolutely world class. What a player.
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Sun Oct 02, 2016 3:31 pm
by iwasthere2012
Stones...... for pure effort and desire, if nothing else.
When there was no team performance in front of him, he tried to take things forward for us.
Not a lot to choose from today.
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Sun Oct 02, 2016 3:34 pm
by mr_nool
Stones in lack of better options.
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Sun Oct 02, 2016 5:34 pm
by patrickblue
dazby wrote:Stones is absolutely world class. What a player.
I was going to post that in the match thread, but thought it would get lost amongst the doom and gloom.
He was sensational today.
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Sun Oct 02, 2016 5:40 pm
by Nigels Tackle
patrickblue wrote:dazby wrote:Stones is absolutely world class. What a player.
I was going to post that in the match thread, but thought it would get lost amongst the doom and gloom.
He was sensational today.
imagine him alongside alderweireld
and i said we should have signed wanyama 5 years ago
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Sun Oct 02, 2016 6:44 pm
by craigmcfc
Easy. John Stones.
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Mon Oct 03, 2016 5:44 am
by RodneyRodney
Rocky.Looks good enough to play in several positions.
HM Dinho.
The rest just not good enough.
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:46 am
by Herb
IMO Bravo deserved the plaudits - defenders didn't show for him on a number of occasions but his distribution was still better than we've known historically and 2-0 would've been 4-0 with a lesser keeper in net.
PS. This is an assessment of this particular game and not a pop at the blond clown so leave it out before you start foreverupjoesarse. Ta
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:47 am
by Foreverinbluedreams
Herb wrote:IMO Bravo deserved the plaudits - defenders didn't show for him on a number of occasions but his distribution was still better than we've known historically and 2-0 would've been 4-0 with a lesser keeper in net.
PS. This is an assessment of this particular game and not a pop at the blond clown so leave it out before you start foreverupjoesarse. Ta
Weirdo
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:05 am
by Herb
Haha You can't help but throw a bit of abuse in when you feel your wank sock might be under threat eh?
Now that IS weird!
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:08 am
by Foreverinbluedreams
Herb wrote:Haha You can't help but throw a bit of abuse in when you feel your wank sock might be under threat eh?
Now that IS weird!
Weirdo
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:18 am
by Herb
Haha you can't help but throw in some abuse when you feel your wank sock might be under threat. Can't fathom why you don't fuck off and support the mid-table shite team that he now fumbles for. Now that IS weird!
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:39 am
by Foreverinbluedreams
Herb wrote:Haha you can't help but throw in some abuse when you feel your wank sock might be under threat. Can't fathom why you don't fuck off and support the mid-table shite team that he now fumbles for. Now that IS weird!
Perhaps the fact that you're a fucking idiot would explain why you can't fathom it. Weirdo.
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:59 pm
by Original Dub
What an odd chap.
Completely obsessed.
Re: MotM v Spurs

Posted:
Mon Oct 03, 2016 4:28 pm
by Herb
Original Dub wrote:What an odd chap.
Completely obsessed.
Isn't he just eh? I think of foreverupjoesarse as being 'sad little gimp boy' because that sums him up and if you look at him for what he is it's kinda funny / less annoying. You should try it. It helps.