FA cup winners 2006 wrote:johnny crossan wrote:BlueinBosnia wrote:johnny crossan wrote:BlueinBosnia wrote:Anything - and I mean absolutely anything - Serbia does to commemorate its war dead will kick off some controversy in the Balkans, and often within Serbia itself, for being too nationalist/not nationalist enough, too inclusive/not inclusive enough - you name it, there'll be some group with their knickers in a twist about it. The fact that this flower symbol is related to the period of the Kingdom of Serbia (which was enlarged to become the Serbia-dominated Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes shortly after the Armistice, and later on the Kingdom of Yugoslavia) would exacerbate issues.
It's the same problem then and the same solution. These attempts at attacking a country's or a people's historical symbol venerating their fallen, on some political pretext or other, should be resisted. Remember Germany in the 30s where there was little opposition to graves with the Star of David being openly desecrated and daubed with swastikas. Betraying the memory those who sacrificed their lives in the service of your society and its values is never a good idea.
It was only adopted as a symbol 3 or 4 years ago, in a highly political move aimed to divert attention away from commemoration of the victory of the Partisans over Fascist forces in the Second World War. It came about 100% as the result of Serbia's present-day political scene, and at the same time serves exactly the same purpose as the poppy symbol in the UK, in commemorating war dead and creating a you're-either-with-us-or-against-us attitude among the populace.
So according to you the British Legion Red Poppy's purpose 'is creating a you're-either-with-us-or-against-us attitude among the populace.'
There seems no end to the to ulterior motives of a British charity that solely exists to honour the memory of those who gave their lives for their country and to provide financial, social and emotional support to members and veterans of the British Armed Forces, their families and dependants.
and no end to the poppycock on here eitherFA cup winners 2006 wrote:If it is true that the poppy is a symbol of remembrance then i assume that the money raised is split out amongst the communities directly effected.
Does the royal british legion collect all the money from the sale of the poppies?
Do they donate money to communities like Derry, Syria and Iraq?
The British armed forces members, veterans and their families from Londonderry are indeed supported by the British Legion, and there is also government support for for those suffering from the effects of war in Syria, Iraq and many other places whether we are directly involved in the conflicts or not.
So not the innocent men women and children killed by british forces in Derry on bloody sunday!
If it was a maintained as a remembrance symbol for what it was originally intended (ie. Remembrance for the soldiers lost or injured in world war 1) it would be acceptable world wide but when it is also used to remember soldiers who carried out illegal acts of murder on civilians then it is less palpable
The Bloody Sunday killings were terrible and completely unjustified and there have sadly been other dishonourable episodes in British history. Those atrocities committed by a few do not mean that the modern day Poppy Appeal should not be supported and all the heroism and sacrifices of our combatants in war recognised. Wars did not stop in 1918 or 1945 and as long as we call on the armed services to fight and die for us, they deserve our full support.