The mancityfans.net football forum

Thought it was West ham. Will we really sell him to that lot??

Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:I'd love to have him back. I know he isn't perfect by a long way, but at least he saves the odd shot

No denying it Piccs.
But if he takes to the Dippers like a dick to water how would you feel.
I don't know why but I could see Joe really loving being with his England buddies. Could be worse than Milner.
Speculation I know and I don't want to do the guy a disservice, but I don't see it beyond him to embrace all things candle vigilistic.

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:

Mase wrote:

CuteMancs wrote:According to a couple of callers on talkshite Joe has signed for dippers, just not been announced yet. I could see that happening if I am honest

I'll be seeing his mate on 28th so will ask him.

It might be all done and dusted by then Mase, bar the announcement.

According to the press at the time he went to Torino for the full season. Are they signing him early for next season, or is it mischief?

If it were me, I'd bring him home, and hug him and kiss him and never let him leave again.


Then I'd take Bravo out the back and shoot him.

Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:I'd love to have him back. I know he isn't perfect by a long way, but at least he saves the odd shot

But not low to his left.

He's still 9 times better than Bravo 3 Zero.

Dameerto wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:

Mase wrote:

CuteMancs wrote:According to a couple of callers on talkshite Joe has signed for dippers, just not been announced yet. I could see that happening if I am honest

I'll be seeing his mate on 28th so will ask him.

It might be all done and dusted by then Mase, bar the announcement.

According to the press at the time he went to Torino for the full season. Are they signing him early for next season, or is it mischief?

I posted that 6 months ago the wanker, would have joined the scum if De Gay had left, maybe some of the Hart Lickers get it now. Hart was a twat !

Hazy2 wrote:

Dameerto wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:

Mase wrote:

CuteMancs wrote:According to a couple of callers on talkshite Joe has signed for dippers, just not been announced yet. I could see that happening if I am honest

I'll be seeing his mate on 28th so will ask him.

It might be all done and dusted by then Mase, bar the announcement.

According to the press at the time he went to Torino for the full season. Are they signing him early for next season, or is it mischief?

I posted that 6 months ago the wanker, would have joined the scum if De Gay had left, maybe some of the Hart Lickers get it now. Hart was a twat !

Strange if he signs for the dippers given his alleged love for the rags, I didn't think he'd want to go their most bitter rivals.

Hart was very very close to joining Everton permanently in the summer but they pulled the plug at the very last minute without saying way.

It wouldn't surprise me if he went to Liverpool.

iwasthere2012 wrote:

Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:I'd love to have him back. I know he isn't perfect by a long way, but at least he saves the odd shot

No denying it Piccs.
But if he takes to the Dippers like a dick to water how would you feel.
I don't know why but I could see Joe really loving being with his England buddies. Could be worse than Milner.
Speculation I know and I don't want to do the guy a disservice, but I don't see it beyond him to embrace all things candle vigilistic.

Are you saying he would then be a "urine inveigler", with regard to City fans IWT ??

Mase wrote:Hart was very very close to joining Everton permanently in the summer but they pulled the plug at the very last minute without saying way.

It wouldn't surprise me if he went to Liverpool.

I'd be surprised if we sold him to the dippers.

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:

iwasthere2012 wrote:

Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:I'd love to have him back. I know he isn't perfect by a long way, but at least he saves the odd shot

No denying it Piccs.
But if he takes to the Dippers like a dick to water how would you feel.
I don't know why but I could see Joe really loving being with his England buddies. Could be worse than Milner.
Speculation I know and I don't want to do the guy a disservice, but I don't see it beyond him to embrace all things candle vigilistic.

Are you saying he would then be a "urine inveigler", with regard to City fans IWT ??

It's all speculation MC, so like I said, I rally don't want to tar and feather a guy for something he hasn't done or hasn't happened.

I just have never bought into the whole concept of Joe being City through and through. I think he is better than Bravo but neither of them are what we need.
I can't shake the feeling that he himself has as much to do with his exclusion from the squad and I think ultimately it may prove to be the right decision by Pep.
What we are suffering at the moment isn't the answer but hopefully it is temporary.

Joe strikes me as a good fit for the Dipper mentality. Just my opinion. Whether he would inveigle the urine with us or not? Who knows?
It wouldn't surprise me but let's hope it's nothing but speculation, eh?

iwasthere2012 wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:

iwasthere2012 wrote:

Piccsnumberoneblue wrote:I'd love to have him back. I know he isn't perfect by a long way, but at least he saves the odd shot

No denying it Piccs.
But if he takes to the Dippers like a dick to water how would you feel.
I don't know why but I could see Joe really loving being with his England buddies. Could be worse than Milner.
Speculation I know and I don't want to do the guy a disservice, but I don't see it beyond him to embrace all things candle vigilistic.

Are you saying he would then be a "urine inveigler", with regard to City fans IWT ??

It's all speculation MC, so like I said, I rally don't want to tar and feather a guy for something he hasn't done or hasn't happened.

I just have never bought into the whole concept of Joe being City through and through. I think he is better than Bravo but neither of them are what we need.
I can't shake the feeling that he himself has as much to do with his exclusion from the squad and I think ultimately it may prove to be the right decision by Pep.
What we are suffering at the moment isn't the answer but hopefully it is temporary.

Joe strikes me as a good fit for the Dipper mentality. Just my opinion. Whether he would inveigle the urine with us or not? Who knows?
It wouldn't surprise me but let's hope it's nothing but speculation, eh?

It is what it is IWT and, at the end of the day, what will be will be.

If he does go to whomsoever, I'd just like to think we'd get more for him than the measly £20 million which has been quoted.

Surely he's worth more than that ??

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:
£20M Surely he's worth more than that ??

Current transfer value according to Transfrmarkt is £12.75M, having peaked at £20.4M in July 2013........ http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/joe-hart ... eler/40204

But i have to agree with Dameetro here, as far as i remember when he went as some on here were asking if we could have him back in January ourselves and i believe the answer is no, the loan expires 30th June 2017?

I'm no expert on loan deals though..........

CTID Hants wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:
£20M Surely he's worth more than that ??

Current transfer value according to Transfrmarkt is £12.75M, having peaked at £20.4M in July 2013........ http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/joe-hart ... eler/40204

But i have to agree with Dameetro here, as far as i remember when he went as some on here were asking if we could have him back in January ourselves and i believe the answer is no, the loan expires 30th June 2017?

I'm no expert on loan deals though..........

Surely we would ask for more than the £17m Bravo cost. God, it sounds so much worse when you realise what we paid for Bravo

nottsblue wrote:

CTID Hants wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:
£20M Surely he's worth more than that ??

Current transfer value according to Transfrmarkt is £12.75M, having peaked at £20.4M in July 2013........ http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/joe-hart ... eler/40204

But i have to agree with Dameetro here, as far as i remember when he went as some on here were asking if we could have him back in January ourselves and i believe the answer is no, the loan expires 30th June 2017?

I'm no expert on loan deals though..........

Surely we would ask for more than the £17m Bravo cost. God, it sounds so much worse when you realise what we paid for Bravo

You're right NB.

It all seem a bit frightening, especially if you turn it round and imagine that City were the ones wanting to buy him from another Club. What would we be expected to pay in such circumstances ??

nottsblue wrote:

CTID Hants wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:
£20M Surely he's worth more than that ??

Current transfer value according to Transfrmarkt is £12.75M, having peaked at £20.4M in July 2013........ http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/joe-hart ... eler/40204

But i have to agree with Dameetro here, as far as i remember when he went as some on here were asking if we could have him back in January ourselves and i believe the answer is no, the loan expires 30th June 2017?

I'm no expert on loan deals though..........

Surely we would ask for more than the £17m Bravo cost. God, it sounds so much worse when you realise what we paid for Bravo

On what basis would we ask for more than what Bravo cost? Age perhaps but aside from that Bravo has been outperforming Joe at both club and international level for the last few years before he signed for City.

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:

nottsblue wrote:

CTID Hants wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:
£20M Surely he's worth more than that ??

Current transfer value according to Transfrmarkt is £12.75M, having peaked at £20.4M in July 2013........ http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/joe-hart ... eler/40204

But i have to agree with Dameetro here, as far as i remember when he went as some on here were asking if we could have him back in January ourselves and i believe the answer is no, the loan expires 30th June 2017?

I'm no expert on loan deals though..........

Surely we would ask for more than the £17m Bravo cost. God, it sounds so much worse when you realise what we paid for Bravo

On what basis would we ask for more than what Bravo cost? Age perhaps but aside from that Bravo has been outperforming Joe at both club and international level for the last few years before he signed for City.

Both very experienced International goalkeepers who have been number one for their respective countries for a good time. Should a PL club be interested, ie dippers, then there's the premium right there. I grant you, a move abroad and we are unlikely to see more than £12/15m as there isn't the money that the PL has

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:

nottsblue wrote:

CTID Hants wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:
£20M Surely he's worth more than that ??

Current transfer value according to Transfrmarkt is £12.75M, having peaked at £20.4M in July 2013........ http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/joe-hart ... eler/40204

But i have to agree with Dameetro here, as far as i remember when he went as some on here were asking if we could have him back in January ourselves and i believe the answer is no, the loan expires 30th June 2017?

I'm no expert on loan deals though..........

Surely we would ask for more than the £17m Bravo cost. God, it sounds so much worse when you realise what we paid for Bravo

You're right NB.

It all seem a bit frightening, especially if you turn it round and imagine that City were the ones wanting to buy him from another Club. What would we be expected to pay in such circumstances ??

We would probably part with £20m+ I'd imagine

nottsblue wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:

nottsblue wrote:

CTID Hants wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:
£20M Surely he's worth more than that ??

Current transfer value according to Transfrmarkt is £12.75M, having peaked at £20.4M in July 2013........ http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/joe-hart ... eler/40204

But i have to agree with Dameetro here, as far as i remember when he went as some on here were asking if we could have him back in January ourselves and i believe the answer is no, the loan expires 30th June 2017?

I'm no expert on loan deals though..........

Surely we would ask for more than the £17m Bravo cost. God, it sounds so much worse when you realise what we paid for Bravo

You're right NB.

It all seem a bit frightening, especially if you turn it round and imagine that City were the ones wanting to buy him from another Club. What would we be expected to pay in such circumstances ??

We would probably part with £20m+ I'd imagine

http://metro.co.uk/2016/12/14/mancheste ... n-6322461/

Looks like we are constant on doing shit moves for large amount of cash.

PeterParker wrote:
http://metro.co.uk/2016/12/14/mancheste ... n-6322461/

Looks like we are constant on doing shit moves for large amount of cash.

"City have been on a poor run of form lately as a direct consequence of Bravo’s weak displays between the sticks"

What a pile of shite.