freshie wrote:Every time I watch him play for Spurs I am more and more impressed by him. Can't believe we let him go to Burnley a few seasons ago, although you could argue his game has developed since then. With him not being a first-choice RB for Spurs I don't see why we shouldn't make a bid for him in the summer. Definitely think he would walk into out first XI
Dubciteh wrote:freshie wrote:Every time I watch him play for Spurs I am more and more impressed by him. Can't believe we let him go to Burnley a few seasons ago, although you could argue his game has developed since then. With him not being a first-choice RB for Spurs I don't see why we shouldn't make a bid for him in the summer. Definitely think he would walk into out first XI
If he cant get into the spurs team, he shouldnt be able to get into ours, id be aiming a bit higher personally but can see your thinking.
As i watched Ben Mee win header after header yesterday i couldnt help but think he is more of a central defender than Otamendi.
Good to see all ex graduates do well, i do like to see that.
Dubciteh wrote:freshie wrote:Every time I watch him play for Spurs I am more and more impressed by him. Can't believe we let him go to Burnley a few seasons ago, although you could argue his game has developed since then. With him not being a first-choice RB for Spurs I don't see why we shouldn't make a bid for him in the summer. Definitely think he would walk into out first XI
If he cant get into the spurs team, he shouldnt be able to get into ours, id be aiming a bit higher personally but can see your thinking.
As i watched Ben Mee win header after header yesterday i couldnt help but think he is more of a central defender than Otamendi.
Good to see all ex graduates do well, i do like to see that.
freshie wrote:Dubciteh wrote:freshie wrote:Every time I watch him play for Spurs I am more and more impressed by him. Can't believe we let him go to Burnley a few seasons ago, although you could argue his game has developed since then. With him not being a first-choice RB for Spurs I don't see why we shouldn't make a bid for him in the summer. Definitely think he would walk into out first XI
If he cant get into the spurs team, he shouldnt be able to get into ours, id be aiming a bit higher personally but can see your thinking.
As i watched Ben Mee win header after header yesterday i couldnt help but think he is more of a central defender than Otamendi.
Good to see all ex graduates do well, i do like to see that.
I think he's better than Kyle Walker
Dubciteh wrote:freshie wrote:Every time I watch him play for Spurs I am more and more impressed by him. Can't believe we let him go to Burnley a few seasons ago, although you could argue his game has developed since then. With him not being a first-choice RB for Spurs I don't see why we shouldn't make a bid for him in the summer. Definitely think he would walk into out first XI
If he cant get into the spurs team, he shouldnt be able to get into ours, id be aiming a bit higher personally but can see your thinking.
As i watched Ben Mee win header after header yesterday i couldnt help but think he is more of a central defender than Otamendi.
Good to see all ex graduates do well, i do like to see that.
nottsblue wrote:Dubciteh wrote:freshie wrote:Every time I watch him play for Spurs I am more and more impressed by him. Can't believe we let him go to Burnley a few seasons ago, although you could argue his game has developed since then. With him not being a first-choice RB for Spurs I don't see why we shouldn't make a bid for him in the summer. Definitely think he would walk into out first XI
If he cant get into the spurs team, he shouldnt be able to get into ours, id be aiming a bit higher personally but can see your thinking.
As i watched Ben Mee win header after header yesterday i couldnt help but think he is more of a central defender than Otamendi.
Good to see all ex graduates do well, i do like to see that.
Not getting into the Spuds team is irrelevant as to whether he is a player we should or shouldn't sign. The question to ask of any potential signing is whether he can improve the present incumbent(s) in the relevant position or whether he would be an able deputy. Other factors such as age, nationality, ability to play in other positions, price all have a bearing on whether we sign a player.
As it happens, Trippier would be an improvement on both our present full backs. Whether he is at the level that we want is another matter. I am in agreement with you that I think we can do better but I don't believe we should stay away from a player just because he isn't a first team regular. He might be a player suited to our way of thinking but not his present clubs. Imagine if somehow Pulis got to manage David Silva, he would find a way to limit his output. Or imagine if Fabregas replaced bogbrush at the swamp
nottsblue wrote:Dubciteh wrote:freshie wrote:Every time I watch him play for Spurs I am more and more impressed by him. Can't believe we let him go to Burnley a few seasons ago, although you could argue his game has developed since then. With him not being a first-choice RB for Spurs I don't see why we shouldn't make a bid for him in the summer. Definitely think he would walk into out first XI
If he cant get into the spurs team, he shouldnt be able to get into ours, id be aiming a bit higher personally but can see your thinking.
As i watched Ben Mee win header after header yesterday i couldnt help but think he is more of a central defender than Otamendi.
Good to see all ex graduates do well, i do like to see that.
Not getting into the Spuds team is irrelevant as to whether he is a player we should or shouldn't sign. The question to ask of any potential signing is whether he can improve the present incumbent(s) in the relevant position or whether he would be an able deputy. Other factors such as age, nationality, ability to play in other positions, price all have a bearing on whether we sign a player.
As it happens, Trippier would be an improvement on both our present full backs. Whether he is at the level that we want is another matter. I am in agreement with you that I think we can do better but I don't believe we should stay away from a player just because he isn't a first team regular. He might be a player suited to our way of thinking but not his present clubs. Imagine if somehow Pulis got to manage David Silva, he would find a way to limit his output. Or imagine if Fabregas replaced bogbrush at the swamp
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I watched plenty of Tripp as a junior and he had lost of qualities but I was never sure of his defensive abiliries. Still not form what I have seen since but there is no doubt he has attacking qualities and is a fantastic crosser of a ball.
Hazy2 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I watched plenty of Tripp as a junior and he had lost of qualities but I was never sure of his defensive abiliries. Still not form what I have seen since but there is no doubt he has attacking qualities and is a fantastic crosser of a ball.
Full backs and defending are a thing of the past, Pep will not want defensive fbacks he wants 50 games a season athletes who can deal with a man and a situation if need be.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I watched plenty of Tripp as a junior and he had lost of qualities but I was never sure of his defensive abiliries. Still not form what I have seen since but there is no doubt he has attacking qualities and is a fantastic crosser of a ball.
Full backs and defending are a thing of the past, Pep will not want defensive fbacks he wants 50 games a season athletes who can deal with a man and a situation if need be.
Being ONLY able to defend as a full back might be a thing of the past but it's still important to be able to defend.
"who can deal with a man and a situation" sounds like being able to defend to me:)
Mase wrote:Watched him since he was 7 playing for the local kids team in Bury. He's class and was years younger than the kids he was playing with at the time.
If we're going for a right back though I'd rather have Bellerin.
Barca have opened talks with Arse today for him. Come on Pep.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I watched plenty of Tripp as a junior and he had lost of qualities but I was never sure of his defensive abiliries. Still not form what I have seen since but there is no doubt he has attacking qualities and is a fantastic crosser of a ball.
Full backs and defending are a thing of the past, Pep will not want defensive fbacks he wants 50 games a season athletes who can deal with a man and a situation if need be.
Being ONLY able to defend as a full back might be a thing of the past but it's still important to be able to defend.
"who can deal with a man and a situation" sounds like being able to defend to me:)
Hazy2 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I watched plenty of Tripp as a junior and he had lost of qualities but I was never sure of his defensive abiliries. Still not form what I have seen since but there is no doubt he has attacking qualities and is a fantastic crosser of a ball.
Full backs and defending are a thing of the past, Pep will not want defensive fbacks he wants 50 games a season athletes who can deal with a man and a situation if need be.
Being ONLY able to defend as a full back might be a thing of the past but it's still important to be able to defend.
"who can deal with a man and a situation" sounds like being able to defend to me:)
Name the fullbacks who put defending 1st, or the coaches who want Back4s to defend first and formost, Spurs have lead the way in that the two Belgians cope better than anyone do Walker and Rose defend, Davies and Trip come in and bomb on. I get the defending bit Doug, Football at City next year will be wide men up and down and 2,3 pushing on. Pep is not looking defenders he is after creators.
Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Douglas Higginbottom wrote:I watched plenty of Tripp as a junior and he had lost of qualities but I was never sure of his defensive abiliries. Still not form what I have seen since but there is no doubt he has attacking qualities and is a fantastic crosser of a ball.
Full backs and defending are a thing of the past, Pep will not want defensive fbacks he wants 50 games a season athletes who can deal with a man and a situation if need be.
Being ONLY able to defend as a full back might be a thing of the past but it's still important to be able to defend.
"who can deal with a man and a situation" sounds like being able to defend to me:)
Name the fullbacks who put defending 1st, or the coaches who want Back4s to defend first and formost, Spurs have lead the way in that the two Belgians cope better than anyone do Walker and Rose defend, Davies and Trip come in and bomb on. I get the defending bit Doug, Football at City next year will be wide men up and down and 2,3 pushing on. Pep is not looking defenders he is after creators.
I actually think Rose is a decent defender. Walker is a bit thick as a defender but because he is very quick he gets by quite well. If Pep doesn't want defenders then Zaba can just carry on because he is quite clever attacking. Trouble is he is slow and has no powers of recovery. I can get that it's more and more about getting up and down but Kolarov can do that but you wouldn't want to have him as a left back would you? Thus there needs to be defensive qualities in the full back even if it's just a combination of pace and endless energy to get back
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: BlueinBosnia, carl_feedthegoat, gmercer1, Google [Bot], Mase, nottsblue, Scatman and 109 guests