The mancityfans.net football forum

Chinners wrote:Sanchez is a cracking player that would get in any team in europe, however I do not think he is a City type player in our squad at present tbh

We need him anyway but a bad injury to Jesus, Aguero, Sane or Sterling and MC, S4e et al would soon be changing their tune along with you Chinners

Chinners wrote:Sanchez is a cracking player that would get in any team in europe, however I do not think he is a City type player in our squad at present tbh

He would have to adapt his game as hes a greedy cunt and likes to hold the ball - we play fast pass fast .

Holding the ball up ion the wings or back to the goal will not be accepted.

He needs us more than we need him. Let him stew until the summer.

johnny crossan wrote:

Chinners wrote:Sanchez is a cracking player that would get in any team in europe, however I do not think he is a City type player in our squad at present tbh

We need him anyway but a bad injury to Jesus, Aguero, Sane or Sterling and MC, S4e et al would soon be changing their tune along with you Chinners

Hell, You drive me at touching wood or more personal belongings as in use in our less mannered places!
You know I hold Your [Tory leaning ] football nose in utmost respect, I was serious when saying U'd make a better DoF than any Catalan charlatan, and it's not that I dont see Your point here: the cunt holds an established reputation at delivering the sphere on the net!
But why on hell taking the risks of a potential undermining of the almost perfect ethos we have finally achieved??? [and as long suffering Blue You are well aware of what it meant to the Club, and how difficult has been job of establishing such ethos, from Mancini onwards]
Trajectory (another word that earned its pkace in our history) of minimazing the waste of chances is already there to be seen, work in progress yet, but let Pep works on Raz, Leroy and Sergio (among others) further more: You know that ruthless is coming closer.
And For what then: three years at best? very weak return with quite an odd risk/benefit balance.

Nah... Your point is weak leaning to bleak and You know it: assumed shortage is an alternative (in pure WH lexicon) fact: we are faring well with the only real shortage we have (defenders, LB in particular)... finishers, out of Sergio, Jesus, Raheem, Leroy and contingently even Brahim Diaz (the one who polished RM top corner of crossingposts, You know) shall never run short. which, in turn, also absorbes the rethorical effort of putting a jinx into equation...

Nah, my friend, once in a while You'd better surrender the case.

Swales4ever wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:

Chinners wrote:Sanchez is a cracking player that would get in any team in europe, however I do not think he is a City type player in our squad at present tbh

We need him anyway but a bad injury to Jesus, Aguero, Sane or Sterling and MC, S4e et al would soon be changing their tune along with you Chinners

Hell, You drive me at touching wood or more personal belongings as in use in our less mannered places!
You know I hold Your [Tory leaning ] football nose in utmost respect, I was serious when saying U'd make a better DoF than any Catalan charlatan, and it's not that I dont see Your point here: the cunt holds an established reputation at delivering the sphere on the net!
But why on hell taking the risks of a potential undermining of the almost perfect ethos we have finally achieved??? [and as long suffering Blue You are well aware of what it meant to the Club, and how difficult has been job of establishing such ethos, from Mancini onwards]
Trajectory (another word that earned its pkace in our history) of minimazing the waste of chances is already there to be seen, work in progress yet, but let Pep works on Raz, Leroy and Sergio (among others) further more: You know that ruthless is coming closer.
And For what then: three years at best? very weak return with quite an odd risk/benefit balance.

Nah... Your point is weak leaning to bleak and You know it: assumed shortage is an alternative (in pure WH lexicon) fact: we are faring well with the only real shortage we have (defenders, LB in particular)... finishers, out of Sergio, Jesus, Raheem, Leroy and contingently even Brahim Diaz (the one who polished RM top corner of crossingposts, You know) shall never run short. which, in turn, also absorbes the rethorical effort of putting a jinx into equation...

Nah, my friend, once in a while You'd better surrender the case.

You're spreading yourself very thin across these subjects S4e

considering how far I am from giving evidence to have served that sentence... I must walk on easier paths. right!

johnny crossan wrote:

Chinners wrote:Sanchez is a cracking player that would get in any team in europe, however I do not think he is a City type player in our squad at present tbh

We need him anyway but a bad injury to Jesus, Aguero, Sane or Sterling and MC, S4e et al would soon be changing their tune along with you Chinners

In such circumstances, I wouldn't be changing my tune JC, because my original song last summer was that we needed two more strikers, neither of them being Sanchez.

Being brutally frank, I don't think he's either right, or even good enough for City. We're not Arsenal.

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:

Chinners wrote:Sanchez is a cracking player that would get in any team in europe, however I do not think he is a City type player in our squad at present tbh

We need him anyway but a bad injury to Jesus, Aguero, Sane or Sterling and MC, S4e et al would soon be changing their tune along with you Chinners

In such circumstances, I wouldn't be changing my tune JC, because my original song last summer was that we needed two more strikers, neither of them being Sanchez.

Being brutally frank, I don't think he's either right, or even good enough for City. We're not Arsenal.

Strong stuff MC - and carl said you were the nicest chap on forum as well

johnny crossan wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:

Chinners wrote:Sanchez is a cracking player that would get in any team in europe, however I do not think he is a City type player in our squad at present tbh

We need him anyway but a bad injury to Jesus, Aguero, Sane or Sterling and MC, S4e et al would soon be changing their tune along with you Chinners

In such circumstances, I wouldn't be changing my tune JC, because my original song last summer was that we needed two more strikers, neither of them being Sanchez.

Being brutally frank, I don't think he's either right, or even good enough for City. We're not Arsenal.

Strong stuff MC - and carl said you were the nicest chap on forum as well

Frank’s his alter ego.

johnny crossan wrote:

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:

Chinners wrote:Sanchez is a cracking player that would get in any team in europe, however I do not think he is a City type player in our squad at present tbh

We need him anyway but a bad injury to Jesus, Aguero, Sane or Sterling and MC, S4e et al would soon be changing their tune along with you Chinners

In such circumstances, I wouldn't be changing my tune JC, because my original song last summer was that we needed two more strikers, neither of them being Sanchez.

Being brutally frank, I don't think he's either right, or even good enough for City. We're not Arsenal.

Strong stuff MC - and carl said you were the nicest chap on forum as well

We all know JC, that Carl is nothing if not a smooth talking flatterer

Wasn't too bothered. But love to see him signed now Just to prove all the negative naysayers wrong....

sheblue wrote:Wasn't too bothered. But love to see him signed now Just to prove all the negative naysayers wrong....

coming from You, I am seriously interested... would You kindly expand on that notion of "negative naysayers"?
I'm mean, what negative in feeling the team better restrain from getting into unecessary/little adding risks, as per my drivels above and a few others' more concise and better phrased opinions?

honest.

Swales4ever wrote:

sheblue wrote:Wasn't too bothered. But love to see him signed now Just to prove all the negative naysayers wrong....

coming from You, I am seriously interested... would You kindly expand on that notion of "negative naysayers"?
I'm mean, what negative in feeling the team better restrain from getting into unecessary/little adding risks, as per my drivels above and a few others' more concise and better phrased opinions?

honest.

Only one opinion is allowed apparently.

After what Wenger has said last weekend I’d sign him just to piss that nonce off. Fuck it I’d tap up anyone they tried signing ever again!

Mase wrote:After what Wenger has said last weekend I’d sign him just to piss that nonce off. Fuck it I’d tap up anyone they tried signing ever again!

Happy birthday Mase. Have a great day mate

nottsblue wrote:

Mase wrote:After what Wenger has said last weekend I’d sign him just to piss that nonce off. Fuck it I’d tap up anyone they tried signing ever again!

Happy birthday Mase. Have a great day mate

Nice one mate.

Tokyo Blue wrote:

Swales4ever wrote:

sheblue wrote:Wasn't too bothered. But love to see him signed now Just to prove all the negative naysayers wrong....

coming from You, I am seriously interested... would You kindly expand on that notion of "negative naysayers"?
I'm mean, what negative in feeling the team better restrain from getting into unecessary/little adding risks, as per my drivels above and a few others' more concise and better phrased opinions?

honest.

Only one opinion is allowed apparently.

Absolutely

Is Mase havin a proper Wigan pie birthday tea ?

How do people know who'e birthday is when?
happy Birthday by the way Mase.

iwasthere2012 wrote:How do people know who'e birthday is when?
happy Birthday by the way Mase.

Click on the Board Index tab