The mancityfans.net football forum

I can see the ads now

"why waste time going to a top doctor when you can phone an Argentinean doctor for free?
That's right, you don't even need to be in the same room... AND you'll get a more accurate assessment"

I'm in. What's his number??

iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?

Isn't that an Underworld song?

dazby wrote:

iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?

Isn't that an Underworld song?

Hang on.

iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?

Snoopy's less than enthusiastic brother.

Sloop has all the moves

Peter Doherty (AGAIG) wrote:Sloop has all the moves

Watch on youtube.com

Well PD, Sloopy does live in the very bad part of town after all.

iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?

it may well actually be sloppy, meaning slack or loose.
and tell me IWT mate, teacher to pupil, what's cocksucker?

glad I've been able to bring my two cents to "the Int'nal break boredom relief initiative". [nothing to compare to the terrific sharing by DD, obviously]
looks like with just that little I managed to reach out either "Down Under" and "Up Over"...

can't afford a single reply to everyone, think it'd be detrimental to the thread, but everyone please get my best "ecumenical" effort through a big hug.

Swales4ever wrote:

iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?

it may well actually be sloppy, meaning slack or loose.
and tell me IWT mate, teacher to pupil, what's cocksucker?

glad I've been able to bring my two cents to "the Int'nal break boredom relief initiative". [nothing to compare to the terrific sharing by DD, obviously]
looks like with just that little I managed to reach out either "Down Under" and "Up Over"...

can't afford a single reply to everyone, think it'd be detrimental to the thread, but everyone please get my best "ecumenical" effort through a big hug.

Sorry, am I being told off here?
It's hard to tell.

iwasthere2012 wrote:

Swales4ever wrote:

iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?

it may well actually be sloppy, meaning slack or loose.
and tell me IWT mate, teacher to pupil, what's cocksucker?

glad I've been able to bring my two cents to "the Int'nal break boredom relief initiative". [nothing to compare to the terrific sharing by DD, obviously]
looks like with just that little I managed to reach out either "Down Under" and "Up Over"...

can't afford a single reply to everyone, think it'd be detrimental to the thread, but everyone please get my best "ecumenical" effort through a big hug.

Sorry, am I being told off here?
It's hard to tell.

nevermind, mate.

I just hoped I could have learned something.

Swales4ever wrote:

iwasthere2012 wrote:

Swales4ever wrote:

iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?

it may well actually be sloppy, meaning slack or loose.
and tell me IWT mate, teacher to pupil, what's cocksucker?

glad I've been able to bring my two cents to "the Int'nal break boredom relief initiative". [nothing to compare to the terrific sharing by DD, obviously]
looks like with just that little I managed to reach out either "Down Under" and "Up Over"...

can't afford a single reply to everyone, think it'd be detrimental to the thread, but everyone please get my best "ecumenical" effort through a big hug.

Sorry, am I being told off here?
It's hard to tell.

nevermind, mate.

I just hoped I could have learned something.

Here's something to learn S4E; 'always take your mother-in-law some lettuce on a Sunday'.

Years ago, an old geezer I used to work with gave me that advice and it's stuck with me ever since.

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:

Swales4ever wrote:

iwasthere2012 wrote:

Swales4ever wrote:

iwasthere2012 wrote:What's 'sloopy'?

it may well actually be sloppy, meaning slack or loose.
and tell me IWT mate, teacher to pupil, what's cocksucker?

glad I've been able to bring my two cents to "the Int'nal break boredom relief initiative". [nothing to compare to the terrific sharing by DD, obviously]
looks like with just that little I managed to reach out either "Down Under" and "Up Over"...

can't afford a single reply to everyone, think it'd be detrimental to the thread, but everyone please get my best "ecumenical" effort through a big hug.

Sorry, am I being told off here?
It's hard to tell.

nevermind, mate.

I just hoped I could have learned something.

Here's something to learn S4E; 'always take your mother-in-law some lettuce on a Sunday'.

Years ago, an old geezer I used to work with gave me that advice and it's stuck with me ever since.

I use to take Your most welcomed advices in utmost consideration, MC.
It's just that this cannot apply as I belong to that category of cowards who have not fencied the idea of starting a family in such a disgraceful, hopeless world.

Could be back for tomorrow week against the Potters according to Sam Lee - along with Delph - hope so

johnny crossan wrote:Could be back for tomorrow week against the Potters according to Sam Lee - along with Delph - hope so

That's the same Sam Lee that told us Mendy was on the mendy an hour before we were told he would be out for 7 months. He hasn't got a fucking clue.

South Stand Balti wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:Could be back for tomorrow week against the Potters according to Sam Lee - along with Delph - hope so

That's the same Sam Lee that told us Mendy was on the mendy an hour before we were told he would be out for 7 months. He hasn't got a fucking clue.

He is probably the worst on twitter who tweets City stuff Balti lad . Bet Benidorm was bouncing with that City performance at Stamford Bridge pal ?

South Stand Balti wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:Could be back for tomorrow week against the Potters according to Sam Lee - along with Delph - hope so

That's the same Sam Lee that told us Mendy was on the mendy an hour before we were told he would be out for 7 months. He hasn't got a fucking clue.

Well there is that I suppose

South Stand Balti wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:Could be back for tomorrow week against the Potters according to Sam Lee - along with Delph - hope so

That's the same Sam Lee that told us Mendy was on the mendy an hour before we were told he would be out for 7 months. He hasn't got a fucking clue.

Well there is that I suppose

johnny crossan wrote:

South Stand Balti wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:Could be back for tomorrow week against the Potters according to Sam Lee - along with Delph - hope so

That's the same Sam Lee that told us Mendy was on the mendy an hour before we were told he would be out for 7 months. He hasn't got a fucking clue.

Well there is that I suppose

He 'could' be back. Then again i suppose he 'could' not. Actually he could fly to the moon if only he had a rocket. Really he could do anything....

City64 wrote:

South Stand Balti wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:Could be back for tomorrow week against the Potters according to Sam Lee - along with Delph - hope so

That's the same Sam Lee that told us Mendy was on the mendy an hour before we were told he would be out for 7 months. He hasn't got a fucking clue.

He is probably the worst on twitter who tweets City stuff Balti lad . Bet Benidorm was bouncing with that City performance at Stamford Bridge pal ?

Benidorm was bouncing. It really is a bonkers place but the City win at the start of it just gave it that bit extra. What a performance. I watched it on a massive screen with a few scoops next to the pool. Happy days!

Just read also that Milan rumour.

Would you sell him next summer for 100 mil if somebody would pay that much for him?

PeterParker wrote:Just read also that Milan rumour.

Would you sell him next summer for 100 mil if somebody would pay that much for him?

We are in a luxury position of never having to sell. If we don't need the money, why would we entertain any bid no matter how ridiculous