The mancityfans.net football forum

Apparently we are close to signing a deal with Puma for £50m. Who else wears Puma kits?

All in one?

i scored some cracking goals in my puma hat trick boots.

Then when i was older switched to adidas , never looked back.

It’s like in “The tin men” when Danny De Vito recognised that the VW beetle is the future.

What is it with these Germans ? quality everywhere .

Hope this is true. Love the arsenal kits.

I don't think I'll be alone in being concerned about the tight fit of their current shirts. Unless they do a baggier fit for fans

A quick look on the Arsenal website and all is good. £100 for an authentic one for those with the toned six pack. £55 for the rest of us

craigmcfc wrote:A quick look on the Arsenal website and all is good. £100 for an authentic one for those with the toned six pack. £55 for the rest of us

I won't be paying £100 for a shirt!

How much!!!

Isn't our current deal peanuts compared, think it's only about £12 mil.

Beefymcfc wrote:How much!!!

Isn't our current deal peanuts compared, think it's only about £12 mil.

DM article says £20m.

Justified logic wrote:

Beefymcfc wrote:How much!!!

Isn't our current deal peanuts compared, think it's only about £12 mil.

DM article says £20m.

I'm sure it was reported as 12 at the time so may have gone up incrementally. Either way, it's a huge leap with regard to revenue and also says that we are set for the future.

More importantly- Nike are absolute turd!! Be well glad to see the back of them.

can't wait to see pep in one of those wenger duvet coats

Beefymcfc wrote:

Justified logic wrote:

Beefymcfc wrote:How much!!!

Isn't our current deal peanuts compared, think it's only about £12 mil.

DM article says £20m.

I'm sure it was reported as 12 at the time so may have gone up incrementally. Either way, it's a huge leap with regard to revenue and also says that we are set for the future.

Yes, it was reported as £12m back in 2012. Mirror also said £20m this May so either it has gone up incrementally (or has bonuses attached) or the media have pulled a figure out of the air and are then using one another's figure. Anyone's guess as to which.

Mase wrote:More importantly- Nike are absolute turd!! Be well glad to see the back of them.

Absolutely. One design fits all inferior shite.

Absolutely hate Puma kits. Hate all Puma gear in fact. I was hoping we were going to go with Under Armour.

ayrshireblue wrote:Absolutely hate Puma kits. Hate all Puma gear in fact. I was hoping we were going to go with Under Armour.

under armour?! possibly the shittest sports brand since bukta.

Nigels Tackle wrote:

ayrshireblue wrote:Absolutely hate Puma kits. Hate all Puma gear in fact. I was hoping we were going to go with Under Armour.

under armour?! possibly the shittest sports brand since bukta.

I bought a T shirt yesterday- it looks fuckign great on me.

carl_feedthegoat wrote:

Nigels Tackle wrote:

ayrshireblue wrote:Absolutely hate Puma kits. Hate all Puma gear in fact. I was hoping we were going to go with Under Armour.

under armour?! possibly the shittest sports brand since bukta.

I bought a T shirt yesterday- it looks fuckign great on me.

case closed.

£50m a year. Tidy. And not a sniff of false sponsorship.

Whether we will catch the rags in terms of turnover is probably unlikely given their fan base worldwide, but we are hopefully narrowing the gap whilst putting more distance between us and the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal and Dippers.

FFP? Stick it up your fucking backside, it now means fuck all to us