Puma

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: Puma

Postby BlueinBosnia » Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:37 pm

nottsblue wrote:£50m a year. Tidy. And not a sniff of false sponsorship.

Whether we will catch the rags in terms of turnover is probably unlikely given their fan base worldwide, but we are hopefully narrowing the gap whilst putting more distance between us and the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal and Dippers.

FFP? Stick it up your fucking backside, it now means fuck all to us

Fan base doesn't mean anything in terms of turnover if your 'fans' don't spend money on club products. What proportion of Rag supporters have ever spent money on merchandise that the club receives any cash from, I wonder?
"Ferguson. Žvaka kurac."
(Ferguson. Chewing-gum cock.)
Old man in a bar in rural Bosnia.
User avatar
BlueinBosnia
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10604
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 3:43 pm
Location: Sarajevo, BiH
Supporter of: Team Bridge

Re: Puma

Postby Mikhail Chigorin » Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:38 pm

ayrshireblue wrote:Absolutely hate Puma kits. Hate all Puma gear in fact. I was hoping we were going to go with Under Armour.


Would that then be Krupps cemented armour or Krupps non cemented ?? :roll: :roll:

(........apologies for the nerdy reference to World War II warships, but I just couldn't resist it :oops: :oops: ).
Mikhail Chigorin
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7933
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:37 pm
Location: Lost in the variations of the King's Gambit
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Bert Trautmann

Re: Puma

Postby nottsblue » Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:45 pm

BlueinBosnia wrote:
nottsblue wrote:£50m a year. Tidy. And not a sniff of false sponsorship.

Whether we will catch the rags in terms of turnover is probably unlikely given their fan base worldwide, but we are hopefully narrowing the gap whilst putting more distance between us and the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal and Dippers.

FFP? Stick it up your fucking backside, it now means fuck all to us

Fan base doesn't mean anything in terms of turnover if your 'fans' don't spend money on club products. What proportion of Rag supporters have ever spent money on merchandise that the club receives any cash from, I wonder?

But in this digital age with clubs having Facebook accounts and the like, the more clicks/hits they get on these sites the more revenue will be generated. Fans in Africa or Asia might not buy much official merchandise but they will register and use digital technology
nottsblue
Colin Bell's Football Brain
 
Posts: 29572
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 5:17 pm
Location: Nottingham
Supporter of: manchester city
My favourite player is: niall Quinn & Kun

Re: Puma

Postby Mikhail Chigorin » Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:48 pm

nottsblue wrote:
BlueinBosnia wrote:
nottsblue wrote:£50m a year. Tidy. And not a sniff of false sponsorship.

Whether we will catch the rags in terms of turnover is probably unlikely given their fan base worldwide, but we are hopefully narrowing the gap whilst putting more distance between us and the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal and Dippers.

FFP? Stick it up your fucking backside, it now means fuck all to us

Fan base doesn't mean anything in terms of turnover if your 'fans' don't spend money on club products. What proportion of Rag supporters have ever spent money on merchandise that the club receives any cash from, I wonder?

But in this digital age with clubs having Facebook accounts and the like, the more clicks/hits they get on these sites the more revenue will be generated. Fans in Africa or Asia might not buy much official merchandise but they will register and use digital technology


You're right NB; as the Tesco advert says/said "Every little helps".
Mikhail Chigorin
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7933
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:37 pm
Location: Lost in the variations of the King's Gambit
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Bert Trautmann

Re: Puma

Postby City64 » Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:51 pm

I agree with other posters that Nike is shit and good riddance . Be good if Puma just stick with our iconic red and black stripes and Purple away kits plus obviously a proper upgrade on our laser blue / sky blue whatever its fucking called home kit . Most of them kits Nike came up with were utter dross imho
Not really here

Fuck VAR
User avatar
City64
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10741
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:02 pm
Location: Urmston, Shevington , The Etihad , In a bar anywhere watching MCFC
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: Puma

Postby Mase » Sat Nov 25, 2017 7:33 pm

Image
Mase
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 38866
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: The North Pole.
Supporter of: Warnock's Ref Rants
My favourite player is: Danny Tiatto

Re: Puma

Postby Hutch's Shoulder » Sat Nov 25, 2017 8:36 pm

If we can just sport the website out as well, job's a good 'in.
User avatar
Hutch's Shoulder
Dickov's Injury Time Equaliser
 
Posts: 4424
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:55 am
Location: Wild country near Glossop
Supporter of: City of course
My favourite player is: David Silva

Re: Puma

Postby craigmcfc » Sat Nov 25, 2017 8:50 pm

I'd settle for something that was unique to City and not, as other people have said, our version of a 'one pattern fits all' template.

Not much to ask really.
craigmcfc
Paul Power's Tash
 
Posts: 10837
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:39 am
Location: Halifax
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Sergio Aguero

Re: Puma

Postby patrickblue » Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:54 pm

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:
ayrshireblue wrote:Absolutely hate Puma kits. Hate all Puma gear in fact. I was hoping we were going to go with Under Armour.


Would that then be Krupps cemented armour or Krupps non cemented ?? :roll: :roll:

(........apologies for the nerdy reference to World War II warships, but I just couldn't resist it :oops: :oops: ).


I knew that was you before I even looked.
You and I are probably the only two people in the world sad enough to know what Krupps non cemented armour was.
[img]https://giphy.com/gifs/3o7qDYcso3azifQVyg/html5[/img]
User avatar
patrickblue
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7129
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:49 pm
Location: Newbury Berks
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: The one and only Goat

Re: Puma

Postby dazby » Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:21 am

Where is LAHAD when you need him?
Attack the argument of the person, not the person of the argument- except Carl.
User avatar
dazby
Joe Mercer's OBE
 
Posts: 19305
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:02 am
Location: Brisbane Australia
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Ed

Re: Puma

Postby Dameerto » Sun Nov 26, 2017 1:30 pm

london blue 2 wrote:All in one?

We're playing in onesies next season?? That would be some outfit. I'd probably buy one as well.
VIVA EL CITIES

"The adjudicatory chamber of the Ethics Committee ... has banned Mr Joseph S. Blatter ... for eight years and Mr Michel Platini ... for eight years from all football-related activities (administrative, sports or any other) on a national and international level. The bans come into force immediately." - 21/12/2015
User avatar
Dameerto
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18703
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:08 pm
Supporter of: El City
My favourite player is: Sergio Forwardo

Re: Puma

Postby Mikhail Chigorin » Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:53 pm

patrickblue wrote:
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:
ayrshireblue wrote:Absolutely hate Puma kits. Hate all Puma gear in fact. I was hoping we were going to go with Under Armour.


Would that then be Krupps cemented armour or Krupps non cemented ?? :roll: :roll:

(........apologies for the nerdy reference to World War II warships, but I just couldn't resist it :oops: :oops: ).


I knew that was you before I even looked.
You and I are probably the only two people in the world sad enough to know what Krupps non cemented armour was.


You're a splendid fellow PB, of that there is no doubt :) :)
Mikhail Chigorin
Shaun Goater's 103 Goals
 
Posts: 7933
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 5:37 pm
Location: Lost in the variations of the King's Gambit
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Bert Trautmann

Re: Puma

Postby Mase » Tue Dec 26, 2017 9:26 am

Apparently our Nike contract doesn’t end until 18/19 season. So we’ve got another season of Nike FFS!
Mase
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 38866
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: The North Pole.
Supporter of: Warnock's Ref Rants
My favourite player is: Danny Tiatto

Re: Puma

Postby Karenc » Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:41 am

Mikhail Chigorin wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
BlueinBosnia wrote:
nottsblue wrote:£50m a year. Tidy. And not a sniff of false sponsorship.

Whether we will catch the rags in terms of turnover is probably unlikely given their fan base worldwide, but we are hopefully narrowing the gap whilst putting more distance between us and the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal and Dippers.

FFP? Stick it up your fucking backside, it now means fuck all to us

Fan base doesn't mean anything in terms of turnover if your 'fans' don't spend money on club products. What proportion of Rag supporters have ever spent money on merchandise that the club receives any cash from, I wonder?

But in this digital age with clubs having Facebook accounts and the like, the more clicks/hits they get on these sites the more revenue will be generated. Fans in Africa or Asia might not buy much official merchandise but they will register and use digital technology


You're right NB; as the Tesco advert says/said "Every little helps".


Hi, Just wondering if maybe you would take part in my short survey about merchandise in the English Premier League, for my final year project I would be very grateful for your help :) https://goo.gl/forms/XCfnkstjNg2iqGKl2
Karenc
Bianchi's Matchday Snood
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:27 pm
Gender: Female
Supporter of: Man city

Previous

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: belleebee, Bluemoon4610, city72, Majestic-12 [Bot], nottsblue, Sparklehorse and 220 guests