Page 2 of 2
Re: Puma
Posted:
Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:37 pmby BlueinBosnia
nottsblue wrote:£50m a year. Tidy. And not a sniff of false sponsorship.
Whether we will catch the rags in terms of turnover is probably unlikely given their fan base worldwide, but we are hopefully narrowing the gap whilst putting more distance between us and the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal and Dippers.
FFP? Stick it up your fucking backside, it now means fuck all to us
Fan base doesn't mean anything in terms of turnover if your 'fans' don't spend money on club products. What proportion of Rag supporters have ever spent money on merchandise that the club receives any cash from, I wonder?
Re: Puma
Posted:
Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:38 pmby Mikhail Chigorin
ayrshireblue wrote:Absolutely hate Puma kits. Hate all Puma gear in fact. I was hoping we were going to go with Under Armour.
Would that then be Krupps cemented armour or Krupps non cemented ??
(........apologies for the nerdy reference to World War II warships, but I just couldn't resist it
).
Re: Puma
Posted:
Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:45 pmby nottsblue
BlueinBosnia wrote:nottsblue wrote:£50m a year. Tidy. And not a sniff of false sponsorship.
Whether we will catch the rags in terms of turnover is probably unlikely given their fan base worldwide, but we are hopefully narrowing the gap whilst putting more distance between us and the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal and Dippers.
FFP? Stick it up your fucking backside, it now means fuck all to us
Fan base doesn't mean anything in terms of turnover if your 'fans' don't spend money on club products. What proportion of Rag supporters have ever spent money on merchandise that the club receives any cash from, I wonder?
But in this digital age with clubs having Facebook accounts and the like, the more clicks/hits they get on these sites the more revenue will be generated. Fans in Africa or Asia might not buy much official merchandise but they will register and use digital technology
Re: Puma
Posted:
Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:48 pmby Mikhail Chigorin
nottsblue wrote:BlueinBosnia wrote:nottsblue wrote:£50m a year. Tidy. And not a sniff of false sponsorship.
Whether we will catch the rags in terms of turnover is probably unlikely given their fan base worldwide, but we are hopefully narrowing the gap whilst putting more distance between us and the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal and Dippers.
FFP? Stick it up your fucking backside, it now means fuck all to us
Fan base doesn't mean anything in terms of turnover if your 'fans' don't spend money on club products. What proportion of Rag supporters have ever spent money on merchandise that the club receives any cash from, I wonder?
But in this digital age with clubs having Facebook accounts and the like, the more clicks/hits they get on these sites the more revenue will be generated. Fans in Africa or Asia might not buy much official merchandise but they will register and use digital technology
You're right NB; as the Tesco advert says/said "Every little helps".
Re: Puma
Posted:
Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:51 pmby City64
I agree with other posters that Nike is shit and good riddance . Be good if Puma just stick with our iconic red and black stripes and Purple away kits plus obviously a proper upgrade on our laser blue / sky blue whatever its fucking called home kit . Most of them kits Nike came up with were utter dross imho
Re: Puma
Posted:
Sat Nov 25, 2017 7:33 pmby Mase
Re: Puma
Posted:
Sat Nov 25, 2017 8:36 pmby Hutch's Shoulder
If we can just sport the website out as well, job's a good 'in.
Re: Puma
Posted:
Sat Nov 25, 2017 8:50 pmby craigmcfc
I'd settle for something that was unique to City and not, as other people have said, our version of a 'one pattern fits all' template.
Not much to ask really.
Re: Puma
Posted:
Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:54 pmby patrickblue
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:ayrshireblue wrote:Absolutely hate Puma kits. Hate all Puma gear in fact. I was hoping we were going to go with Under Armour.
Would that then be Krupps cemented armour or Krupps non cemented ??
(........apologies for the nerdy reference to World War II warships, but I just couldn't resist it
).
I knew that was you before I even looked.
You and I are probably the only two people in the world sad enough to know what Krupps non cemented armour was.
Re: Puma
Posted:
Sun Nov 26, 2017 8:21 amby dazby
Where is LAHAD when you need him?
Re: Puma
Posted:
Sun Nov 26, 2017 1:30 pmby Dameerto
london blue 2 wrote:All in one?
We're playing in onesies next season?? That would be some outfit. I'd probably buy one as well.
Re: Puma
Posted:
Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:53 pmby Mikhail Chigorin
patrickblue wrote:Mikhail Chigorin wrote:ayrshireblue wrote:Absolutely hate Puma kits. Hate all Puma gear in fact. I was hoping we were going to go with Under Armour.
Would that then be Krupps cemented armour or Krupps non cemented ??
(........apologies for the nerdy reference to World War II warships, but I just couldn't resist it
).
I knew that was you before I even looked.
You and I are probably the only two people in the world sad enough to know what Krupps non cemented armour was.
You're a splendid fellow PB, of that there is no doubt
Re: Puma
Posted:
Tue Dec 26, 2017 9:26 amby Mase
Apparently our Nike contract doesn’t end until 18/19 season. So we’ve got another season of Nike FFS!
Re: Puma
Posted:
Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:41 amby Karenc
Mikhail Chigorin wrote:nottsblue wrote:BlueinBosnia wrote:nottsblue wrote:£50m a year. Tidy. And not a sniff of false sponsorship.
Whether we will catch the rags in terms of turnover is probably unlikely given their fan base worldwide, but we are hopefully narrowing the gap whilst putting more distance between us and the likes of Chelsea, Arsenal and Dippers.
FFP? Stick it up your fucking backside, it now means fuck all to us
Fan base doesn't mean anything in terms of turnover if your 'fans' don't spend money on club products. What proportion of Rag supporters have ever spent money on merchandise that the club receives any cash from, I wonder?
But in this digital age with clubs having Facebook accounts and the like, the more clicks/hits they get on these sites the more revenue will be generated. Fans in Africa or Asia might not buy much official merchandise but they will register and use digital technology
You're right NB; as the Tesco advert says/said "Every little helps".
Hi, Just wondering if maybe you would take part in my short survey about merchandise in the English Premier League, for my final year project I would be very grateful for your help
https://goo.gl/forms/XCfnkstjNg2iqGKl2
