The BEST FORUM in all the land and all the world
http://www.mancityfans.net/mcfnet/
http://www.mancityfans.net/mcfnet/viewtopic.php?f=119&t=53251
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:34 pmPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 12:54 pmPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 1:01 pmOriginal Dub wrote:Well they will surely have lukaku suspended for Watford, arsenal and us so there's a really good chance that we can go 15 ahead if we beat them.
I can't see them getting any more than a point or two out of these two games coming up.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 1:02 pmfreshie wrote:Original Dub wrote:Well they will surely have lukaku suspended for Watford, arsenal and us so there's a really good chance that we can go 15 ahead if we beat them.
I can't see them getting any more than a point or two out of these two games coming up.
Don't bet on him getting a red. This is the rags after all
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 1:04 pmPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 2:02 pmPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 2:06 pmManchester United striker Romelu Lukaku will face no further action for his clash with Brighton's Gaetan Bong on Saturday, Sky Sports News understands.
Lukaku appeared to kick out at Bong on two occasions just before Ashley Young's shot deflected off Lewis Dunk for what proved to be the winning goal in United's 1-0 win at Old Trafford.
The Belgium international was left sweating on possible retrospective action as the incident was missed by referee Neil Swarbrick and his team of assistants.
That meant it was referred to a three-man panel of former officials, which has to find a unanimous decision if a player is to be charged.
However, Sky Sports News understands that the panel could not agree that an offence was committed and Lukaku therefore avoids what could have been a three-game ban for violent conduct.
The December 10 derby clash with Manchester City was among the games Lukaku could have missed had he been sanctioned.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 2:14 pmaaron bond wrote:http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/11146659/manchester-uniteds-romelu-lukaku-facing-no-disciplinary-action-for-gaetan-bong-clashManchester United striker Romelu Lukaku will face no further action for his clash with Brighton's Gaetan Bong on Saturday, Sky Sports News understands.
Lukaku appeared to kick out at Bong on two occasions just before Ashley Young's shot deflected off Lewis Dunk for what proved to be the winning goal in United's 1-0 win at Old Trafford.
The Belgium international was left sweating on possible retrospective action as the incident was missed by referee Neil Swarbrick and his team of assistants.
That meant it was referred to a three-man panel of former officials, which has to find a unanimous decision if a player is to be charged.
However, Sky Sports News understands that the panel could not agree that an offence was committed and Lukaku therefore avoids what could have been a three-game ban for violent conduct.
The December 10 derby clash with Manchester City was among the games Lukaku could have missed had he been sanctioned.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 2:16 pmOriginal Dub wrote:freshie wrote:Original Dub wrote:Well they will surely have lukaku suspended for Watford, arsenal and us so there's a really good chance that we can go 15 ahead if we beat them.
I can't see them getting any more than a point or two out of these two games coming up.
Don't bet on him getting a red. This is the rags after all
If he doesn't, I'll blow a fucking fuse - how much evidence do they need?!
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 2:36 pmWonderwall wrote:aaron bond wrote:http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/11146659/manchester-uniteds-romelu-lukaku-facing-no-disciplinary-action-for-gaetan-bong-clashManchester United striker Romelu Lukaku will face no further action for his clash with Brighton's Gaetan Bong on Saturday, Sky Sports News understands.
Lukaku appeared to kick out at Bong on two occasions just before Ashley Young's shot deflected off Lewis Dunk for what proved to be the winning goal in United's 1-0 win at Old Trafford.
The Belgium international was left sweating on possible retrospective action as the incident was missed by referee Neil Swarbrick and his team of assistants.
That meant it was referred to a three-man panel of former officials, which has to find a unanimous decision if a player is to be charged.
However, Sky Sports News understands that the panel could not agree that an offence was committed and Lukaku therefore avoids what could have been a three-game ban for violent conduct.
The December 10 derby clash with Manchester City was among the games Lukaku could have missed had he been sanctioned.
This panel should have their findings published with a script of how they came to their conclusion. This is as blatant as it gets. The only thing that saved him is the opposition player not making a meal of it.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 2:38 pmPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 5:38 pm
.Huddersfield were 20-1 for the win yesterday.If you had put £100.00 on them,and cashed out as soon as they scored you were going to win a few quid.If you back first goal scorer in games the odds are pretty shit compared.You are better backing a win and cashing out,if you can Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 6:16 pmWonderwall wrote:aaron bond wrote:http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/11146659/manchester-uniteds-romelu-lukaku-facing-no-disciplinary-action-for-gaetan-bong-clashManchester United striker Romelu Lukaku will face no further action for his clash with Brighton's Gaetan Bong on Saturday, Sky Sports News understands.
Lukaku appeared to kick out at Bong on two occasions just before Ashley Young's shot deflected off Lewis Dunk for what proved to be the winning goal in United's 1-0 win at Old Trafford.
The Belgium international was left sweating on possible retrospective action as the incident was missed by referee Neil Swarbrick and his team of assistants.
That meant it was referred to a three-man panel of former officials, which has to find a unanimous decision if a player is to be charged.
However, Sky Sports News understands that the panel could not agree that an offence was committed and Lukaku therefore avoids what could have been a three-game ban for violent conduct.
The December 10 derby clash with Manchester City was among the games Lukaku could have missed had he been sanctioned.
This panel should have their findings published with a script of how they came to their conclusion. This is as blatant as it gets. The only thing that saved him is the opposition player not making a meal of it.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 6:19 pmzabbadabbado wrote:I have a got a vibe about Watford.if the odds are decent, i might put a few quid on them for a win, but cash out as soon as they go 1-0 up
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 6:34 pmOriginal Dub wrote:Wonderwall wrote:aaron bond wrote:http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/11146659/manchester-uniteds-romelu-lukaku-facing-no-disciplinary-action-for-gaetan-bong-clashManchester United striker Romelu Lukaku will face no further action for his clash with Brighton's Gaetan Bong on Saturday, Sky Sports News understands.
Lukaku appeared to kick out at Bong on two occasions just before Ashley Young's shot deflected off Lewis Dunk for what proved to be the winning goal in United's 1-0 win at Old Trafford.
The Belgium international was left sweating on possible retrospective action as the incident was missed by referee Neil Swarbrick and his team of assistants.
That meant it was referred to a three-man panel of former officials, which has to find a unanimous decision if a player is to be charged.
However, Sky Sports News understands that the panel could not agree that an offence was committed and Lukaku therefore avoids what could have been a three-game ban for violent conduct.
The December 10 derby clash with Manchester City was among the games Lukaku could have missed had he been sanctioned.
This panel should have their findings published with a script of how they came to their conclusion. This is as blatant as it gets. The only thing that saved him is the opposition player not making a meal of it.
Exactly.
I'd love to see the cunt explain on camera how he watched that video evidence and saw nothing.
The only reason in this case is bias. Nobody is that incompetent.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 6:43 pmnottsblue wrote:Original Dub wrote:Wonderwall wrote:aaron bond wrote:http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/11146659/manchester-uniteds-romelu-lukaku-facing-no-disciplinary-action-for-gaetan-bong-clashManchester United striker Romelu Lukaku will face no further action for his clash with Brighton's Gaetan Bong on Saturday, Sky Sports News understands.
Lukaku appeared to kick out at Bong on two occasions just before Ashley Young's shot deflected off Lewis Dunk for what proved to be the winning goal in United's 1-0 win at Old Trafford.
The Belgium international was left sweating on possible retrospective action as the incident was missed by referee Neil Swarbrick and his team of assistants.
That meant it was referred to a three-man panel of former officials, which has to find a unanimous decision if a player is to be charged.
However, Sky Sports News understands that the panel could not agree that an offence was committed and Lukaku therefore avoids what could have been a three-game ban for violent conduct.
The December 10 derby clash with Manchester City was among the games Lukaku could have missed had he been sanctioned.
This panel should have their findings published with a script of how they came to their conclusion. This is as blatant as it gets. The only thing that saved him is the opposition player not making a meal of it.
Exactly.
I'd love to see the cunt explain on camera how he watched that video evidence and saw nothing.
The only reason in this case is bias. Nobody is that incompetent.
Be nice to know who the panel are and what each individuals findings were
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 9:21 pmPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:06 pmPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 8:07 amPrezIke wrote:on ESPNFC Shaka Hislop says there is no other explanation for this other than that this is because he plays for Utd.
Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 9:16 amBeefymcfc wrote:PrezIke wrote:on ESPNFC Shaka Hislop says there is no other explanation for this other than that this is because he plays for Utd.
I like Shaka, seen him sticking up for us a few times, and very anti-Rag and some eyes as he says it as he sees it.
