Pretty Boy Lee wrote: carl_feedthegoat wrote: Pretty Boy Lee wrote: Nigels Tackle wrote:
Man City manager Pep Guardiola, speaking to BBC Sport: "It was a great victory in special conditions, against one of the most physical teams in Europe. We had many chances. We have to score and we didn't. That is why hopefully we will improve in the future.
dazby wrote:Tottenham have a finishing problem Nigel. As do every other team we've played this season.
Oh, except Lyon, which is the exception that makes you right.
i'm glad that we have pep as our manager and not you or pbl who clearly are happy to settle for 'average' rather than 'excellence'.
Oh and since you’re so good at finding quotes to back up your loooooooooong winded moaning quickly go fetch me one that says I’m happy to settle for average. When you don’t find one come back and admit you’re a miserable cunt who adds nothing to the board.
To be fair - You did call PeP a TiT for whinging about missed chances.
You slate him for starting nearly every player we’ve had tho, it’s fun. My argument has been all along that our missing of chances hasn’t consistently hurt us as we create so many. Also we don’t allow many because we’re always up the other end attacking. My argument has never been that we don’t miss. It’s that we still create and score more than the rest while letting less in.
As Jay-Z once said “men lie, women lie, numbers don’t”
Which, if anyone could be arsed to go back to the long running feud between OD (remember him) and Nidge was the point Nidge would repeatedly make.
That it was going to cost us when we play better teams.
Well it hasn’t so far. And it’s not because we’ scoring as much as we should.
It’s because we don’t make ad many fnck ups at our end. We’ve shored up at the back.
We have been missing a lot of chances but we did last year also. If it’s worse, then only marginally but others are struggling a lot more than us.
Overall I see us as a stronger unit and the goals will come when Kev gets up to speed.
See we can all be right.
Good to get along isn’t it.