johnny crossan wrote:patrickblue wrote:Beefymcfc wrote:johnny crossan wrote:patrickblue wrote:Your man in the other thread was spot on when he says City should have taken Uefa to court back in 2014.
Who knows? We could have lost.
I don't think we would but UEFA wouldn't be worried about that,it would've been the fact that the cartel had used a once decent method to look after clubs and turned it into a blunt instrument to stop investment by clubs they wanted to stop.
UEFA were forced into a situation that they didn't want in the first place, the settlement was a way of ensuring that they weren't put into a position where they would've lost all credibility going forward. Plus, we would've forced them to show evidence of the pressure exerted,. Now, that'd have been interesting, moreso than the recent leaks.
My thoughts precisely.
Nonsense. You think things would be better now if we'd lost in court?
If UEFA had won we wouldn't have the manager and the team we have now. We wouldn't be complaining about media attacks - they wouldn't be any - we'd win nothing.
I'm certain in my own mind we would not have lost.
And we would have made the statement that we believed the whole thing was a sham, designed to protect the existing elite and not allow anyone else in.
By accepting UEFA's deal we validated FFP to a degree. It was a compromise, and at the time seemed a reasonable one, but with the benefit of hindsight, I'd lay odds that the club now wish they had taken the legal route.
We would have been taking the moral high ground, but as it now is we will keep on being accused of dodgy dealing, simply because we did a deal with a suspect organisation over a very dubious set of rules.
It's my belief this will all end up in litigation anyway, I believe we should have made our point at the outset and stuck to it