The mancityfans.net football forum

I’m confused, why did the ref blow at 90 mins, 6 subs, a couple of stoppages, albeit short ones. I’ve never seen this before in my life......where was VAR when it was needed?

Sparklehorse wrote:I’m confused, why did the ref blow at 90 mins, 6 subs, a couple of stoppages, albeit short ones. I’ve never seen this before in my life......where was VAR when it was needed?

Out of mercy for Rotherham.

Hutch's Shoulder wrote:

Sparklehorse wrote:I’m confused, why did the ref blow at 90 mins, 6 subs, a couple of stoppages, albeit short ones. I’ve never seen this before in my life......where was VAR when it was needed?

Out of mercy for Rotherham.

The only reason.

The ref had a few quid on 7-0 more like it.

sheblue wrote:The ref had a few quid on 7-0 more like it.

if it’s gamblers that are moaning, fuck em.
what was the point in playing beyond the 90 min mark?

Nigels Tackle wrote:

sheblue wrote:The ref had a few quid on 7-0 more like it.

if it’s gamblers that are moaning, fuck em.
what was the point in playing beyond the 90 min mark?

The ref wanted to get off early and beat the traffic

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:

exactly

Because the ref was playing by infant school football rules, feeling sorry for the team losing 36-0.

No excuse, poor, but who cares?

john@staustell wrote:Because the ref was playing by infant school football rules, feeling sorry for the team losing 36-0.

No excuse, poor, but who cares?

I would care if we were 1-0 down

I found it strange also but with no goal difference rule it made no difference and was fine by me.