The mancityfans.net football forum

Nine(9)

Clough was 30 when we signed him and then went on to play 10 more years.

Nine!!!!!

Mahrez is becoming prolific too.
Great player.

bigblue wrote:This is probably be the easiest game Eric Garcia has ever and will ever play in his life

Reckon I could have played in goal

Mase wrote:
We're not talking about speed of a player. I think you've misunderstood. Speed and desire are two different things.

No, we are not, I was just pointing out what will lose Dave as years will pass by. His skills and passing will remain the same, like it did with Iniesta, Xavi, Pirlo, etc.

I did not see Clough play for us, just highlights, I am just curious if it was really necesary for us to buy him when we did.
I just checked, we got him in 96, so he was 30 at that time.

PeterParker wrote:

Mase wrote:
We're not talking about speed of a player. I think you've misunderstood. Speed and desire are two different things.

No, we are not, I was just pointing out what will lose Dave as years will pass by. His skills and passing will remain the same, like it did with Iniesta, Xavi, Pirlo, etc.

I did not see Clough play for us, just highlights, I am just curious if it was really necesary for us to buy him when we did.
I just checked, we got him in 96, so he was 30 at that time.

Haha just end the convo now then mate. At least five people have told you the same thing.

And also Dave's never had speed.

OK, here's the headline if we get one more. Picture of Merlin with the headline "The Captain and Ten-Nil"

PeterParker wrote:

Mase wrote:
We're not talking about speed of a player. I think you've misunderstood. Speed and desire are two different things.

No, we are not, I was just pointing out what will lose Dave as years will pass by. His skills and passing will remain the same, like it did with Iniesta, Xavi, Pirlo, etc.

I did not see Clough play for us, just highlights, I am just curious if it was really necesary for us to buy him when we did.
I just checked, we got him in 96, so he was 30 at that time.

There were no highlights

He was all we could get. Then we found out why

Bet we don't get much injury time either

john@staustell wrote:

PeterParker wrote:

Mase wrote:
We're not talking about speed of a player. I think you've misunderstood. Speed and desire are two different things.

No, we are not, I was just pointing out what will lose Dave as years will pass by. His skills and passing will remain the same, like it did with Iniesta, Xavi, Pirlo, etc.

I did not see Clough play for us, just highlights, I am just curious if it was really necesary for us to buy him when we did.
I just checked, we got him in 96, so he was 30 at that time.

There were no highlights

He was all we could get. Then we found out why

Wasn't it around the same time we were offered Figo for about £2 million and said no?

Mase wrote:

PeterParker wrote:

Mase wrote:
We're not talking about speed of a player. I think you've misunderstood. Speed and desire are two different things.

No, we are not, I was just pointing out what will lose Dave as years will pass by. His skills and passing will remain the same, like it did with Iniesta, Xavi, Pirlo, etc.

I did not see Clough play for us, just highlights, I am just curious if it was really necesary for us to buy him when we did.
I just checked, we got him in 96, so he was 30 at that time.

Haha just end the convo now then mate. At least five people have told you the same thing.

And also Dave's never had speed.

I think you misuderstood me, Mase. I have genuine no opinion about him, that is why I asked, how people see him and if he was any good for us. Got my answer, but I was curious, why did we go for him, because I was convinced we got him at 33 and not 30.

What a fucking game!

Booo. Only 9.

PeterParker wrote:

Mase wrote:

PeterParker wrote:

Mase wrote:
We're not talking about speed of a player. I think you've misunderstood. Speed and desire are two different things.

No, we are not, I was just pointing out what will lose Dave as years will pass by. His skills and passing will remain the same, like it did with Iniesta, Xavi, Pirlo, etc.

I did not see Clough play for us, just highlights, I am just curious if it was really necesary for us to buy him when we did.
I just checked, we got him in 96, so he was 30 at that time.

Haha just end the convo now then mate. At least five people have told you the same thing.

And also Dave's never had speed.

I think you misuderstood me, Mase. I have genuine no opinion about him, that is why I asked, how people see him and if he was any good for us. Got my answer, but I was curious, why did we go for him, because I was convinced we got him at 33 and not 30.

Fair enough mate.

At 1-0 I thought we looked a bit shaky.

I hope the EDS play in the second leg.

That will do.

PeterParker wrote:I hope the EDS play in the second leg.

The under 16s could play and not lose 9-0

We won't be disrespectful in the next game but it will allow us the opportunity to pick and choose when it counts.

Well done Pep, well done Man City!!!