Page 5 of 13

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:17 pm
by CTID Hants
That's better Gabriel, pls pls pls kick on from here

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:18 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
Cost of the squad mentioned again.

hahahahah

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:18 pm
by Sideshow Bob
sane is just taking the p*ss

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:19 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
And again !!!! mentioned it again.

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:19 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
And again hahhahahahha the fuckign cunt..3 times in a minute and a half.

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:20 pm
by Beefymcfc
nottsblue wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:
nottsblue wrote:
Beefymcfc wrote:Fuck me, we've even got pictorial stats of the cost difference. The first time I've ever seen that!

Just beat me to post that Beefy.

I'm not sure if I'm wrong but that has to be the first time any televised media has done that. How fucking distorted do you have to be to actually go through with shit like that?

So glad I fucked one of !y accounts off recently, and told them the reason why; their content is biased and shit!

No doubt at the end of the game they’ll have some stat as too how much each goal cost us or some other such made up shite

We're there to be ridiculed, otherwise the Rag cunts wouldn't buy their product.

Surely there'll be some Rag comparison soon, even if they aren't in the cup.

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:20 pm
by CTID Hants
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Cost of the squad mentioned again.

hahahahah


ESPN? Oh and again wankers

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:20 pm
by Mase
Sky compared the wages. Sad cunts

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:20 pm
by nottsblue
CTID Hants wrote:That's better Gabriel, pls pls pls kick on from here

That’ll do

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:20 pm
by Tokyo Blue
carl_feedthegoat wrote:And again !!!! mentioned it again.

It would be relevant if Burton were allowed to spend what City spend.

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:20 pm
by Sideshow Bob
get in but wow he almost missed that

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:20 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
Mase wrote:Sky compared the wages. Sad cunts


About 5 times.

JG tried to miss from 1 inch,.

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:21 pm
by CTID Hants
JESUS!! let's have a hat trick by half time now

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:21 pm
by bigblue
Gundo opens them up again. Then a nice, calm finish from Gab

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:21 pm
by PeterParker
We are furious.

Love it

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:23 pm
by sheblue
Nige looks like he needs the pub.

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:23 pm
by Sideshow Bob
lolwtft???

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:23 pm
by nottsblue
What a goal from Zinc. I reckon he meant that

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:24 pm
by nottsblue
sheblue wrote:Nige looks like he needs the pub.

Looks like he drank half of it like his old man

Re: ***CITY v Burton LC Semi Final Official match thread***

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:24 pm
by Mase
Score is it?