Re: meh!rez
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 3:45 pmOtter is good at long passes.
The mancityfans.net football forum
The BEST FORUM in all the land and all the world
http://www.mancityfans.net/mcfnet/
meh!rez - what does he even do?
http://www.mancityfans.net/mcfnet/viewtopic.php?f=119&t=54526
Page 11 of 14
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 3:45 pmRe: meh!rez
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:24 pmFUCK IT.............Zinchenko is no fuckign better than the fuckign tea lady at long passes....in fact hes fuckign shite...cunt should have been forced out on loan.
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:50 pmcarl_feedthegoat wrote:FUCK IT.............Zinchenko is no fuckign better than the fuckign tea lady at long passes....in fact hes fuckign shite...cunt should have been forced out on loan.
is she better than meh!rez though?
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 10:49 pmNigels Tackle wrote:carl_feedthegoat wrote:FUCK IT.............Zinchenko is no fuckign better than the fuckign tea lady at long passes....in fact hes fuckign shite...cunt should have been forced out on loan.
is she better than meh!rez though?
Possibly...
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 10:52 pmOutcast wrote:I've lost my patience with him on Saturday. Everytime he gets the ball he dithers with it one/ two touches followed by a wasteful cross. We could've been 2 nil up had he produced a better final pass/cross. It's down to him to assert himself if he wants to be a regural starter. I think he lacks self belief and maybe tries too hard rather than working too hard for the team?. However he made the choice to move here, he should back himself to break into first team starting with our team ethos. I dont see him busting his guts for the team, I remember when signed Bernardo, he worked tirelessly and especially when he came off the bench for the team, he showed unbelievable desire. He's obviously getting his reward for his tenacity and hard work. Is Mahrez trying to catch the eye? Is he trying to be fancy? Is he trying too hard to impress the manager and fans? Is he trying to justify his price tag? He should know Aguero was dropped when he initially didn't buy into our team ethos and look at him now. There is no quick fix to this, back to basics Mahrez, put the team first, work your socks off, things might come good
That’s pretty much it. IMO.
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:58 amLet me get you lot straight. You are arguing that because we paid a record fee for him, that he should be better than players that we have previously suggested could go on to win best player in the world status?
None of you suggested this when we signed him. No one.
We bought another cog in the machine. His history meant we needed to pay top dollar to get him.
None of you suggested this when we signed him. No one.
We bought another cog in the machine. His history meant we needed to pay top dollar to get him.
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 6:06 amdazby wrote:Let me get you lot straight. You are arguing that because we paid a record fee for him, that he should be better than players that we havepreviously suggested could go on to win best player in the world status?
None of you suggested this when we signed him. No one.
We bought another cog in the machine. His history meant we needed to pay top dollar to get him.
What I said was he should be able to at least compete with the currently recognised starters in the team, hopefully in multiple positions.
If Foxes were demanding our record transfer fee for him, then maybe we should have scrutinised his performances and capabilities to a very high degree,
and possibly walked away from it. We should NOT be paying our record transfer fee for a cog in the machine.
Look across the road at Pog ; until Mourinho pulled stumps a couple of months back, most United fans would have happily paid for his plane fare back to Juve, and driven him to the airport.
And bought him a six-pack of XXXX Gold to drink on the plane.(Though he might not have been allowed to board with dangerous substances).
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 6:46 amdazby wrote:Let me get you lot straight. You are arguing that because we paid a record fee for him, that he should be better than players that we have previously suggested could go on to win best player in the world status?
None of you suggested this when we signed him. No one.
We bought another cog in the machine. His history meant we needed to pay top dollar to get him.
Daz, he's a former POTY ffs. Even if we paid 50p for him I'd expect a certain level of performance.
Hopefully he comes good next year.
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:06 amMase wrote:dazby wrote:Let me get you lot straight. You are arguing that because we paid a record fee for him, that he should be better than players that we have previously suggested could go on to win best player in the world status?
None of you suggested this when we signed him. No one.
We bought another cog in the machine. His history meant we needed to pay top dollar to get him.
Daz, he's a former POTY ffs. Even if we paid 50p for him I'd expect a certain level of performance.
Hopefully he comes good next year.
We are getting a certain level of performance, he's in double figures for both goals and assists across all comps. A goal involvement evey 100 minutes on the pitch.
He is frustrating, he's not doing enough and he does deserve questioning/criticism but he's not shit, hopefully he can buy into the team ethos because when he's at it he can be very good, technically brilliant and gives us a different option out wide.
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:25 amIN ALL COMPS FIBD! Fuck me they've been against Championship teams.
If you think his performances have been good against Premier League teams you're crazy.
If you think his performances have been good against Premier League teams you're crazy.
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:35 am14 goal involvements in 1450 minutes in league and Champions league Mase, including the decisive goal in the games against Watford away, Spurs away and Bournemouth away.
Like I was saying he's currently not doing enough but we are getting a certain level of performance out of him regardless.
Like I was saying he's currently not doing enough but we are getting a certain level of performance out of him regardless.
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:48 amDoes this Radar miss Delph,
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:56 amHazy2 wrote:Does this Radar miss Delph,
delph didn’t cost us £60m and was only ever signed to boost the home grown quota. he also plays out of position 95% of the time.
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 9:43 amNigels Tackle wrote:Hazy2 wrote:Does this Radar miss Delph,
delph didn’t cost us £60m and was only ever signed to boost the home grown quota. he also plays out of position 95% of the time.
I see more to worry about when Delph is in the side than any other player in our entire squad. I think Fabian is a great lad but the term He has a fook up in him is taylor made for him.
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 10:12 amForeverinbluedreams wrote:14 goal involvements in 1450 minutes in league and Champions league Mase, including the decisive goal in the games against Watford away, Spurs away and Bournemouth away.
Like I was saying he's currently not doing enough but we are getting a certain level of performance out of him regardless.
You keep quoting his stats when we're talking about performance mate.
No one is saying his stats aren't alright, but his performance for a former POTY are crap.
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 10:17 amMase wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:14 goal involvements in 1450 minutes in league and Champions league Mase, including the decisive goal in the games against Watford away, Spurs away and Bournemouth away.
Like I was saying he's currently not doing enough but we are getting a certain level of performance out of him regardless.
You keep quoting his stats when we're talking about performance mate.
No one is saying his stats aren't alright, but his performance for a former POTY are crap.
I've acknowledged his performances overall aren't good enough, the reason I posted his stats is because you said we should be getting a certain level of performance, we are, his stats show that.
The price tag and the former poty thing are irrelevant to me.
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 10:42 amForeverinbluedreams wrote:Mase wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:14 goal involvements in 1450 minutes in league and Champions league Mase, including the decisive goal in the games against Watford away, Spurs away and Bournemouth away.
Like I was saying he's currently not doing enough but we are getting a certain level of performance out of him regardless.
You keep quoting his stats when we're talking about performance mate.
No one is saying his stats aren't alright, but his performance for a former POTY are crap.
I've acknowledged his performances overall aren't good enough, the reason I posted his stats is because you said we should be getting a certain level of performance, we are, his stats show that.
The price tag and the former poty thing are irrelevant to me.
How can his price tag and being former POTY be irrelevant??!
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 10:48 amForeverinbluedreams wrote:Mase wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:14 goal involvements in 1450 minutes in league and Champions league Mase, including the decisive goal in the games against Watford away, Spurs away and Bournemouth away.
Like I was saying he's currently not doing enough but we are getting a certain level of performance out of him regardless.
You keep quoting his stats when we're talking about performance mate.
No one is saying his stats aren't alright, but his performance for a former POTY are crap.
I've acknowledged his performances overall aren't good enough, the reason I posted his stats is because you said we should be getting a certain level of performance, we are, his stats show that.
The price tag and the former poty thing are irrelevant to me.
do you understand the concept of opportunity cost?
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 10:52 amMase wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Mase wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:14 goal involvements in 1450 minutes in league and Champions league Mase, including the decisive goal in the games against Watford away, Spurs away and Bournemouth away.
Like I was saying he's currently not doing enough but we are getting a certain level of performance out of him regardless.
You keep quoting his stats when we're talking about performance mate.
No one is saying his stats aren't alright, but his performance for a former POTY are crap.
I've acknowledged his performances overall aren't good enough, the reason I posted his stats is because you said we should be getting a certain level of performance, we are, his stats show that.
The price tag and the former poty thing are irrelevant to me.
How can his price tag and being former POTY be irrelevant??!
All I care about are his performances in a City shirt, anything outside that is just noise.
Re: meh!rez
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 10:54 amNigels Tackle wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:Mase wrote:Foreverinbluedreams wrote:14 goal involvements in 1450 minutes in league and Champions league Mase, including the decisive goal in the games against Watford away, Spurs away and Bournemouth away.
Like I was saying he's currently not doing enough but we are getting a certain level of performance out of him regardless.
You keep quoting his stats when we're talking about performance mate.
No one is saying his stats aren't alright, but his performance for a former POTY are crap.
I've acknowledged his performances overall aren't good enough, the reason I posted his stats is because you said we should be getting a certain level of performance, we are, his stats show that.
The price tag and the former poty thing are irrelevant to me.
do you understand the concept of opportunity cost?
Yep and I accept the monies could have been better spent elsewhere but I'm not going to give the player a hard time over it as it's beyond his control.