The mancityfans.net football forum

Posted: **Tue Aug 20, 2019 10:28 pm**

This is just laughable, what qualifies that twat to be head of VAR?

Posted: **Tue Aug 20, 2019 11:21 pm**

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:This is just laughable, what qualifies that twat to be head of VAR?

Its been said on here over and over - they will simply ''justify'' any decision they WANT to make from now on....the power has now gone to some fuckign no mark in a little hut with his 50 fuckign frames a second to choose from.

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 2:18 am**

Plain Speaking wrote:I saw this comment on the BBC
"I think the rule has been incorrectly applied. The goal has to be "scored or created with the use of the hand or arm". The brushing of the arm did not create the goal, so no offence. "
Regardless all those saying it was the "right decision" I am sure that sort of incident was not in mind when the new rule was drafted.

Personally I think the new rule needs clarification to get to the original purpose:
If the actual goalscorer used his hand or arm to score a goal, then no problem - the goal should be disallowed. However, If it contacted a separate player earlier in the attack and this wouldn't be a free kick outside the area the goal should stand.

This is what I feel the rule should be. Jesus had plenty of work to do before scoring. It wasn't like it deflected to him for a tap in. It's utterly ridiculous.

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 2:21 am**

Plain Speaking wrote:I saw this comment on the BBC
"I think the rule has been incorrectly applied. The goal has to be "scored or created with the use of the hand or arm". The brushing of the arm did not create the goal, so no offence. "
Regardless all those saying it was the "right decision" I am sure that sort of incident was not in mind when the new rule was drafted.

Personally I think the new rule needs clarification to get to the original purpose:
If the actual goalscorer used his hand or arm to score a goal, then no problem - the goal should be disallowed. However, If it contacted a separate player earlier in the attack and this wouldn't be a free kick outside the area the goal should stand.

This is what I feel the rule should be. Jesus had plenty of work to do before scoring. It wasn't like it deflected to him for a tap in. It's utterly ridiculous, as is the difference with how little it takes for VAR to impact a handball in the box, or for it to be reviewed, but for a pen to be given, the standard is the complete opposite and the ref can say no without VAR intervening (which makes no sense to me at all and is going to be a long term problem for consistency)

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 6:51 am**

VAR will also cause issues outside the ground as well. How many City fans were furious after that decision so late in the game? You've got Spurs fans jumping up and down celebrating the no goal.

A female Spurs fan claims she was whacked by a City fan after the match.

Imagine the trouble in a derby or against the murderers if that happened where one team scored a perfectly good goal and it was disallowed last min.

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 6:52 am**

VAR will also cause issues outside the ground as well. How many City fans were furious after that decision so late in the game? You've got Spurs fans jumping up and down celebrating the no goal.

A female Spurs fan claims she was whacked by a City fan after the match.

Imagine the trouble in a derby or against the murderers if that happened where one team scored a perfectly good goal and it was disallowed last min.

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 9:08 am**

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:This is just laughable, what qualifies that twat to be head of VAR?

"That's how the ref saw the incident" THE REF WAS LOOKING THE OTHER WAY :lol:

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 9:16 am**

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:This is just laughable, what qualifies that twat to be head of VAR?

"That's how the ref saw the incident" THE REF WAS LOOKING THE OTHER WAY :lol:

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 9:34 am**

Foreverinbluedreams wrote:This is just laughable, what qualifies that twat to be head of VAR?

"That's how the ref saw the incident" THE REF WAS LOOKING THE OTHER WAY :lol:

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 9:37 am**

The fuck is wrong with the forum?

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 9:58 am**

The fuck is wrong with the forum?

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:04 am**

Fuck knows

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:04 am**

Fuck knows

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:23 am**

Mase wrote:
Foreverinbluedreams wrote:This is just laughable, what qualifies that twat to be head of VAR?

"That's how the ref saw the incident" THE REF WAS LOOKING THE OTHER WAY

Which also begs the question, what the fuck was he looking at and why?

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 11:59 am**

If it was I'd be looking at Otamendi. But maybe that's just me?

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 1:38 pm**

Will you cunts stop repeating yourselves.

Mase you have a fair point, I'm a man of peace but after the VARCE on Saturday I couldn't have twatted some fucker.

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 1:38 pm**

Will you cunts stop repeating yourselves.

Mase you have a fair point, I'm a man of peace but after the VARCE on Saturday I couldn't have twatted some fucker.

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 3:17 pm**

Pmsl

Can someone fix this fucking site !!!!!

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 6:40 pm**

carl_feedthegoat wrote:Pmsl

Can someone fix this fucking site !!!!!

Come again ?

Posted: **Wed Aug 21, 2019 8:26 pm**

carl_feedthegoat wrote:Pmsl

Can someone fix this fucking site !!!!!

I could ask Gillie.

The mancityfans.net football forum

VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR

Re: VAR