Page 1 of 1
better without mikel?

Posted:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 6:14 pm
by Nigels Tackle
discuss...
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 6:24 pm
by Bluemoon4610
Nigels Tackle wrote:discuss...
What's to discuss?
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 6:29 pm
by trueblue64
Nigels Tackle wrote:discuss...
I was about to post the same, I think we are playing better football since he has departed.
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 6:57 pm
by Saul Goodman
I think fans have zero chance of being able to discern the difference of the impact of any assistant coach at any club. The only caveat would be, for example, if Arteta was in charge of set pieces and then all of a sudden we started banging in set piece goals after he left--something like that.
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 7:00 pm
by nottsblue
Far too early to say. Only the manager and maybe some of the senior players would be able to answer the question anyway
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:25 pm
by City64
Arsenal are still shit , discussion over !
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 8:54 pm
by Bluemoon4610
City64 wrote:Arsenal are still shit , discussion over !
+1
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 9:05 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
Too early to tell but maybe now some players are playing with less strict instructions and are playing more freely , able to express themselves more ?
The last 2 games we have played some unreal football — maybe the above is the reason why ?
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 9:10 pm
by Bluemoon4610
trueblue64 wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:discuss...
I was about to post the same, I think we are playing better football since he has departed.
But still not as good as some of the football as when he was here. What does that tell you?
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 9:56 pm
by Bluemoon4610
carl_feedthegoat wrote:Too early to tell but maybe now some players are playing with less strict instructions and are playing more freely , able to express themselves more ?
The last 2 games we have played some unreal football — maybe the above is the reason why ?
The last 2 seasons we have played some unreal football — maybe the above is the reason why ?
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Sun Jan 12, 2020 10:26 pm
by sheblue
No nothing to do with it. We were going to improve regardless.
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:17 am
by BlueinBosnia
Saul Goodman wrote:I think fans have zero chance of being able to discern the difference of the impact of any assistant coach at any club. The only caveat would be, for example, if Arteta was in charge of set pieces and then all of a sudden we started banging in set piece goals after he left--something like that.
Agreed. However, there's the other argument that too much of training was allocated to Arteta 'learning the ropes', and the squad faffing about because of it. I'd be amazed if this had actually happened, though, and, if it did, it would be a real cause for concern regarding Pep's management.
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:15 pm
by john@staustell
Just getting into our stride
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:47 pm
by Sideshow Bob
imo arteta had basically zero influence on our results, good or bad. lacks charisma, always expressionless. cant see him being the one to cure the malaise at arsenal.
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Mon Jan 13, 2020 6:39 pm
by Mase
Sideshow Bob wrote:imo arteta had basically zero influence on our results, good or bad. lacks charisma, always expressionless. cant see him being the one to cure the malaise at arsenal.
He seems like one boring twat.
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Mon Jan 13, 2020 7:52 pm
by littlebig
sheblue wrote:No nothing to do with it. We were going to improve regardless.
Agree
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Mon Jan 13, 2020 11:04 pm
by City64
Looks like Arteta has made a bid tonight to sign John Stones on loan , both Arteta and Stones share the same agent apparently .
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Mon Jan 13, 2020 11:11 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
City64 wrote:Looks like Arteta has made a bid tonight to sign John Stones on loan , both Arteta and Stones share the same agent apparently .
We shouldn't loan anyone out that's not a youngster that's playing in the reserves - Id sell him outright.
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Mon Jan 13, 2020 11:40 pm
by nottsblue
carl_feedthegoat wrote:City64 wrote:Looks like Arteta has made a bid tonight to sign John Stones on loan , both Arteta and Stones share the same agent apparently .
We shouldn't loan anyone out that's not a youngster that's playing in the reserves - Id sell him outright.
We wouldn’t be that lucky
Re: better without mikel?

Posted:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 7:57 am
by salford city
Loan him with clauses to pick up his wages and also buy in the summer