The mancityfans.net football forum

Simister wrote:

City64 wrote:

Mase wrote:United lose to City once again and suddenly the "but but you were making aeroplane gestures" excuse comes out.

The amount of times as a kid I used to ask my mum when we played those red bastards, "why are their fans doing aeroplanes?" - if they're going to do them constantly throughout the match then they've got to expect some back.

What a great way to deflect from the fact their fans were ripping up seats and launching them.

Loads of fighting, flares thrown into the city section and free for all’s outside the ground if you got caught up in it but the world wide tv armchair audience was safe and sound listening to an utter white wash of an agenda by the sounds of things ..........

BBC radio now summarising that City fans made aeroplane gestures, United fans threw a couple of seats which were then thrown backwards and forwards. No mention of flares of course. Sports editor obviously a rag.

carl_feedthegoat wrote:No Beefy...you said where did we get beat.....we lost the fuckign match...at home...again.

Unacceptable.

carl_feedthegoat wrote:

Harry Dowd scored wrote:I fucking hate losing to the scum, after all the years of shit we took, when we have a better team I do not expect to lose three out of four home games.
I called this out before the game, defence disjointed, why Cancelo at left back, Garcia has looked good lately, why not play him? Doesn’t seem to work with Rodri and Gundogan. I know we are through, but it doesn’t feel that way.

Bluemoon4610 wrote:

carl_feedthegoat wrote:No Beefy...you said where did we get beat.....we lost the fuckign match...at home...again.

Unacceptable.

"The match" was played over 2 legs. We won one leg 3-1, lost one leg 0-1 so we won "the match" 3-2. So we're going to Wembley. Again. Pissed off to lose to such a wank rag team, but over all we did enough. Just! Just saying......

Mase wrote:

Bluemoon4610 wrote:

carl_feedthegoat wrote:No Beefy...you said where did we get beat.....we lost the fuckign match...at home...again.

Unacceptable.

"The match" was played over 2 legs. We won one leg 3-1, lost one leg 0-1 so we won "the match" 3-2. So we're going to Wembley. Again. Pissed off to lose to such a wank rag team, but over all we did enough. Just! Just saying......

You’re referring to the tie. We won the tie, we lost the match.

Bluemoon4610 wrote:

Mase wrote:

Bluemoon4610 wrote:

carl_feedthegoat wrote:No Beefy...you said where did we get beat.....we lost the fuckign match...at home...again.

Unacceptable.

"The match" was played over 2 legs. We won one leg 3-1, lost one leg 0-1 so we won "the match" 3-2. So we're going to Wembley. Again. Pissed off to lose to such a wank rag team, but over all we did enough. Just! Just saying......

You’re referring to the tie. We won the tie, we lost the match.

Semantics......

mr_nool wrote:

Bluemoon4610 wrote:

Mase wrote:

Bluemoon4610 wrote:

carl_feedthegoat wrote:No Beefy...you said where did we get beat.....we lost the fuckign match...at home...again.

Unacceptable.

"The match" was played over 2 legs. We won one leg 3-1, lost one leg 0-1 so we won "the match" 3-2. So we're going to Wembley. Again. Pissed off to lose to such a wank rag team, but over all we did enough. Just! Just saying......

You’re referring to the tie. We won the tie, we lost the match.

Semantics......

You bloody antisemantic! Shame on you.

mr_nool wrote:

Bluemoon4610 wrote:

Mase wrote:

Bluemoon4610 wrote:

carl_feedthegoat wrote:No Beefy...you said where did we get beat.....we lost the fuckign match...at home...again.

Unacceptable.

"The match" was played over 2 legs. We won one leg 3-1, lost one leg 0-1 so we won "the match" 3-2. So we're going to Wembley. Again. Pissed off to lose to such a wank rag team, but over all we did enough. Just! Just saying......

You’re referring to the tie. We won the tie, we lost the match.

Semantics......

You bloody antisemantic! Shame on you.