The mancityfans.net football forum

No agenda, eh?

https://www.football365.com/news/clatte ... U_fcTFPwQQ

To me the whole integrity of that time us now up for question, indeed there should be an asterisk against all the trophies won during that time ( that is what the media narrative was during City’s FFP trial put a asterisk against city’s titles) well that should happen now, those titles were not won in a fair manner if refs are saying there was a bias towards the rags.

Harry Dowd scored wrote:To me the whole integrity of that time us now up for question, indeed there should be an asterisk against all the trophies won during that time ( that is what the media narrative was during City’s FFP trial put a asterisk against city’s titles) well that should happen now, those titles were not won in a fair manner if refs are saying there was a bias towards the rags.

It would be funny as fuck if the honours won were called into question. Fuck me, it would tip the old cunt over the edge, knighthood would have to go back.....

The lack of mainstream media coverage of Clattenbergs utterance shows how biased our mainstream media are.
Imagine if a ref had said that about City?

Blue Jam wrote:The lack of mainstream media coverage of Clattenbergs utterance shows how biased our mainstream media are.
Imagine if a ref had said that about City?

Front page! Plus a sensetionalised investigation.

Kippax Sean wrote:

Blue Jam wrote:The lack of mainstream media coverage of Clattenbergs utterance shows how biased our mainstream media are.
Imagine if a ref had said that about City?

Front page! Plus a sensetionalised investigation.

Der Spiegel or how the fuck are they called would have a wank fest.
UEFA would also investigate it just for the sake of it.

I believe all the top sports writers have got this and will be publishing their findings fairly soon.

Also, the in-depth look into serial cheating by The whole of the United set-up will closely follow.

Mark my words.

Remember a few years ago Neville was talking about referee corruption, Halsley iirc, and it was very quickly brushed under the carpet with the tag line of “move along, nothing to see here”

The same will happen here

I wonder if we've hired Clattenburg as a mouthpiece to expose the bias/favoritism involved in PIGMOL? Be funny as fuck if we have......

A side interesting note that I noticed about Klopp's reaction of late was this bit which made me think about the general love in for Klopp vs. Pep's gradual sense of distrust of the media's treatment of he and City:

“He is clearly getting edgy, though, because not since Fergie have we seen such a blatant attempt to influence a referee ahead of a big game. Klopp wasn’t doing this last season when Liverpool were winning every week.

“He does not like losing, he never has. He gets prickly.”

He hasn't really experienced a stretch like this since early days managing Liverpool when there were some calls to consider getting him out as I recall.

But it was a more clear transition period and he wasn't seen the same way as Pep, as some kind of assumed guaranteed miracle worker just yet.

Those expectations have I believe in part impacted Pep's treatment (other than feelings towards Liverpool and us, and tbf Pep's own general disdain for shallow questions from the media) and perhaps we are now seeing that maybe it's not just Pep with Klopp showing his own insecurities about being questioned and not getting results for a period.

What is fantastic is Clattencunt was part of this system.
As Hasley, Marriner, Eleray, Atkinson. All of them were bent as fuck.

Isnt Halsey the only ex ref not to have taken the money and signed the none disclose upon retiring?

And he's a City legend, 5 mins added time for nothing.