london blue 2 wrote:I’m done with watching him like a deer in the headlights. His lack of bottle on the big stage is too much for me any longer.
Mase wrote:But he is good for England still. So why is that? Lower class players around him for England making him look better? A proper striker for him to work off? There must be a reason.
Mase wrote:But he is good for England still. So why is that? Lower class players around him for England making him look better? A proper striker for him to work off? There must be a reason.
zuricity wrote:^^^^^
you can't compare the standard of international football to the level in the PL.
Mase wrote:zuricity wrote:^^^^^
you can't compare the standard of international football to the level in the PL.
True. Standard of opposition might help at international level.
brite blu sky wrote:Glad you started this thread Mase - was thinking the same.
The club have to bite the bullet and move him on. - That Argentinian kid can replace the threat value that roughly represents what Sterling is.
two things
1. Sterling was only ever capable of one thing - running fast at defenders and when on form getting past them. That is a real asset, no doubt about it.
2. He got away with it while not asked to do much more. But as he has been asked to pad out his role in the Pep system his shortcomings have surfaced in all too obvious fashion. They now outweigh the threat value.
Shortcomings
Can't receive the ball properly - often not ready, as in on the back foot or even surprised ffs.
First touch - no comment req.
Can't for the life of him make a first time pass on to even an obvious player near him. - As a lynchpin in the fwd mid position in attacks this is a critical failing as he stops the flow constantly and wastes golden opportunities to catch oppo on the back foot.
Seems to be unaware of his team mates around him half the time.
Constantly stops and again loses us momentum.
50% at least of through passes or attempted assists are way off the mark.
Poor decision making in general.
Can't take a 1 on 1 to save his career.
For me these are all based in a mental issue that he is thinking of something else and not what he needs to be thinking of. There is nothing wrong with his feet, but also he isn't going to correct these things and as we have all seen he becomes more of a liability than an asset in this team.
Mase wrote:brite blu sky wrote:Glad you started this thread Mase - was thinking the same.
The club have to bite the bullet and move him on. - That Argentinian kid can replace the threat value that roughly represents what Sterling is.
two things
1. Sterling was only ever capable of one thing - running fast at defenders and when on form getting past them. That is a real asset, no doubt about it.
2. He got away with it while not asked to do much more. But as he has been asked to pad out his role in the Pep system his shortcomings have surfaced in all too obvious fashion. They now outweigh the threat value.
Shortcomings
Can't receive the ball properly - often not ready, as in on the back foot or even surprised ffs.
First touch - no comment req.
Can't for the life of him make a first time pass on to even an obvious player near him. - As a lynchpin in the fwd mid position in attacks this is a critical failing as he stops the flow constantly and wastes golden opportunities to catch oppo on the back foot.
Seems to be unaware of his team mates around him half the time.
Constantly stops and again loses us momentum.
50% at least of through passes or attempted assists are way off the mark.
Poor decision making in general.
Can't take a 1 on 1 to save his career.
For me these are all based in a mental issue that he is thinking of something else and not what he needs to be thinking of. There is nothing wrong with his feet, but also he isn't going to correct these things and as we have all seen he becomes more of a liability than an asset in this team.
The running fast at defenders is a good point. In our centurion season we pelted teams - Sanè one side and Sterling on the other both running at teams 100 miles an hour. Pep seemed to change the way we played after that.
brite blu sky wrote:Mase wrote:brite blu sky wrote:Glad you started this thread Mase - was thinking the same.
The club have to bite the bullet and move him on. - That Argentinian kid can replace the threat value that roughly represents what Sterling is.
two things
1. Sterling was only ever capable of one thing - running fast at defenders and when on form getting past them. That is a real asset, no doubt about it.
2. He got away with it while not asked to do much more. But as he has been asked to pad out his role in the Pep system his shortcomings have surfaced in all too obvious fashion. They now outweigh the threat value.
Shortcomings
Can't receive the ball properly - often not ready, as in on the back foot or even surprised ffs.
First touch - no comment req.
Can't for the life of him make a first time pass on to even an obvious player near him. - As a lynchpin in the fwd mid position in attacks this is a critical failing as he stops the flow constantly and wastes golden opportunities to catch oppo on the back foot.
Seems to be unaware of his team mates around him half the time.
Constantly stops and again loses us momentum.
50% at least of through passes or attempted assists are way off the mark.
Poor decision making in general.
Can't take a 1 on 1 to save his career.
For me these are all based in a mental issue that he is thinking of something else and not what he needs to be thinking of. There is nothing wrong with his feet, but also he isn't going to correct these things and as we have all seen he becomes more of a liability than an asset in this team.
The running fast at defenders is a good point. In our centurion season we pelted teams - Sanè one side and Sterling on the other both running at teams 100 miles an hour. Pep seemed to change the way we played after that.
Sane was also a threat but didn't get played enough ( cos he lost the ball too much? ) and so made the excuse to go back home.
PeterParker wrote:
Not saying this is true, but this week I was looking at the pre-match vs Madrid on the local broadcaster and the moderator said that he went to Manchester for the Leicester game, 2019, in the business lounge and he was talking with people close to the club, or who are working here (he did not give names), but he said that they spoke about Sane and everyone knew he was going because "Pep did not like him".
The journo is in a small list of romanian sports people that I think are decent so I don't think he was lying.
Make what you want of it, but for me it changed a bit how Sane left.
brite blu sky wrote:PeterParker wrote:
Not saying this is true, but this week I was looking at the pre-match vs Madrid on the local broadcaster and the moderator said that he went to Manchester for the Leicester game, 2019, in the business lounge and he was talking with people close to the club, or who are working here (he did not give names), but he said that they spoke about Sane and everyone knew he was going because "Pep did not like him".
The journo is in a small list of romanian sports people that I think are decent so I don't think he was lying.
Make what you want of it, but for me it changed a bit how Sane left.
That would figure for me. Why would Pep not like him ? If he delivered as player and did what he was asked then any manager would learn to live with the personality of the player, im pretty sure of that.
He probs didn't like him because he refused to learn what Pep wanted and was petulant in response. Pep probably wrote him off, as attitude stops everything else.
brite blu sky wrote:brite blu sky wrote:PeterParker wrote:
Not saying this is true, but this week I was looking at the pre-match vs Madrid on the local broadcaster and the moderator said that he went to Manchester for the Leicester game, 2019, in the business lounge and he was talking with people close to the club, or who are working here (he did not give names), but he said that they spoke about Sane and everyone knew he was going because "Pep did not like him".
The journo is in a small list of romanian sports people that I think are decent so I don't think he was lying.
Make what you want of it, but for me it changed a bit how Sane left.
That would figure for me. Why would Pep not like him ? If he delivered as player and did what he was asked then any manager would learn to live with the personality of the player, im pretty sure of that.
He probs didn't like him because he refused to learn what Pep wanted and was petulant in response. Pep probably wrote him off, as attitude stops everything else.
In contrast Sterling probably has the right attitude completely for Pep - just can't actually turn that into practical improvement.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: city72, CTID Hants, Indianablue, salford city and 210 guests