The mancityfans.net football forum

Original Dub wrote:Not sure what you mean?

I don't think he planned that incident. Or planned to fuck us over. I do know he blew the whistle when he saw grealish through on goal.

I can't explain why.

I don't think it was an accident. You must know it was?

I just mean it would make more sense for it to be an act of cheating if he had committed similar acts earlier on for example when we were winning. I know that you've said ot wasn't necessary beforehand, but he could have put it to bed a lot sooner.

you mean, like all thr times throughout the match when a 50/50 call went in spurs favor every single time? or the bookings that should have gone to spurs players but didnt? or when he (and var) failed to award a pen for the foul on akanji?

the fact of the matter is that he DID influence the result earlier in the game. blowing the whistle when grealish was through on goal was a last second desperate move to preserve the result he had already helped to create.

Influence can be lots of small decisions throughout the game.

Answer this question, because we see this quite a lot every week with other teams.... the ref leans towards the home team When unsure...

When was the last time we had a "homer"?

When was the last time a referee seemed to give the 50/50 decisions our way?

Pep knows the score. He's referred to it plenty of times and not in the heat of the moment after a game. In press conferences when he's had time to think before he speaks.

We have always won in spite of the officials. Never because of them

Ok ok I don't really have any reason to disagree with any of the above, I just thought that on this occasion it was an honest mistake.

As an aside, the lad I work with supports a different team and he is 100% adamant that every marginal decision goes against his team, and whenever they play us we are given an easy rode by referees.

He sounds like a right cunt mate

Hooper is either bent, or, fucking useless, may I remind everyone, this is the ref that did not give a pen to Wolves at Old Toilet after Onana wiped out the Wolves forward. Even the rag shills admitted it was a pen, in the last minute of the game. Also Webb said it was a pen. So , mistake or cheating?

Original Dub wrote:He sounds like a right cunt mate

He's ok but a bit fanatical

Nicolas Jackson will face no FA charge for after game episode at Everton.
The referee saw the incident at the time and decided no action needed to be taken.

How many did Rodri get for something far less? 2 games?

PeterParker wrote:Nicolas Jackson will face no FA charge for after game episode at Everton.
The referee saw the incident at the time and decided no action needed to be taken.

How many did Rodri get for something far less? 2 games?

3 match ban - cost us 6 points which they thought it might. His hands never left the shoulder

johnny crossan wrote: 3 match ban - cost us 6 points which

Cheers.
To be fair Rodri almost killed him.

johnny crossan wrote:

PeterParker wrote:Nicolas Jackson will face no FA charge for after game episode at Everton.
The referee saw the incident at the time and decided no action needed to be taken.

How many did Rodri get for something far less? 2 games?

3 match ban - cost us 6 points which they thought it might. His hands never left the shoulder

Didn’t help Gibbs-White went down like a sack of shit

PeterParker wrote:

johnny crossan wrote: 3 match ban - cost us 6 points

Cheers.
To be fair Rodri almost killed him.

No mention of the Luton lads foul on Foden and whether a red card was deserved on RefWatch. Mustn't have happened

nottsblue wrote:

johnny crossan wrote:

PeterParker wrote:Nicolas Jackson will face no FA charge for after game episode at Everton.
The referee saw the incident at the time and decided no action needed to be taken.

How many did Rodri get for something far less? 2 games?

3 match ban - cost us 6 points which they thought it might. His hands never left the shoulder

Didn’t help Gibbs-White went down cos he's a sack of shit

Corrected for accuracy

nottsblue wrote:No mention of the Luton lads foul on Foden and whether a red card was deserved on RefWatch. Mustn't have happened

Very odd that one. Clear red card in today's rules

john@staustell wrote:

nottsblue wrote:No mention of the Luton lads foul on Foden and whether a red card was deserved on RefWatch. Mustn't have happened

Very odd that one. Clear red card in today's rules

Baffling that that wasn’t given as a red. Could have broken his leg!

A whole new level of WTAF?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67688071

CTID Hants wrote:A whole new level of WTAF?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67688071

Said it a few times, it was only a matter of time. Playing until one team scores is becoming the norm with Arsenal and Liverpool.

The difference between the reporting on our officiating compared to the cartel is truly mind blowing.

The narrative of "we all feel really bad for hooper" continues.
So, so weird

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/67697738

Original Dub wrote:The difference between the reporting on our officiating compared to the cartel is truly mind blowing.

The narrative of "we all feel really bad for hooper" continues.
So, so weird

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/67697738

Just seen Web you are right OD it’s Fookin mind boggling