The mancityfans.net football forum

I have a special folder with screenshots of posts from muppets that were over the moon when we were charged. Can’t wait to bring these out and inject the tears into my veins.

Please God let this be true

Prestwich Blue on twitter who is normally pretty good and close to the mark has said for a while it's basically 3 charges that have been elevated to over 100 and they haven't a leg to stand on. Apparently he's said the 4th charge which is the only one we might lose is the not co operating and I can't see much more than a small fine punishment for that.

stupot wrote:Prestwich Blue on twitter who is normally pretty good and close to the mark has said for a while it's basically 3 charges that have been elevated to over 100 and they haven't a leg to stand on. Apparently he's said the 4th charge which is the only one we might lose is the not co operating and I can't see much more than a small fine punishment for that.

We did cooperate though , eventually .

I honestly reckon , for the FA to save some face , that we will be fined (just like last time ) for not cooperating and that will give wankers like ‘failed club owner’ Simon Jordan ‘justification ‘ to say we were guilty of financial fair play rules all along .

Mase wrote:I have a special folder with screenshots of posts from muppets that were over the moon when we were charged. Can’t wait to bring these out and inject the tears into my veins.

Our club will still give these cunts VIP access to the lounge to feast on our VIO buffets during matches .

Pisses me off and they should be banned , period!

carl_feedthegoat wrote:

Mase wrote:I have a special folder with screenshots of posts from muppets that were over the moon when we were charged. Can’t wait to bring these out and inject the tears into my veins.

Our club will still give these cunts VIP access to the lounge to feast on our VIO buffets during matches .

Pisses me off and they should be banned , period!

We should have banned them years ago. They’ve been allowed to get away with it and have taken the piss.

OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?

sheblue wrote:OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?

That's what we should be suing over. Never mind banning the red shite media, just play them at their own silly game.
If and when we're cleared, then sue for defamation.

patrickblue wrote:

sheblue wrote:OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?

That's what we should be suing over. Never mind banning the red shite media, just play them at their own silly game.
If and when we're cleared, then sue for defamation.

If we sue for defamation there's a decent chance of a court order requiring disclosure and inspection of all of the relevant non-privileged documents (including emails, whatsapps etc.). Be like letting piranhas into the paddling pool.

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:

patrickblue wrote:

sheblue wrote:OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?

That's what we should be suing over. Never mind banning the red shite media, just play them at their own silly game.
If and when we're cleared, then sue for defamation.

If we sue for defamation there's a decent chance of a court order requiring disclosure and inspection of all of the relevant non-privileged documents (including emails, whatsapps etc.). Be like letting piranhas into the paddling pool.

Depends on what we've got to hide.

patrickblue wrote:

Dunne's Half-Time Pint wrote:

patrickblue wrote:

sheblue wrote:OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?

That's what we should be suing over. Never mind banning the red shite media, just play them at their own silly game.
If and when we're cleared, then sue for defamation.

If we sue for defamation there's a decent chance of a court order requiring disclosure and inspection of all of the relevant non-privileged documents (including emails, whatsapps etc.). Be like letting piranhas into the paddling pool.

Depends on what we've got to hide.

That's not the only reason to avoid nudist camps.

I remember when news of the charges first broke, Holt, Herbert and Deloony were all giving large, obviously presuming guilt, be fantastic if it all went away. They would get some stick.

Even the site of that Miguel delaney cunt boils my blood.

Miserable prick

If this is True the club should receive an apology from everyone who had already had us down as guilty . But I very much doubt they will . I remember one head line saying kick them out Cheats etc cant think which shite tabloid it was I picked it up when waiting for a chinese take away one night. Absolute filthy gutter snipes the lot of them.

It'll be another case of "oh you got away with it again, no smoke without fire etc etc"

I know the sponsors are an issue for the haters. However it’s telling not one has an issue with its relationship with the champions. The Premier League has been unbelievable successfull. The yank owned clubs want it, that’s the biggest issue facing English football, not our owners.

sheblue wrote:OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?

In my view there's clearly been a conspiracy against City regarding this, all along. We know who the main culprits are. Conspiracy is a serious crminal offence in Britain, if not elsewhere, so I'd have been reporting our evidence - which we surely have - to the police.

john@staustell wrote:

sheblue wrote:OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?

In my view there's clearly been a conspiracy against City regarding this, all along. We know who the main culprits are. Conspiracy is a serious crminal offence in Britain, if not elsewhere, so I'd have been reporting our evidence - which we surely have - to the police.

conspiracy
noun
a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.


It does require them to be somewhat secretive. It would be less obvious if they bought advertising space at the Etihad to announce their plan.

Slim wrote:

john@staustell wrote:

sheblue wrote:OK so, if this is true, what about the tarnishing of our reputation on a world stage.
Who pays for that?

In my view there's clearly been a conspiracy against City regarding this, all along. We know who the main culprits are. Conspiracy is a serious crminal offence in Britain, if not elsewhere, so I'd have been reporting our evidence - which we surely have - to the police.

conspiracy
noun
a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.


It does require them to be somewhat secretive. It would be less obvious if they bought advertising space at the Etihad to announce their plan.

v good