Nigels Tackle wrote:that one of foden on the ‘wembley express’ was properly embarrassing last night! an absolute waste of time, money and effort.
salford city wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:that one of foden on the ‘wembley express’ was properly embarrassing last night! an absolute waste of time, money and effort.
Speak for yourself . I'm sure there are a lot of Stockport based boys and girls who enjoyed that. I thought it was fine
Nigels Tackle wrote:salford city wrote:Nigels Tackle wrote:that one of foden on the ‘wembley express’ was properly embarrassing last night! an absolute waste of time, money and effort.
Speak for yourself . I'm sure there are a lot of Stockport based boys and girls who enjoyed that. I thought it was fine
it looked childish
blues2win wrote:The home atmosphere was really good last night.
salford city wrote:blues2win wrote:The home atmosphere was really good last night.
There can be no excuses for a chumps league quarter final but in the main it is wank and has been for some time. We've been spoilt for a long time and it shows in our home support
salford city wrote:blues2win wrote:The home atmosphere was really good last night.
There can be no excuses for a chumps league quarter final but in the main it is wank and has been for some time. We've been spoilt for a long time and it shows in our home support
Mase wrote:Need a banner of Kev and Haaland in bed together asleep
carolina-blue wrote::xMase wrote:Need a banner of Kev and Haaland in bed together asleep
carl_feedthegoat wrote:salford city wrote:blues2win wrote:The home atmosphere was really good last night.
There can be no excuses for a chumps league quarter final but in the main it is wank and has been for some time. We've been spoilt for a long time and it shows in our home support
The away fans are the most loyal and most vocal...always have been and always will be
Home support, as you point out , is fuckign embarrassing more often than not.
MIAMCFC wrote:salford city wrote:blues2win wrote:The home atmosphere was really good last night.
There can be no excuses for a chumps league quarter final but in the main it is wank and has been for some time. We've been spoilt for a long time and it shows in our home support
I say the same fans the norm is passive. Last night was decent.
Nick wrote:My mate said that but I thought it sounded loud
The issue is (me included for last night) real fans aren't going and are selling them to gimps
nottsblue wrote:MIAMCFC wrote:salford city wrote:blues2win wrote:The home atmosphere was really good last night.
There can be no excuses for a chumps league quarter final but in the main it is wank and has been for some time. We've been spoilt for a long time and it shows in our home support
I say the same fans the norm is passive. Last night was decent.
Asked early doors in the match thread if the atmosphere was there because it wasn’t coming through on TV. Of course, TNT could have something to do with it. And the second half was noticeably louder and singing more often.
When compared with the atmosphere at the start in Madrid or at Anfield or Milan or Dortmund with the flags and tiffo’s and noise it does make an inhospitable environment for the away side. We didn’t have that, or at least seem to and maybe this was why we started very slowly and were then on the back foot for most of the game. Massive difference to the same fixture a year ago and look how that panned out
And when we did score Madrid were shaken. It does affect players and we are not great at it
Indianablue wrote:Perhaps our fans get bored of the slow build up possession football, with few shots on goal against teams parking 10 men in defence. I know i do. The open game in Madrid was a far better watch. Fail to understand why we waste so many minutes trying to carve out an attempt on goal. We take relatively shots/attempts per minute of possession and at times its like watching paint dry. Away from home most teams are not parking the bus, games are a better watch our fans pro rata are more vociferous and more solid and make more noise
Bluemoon4610 wrote:Indianablue wrote:Perhaps our fans get bored of the slow build up possession football, with few shots on goal against teams parking 10 men in defence. I know i do. The open game in Madrid was a far better watch. Fail to understand why we waste so many minutes trying to carve out an attempt on goal. We take relatively shots/attempts per minute of possession and at times its like watching paint dry. Away from home most teams are not parking the bus, games are a better watch our fans pro rata are more vociferous and more solid and make more noise
This "we don't shoot" idea has been mentioned a lot, both here and in the match thread. But the stats tell a different story. We had 67% possession over the 120 minutes, so had the ball for approximately 80 minutes to Madrid's 40 minutes. We also had 33 attempts on goal in that time, which is one every two and a half minutes. Madrid had 8, or one every 5 minutes. And those times assume the ball is in play the whole time, which it isn't, meaning the minutes per attempt is actually lower than 2.5 minutes... so the argument doesn't stand up.
Bluemoon4610 wrote:Indianablue wrote:Perhaps our fans get bored of the slow build up possession football, with few shots on goal against teams parking 10 men in defence. I know i do. The open game in Madrid was a far better watch. Fail to understand why we waste so many minutes trying to carve out an attempt on goal. We take relatively shots/attempts per minute of possession and at times its like watching paint dry. Away from home most teams are not parking the bus, games are a better watch our fans pro rata are more vociferous and more solid and make more noise
This "we don't shoot" idea has been mentioned a lot, both here and in the match thread. But the stats tell a different story. We had 67% possession over the 120 minutes, so had the ball for approximately 80 minutes to Madrid's 40 minutes. We also had 33 attempts on goal in that time, which is one every two and a half minutes. Madrid had 8, or one every 5 minutes. And those times assume the ball is in play the whole time, which it isn't, meaning the minutes per attempt is actually lower than 2.5 minutes... so the argument doesn't stand up.
Return to The Maine Football forum
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], carolina-blue, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 169 guests