The mancityfans.net football forum

Are we selling short again?

Reports are Scouse will sell Elliott for 40-50 mil
City Extra reporter that Mcatee is evaluated at 25 mi, plus a buy back clause.

Sorry, but isn't he the U21 captain? One of the best young English players? In high demand by German sides?

If the scousers get £50m for Harvey fuckin Elliot, what we paid for Haaland, I'll give up watching football. Ridiculous

Mase wrote:If the scousers get £50m for Harvey fuckin Elliot, what we paid for Haaland, I'll give up watching football. Ridiculous

Saw something from a palace fan yesterday saying they should hold out for Elliott plus £50M for Guehi. Agree about Elliott who is is largely underwhelming. Still have a premium on scouse and red shite players for outbound transfers in the main although that is being tampered by teams pulling the red shite's pants down when they're buying

Can only assume the discrepancy is down to McAtee only having one year left on his contract whereas Elliott has two.

Plus, honestly, I think Elliott is the better player. Not by much, but still

nottsblue wrote:Can only assume the discrepancy is down to McAtee only having one year left on his contract whereas Elliott has two.

Plus, honestly, I think Elliott is the better player. Not by much, but still

the pair of them would be great for the likes of brentford, fulham, everton, leeds etc....

nottsblue wrote:Can only assume the discrepancy is down to McAtee only having one year left on his contract whereas Elliott has two.

Plus, honestly, I think Elliott is the better player. Not by much, but still

Not that I pay much attention to the cunts but hasn't he been a fairly regular player for a few seasons for them. So more experience prem than Mcatee?

CTID Hants wrote:

nottsblue wrote:Can only assume the discrepancy is down to McAtee only having one year left on his contract whereas Elliott has two.

Plus, honestly, I think Elliott is the better player. Not by much, but still

Not that I pay much attention to the cunts but hasn't he been a fairly regular player for a few seasons for them. So more experience prem than Mcatee?

Don't think he played much last season but he deffo has more PL experience

CTID Hants wrote:

nottsblue wrote:Can only assume the discrepancy is down to McAtee only having one year left on his contract whereas Elliott has two.

Plus, honestly, I think Elliott is the better player. Not by much, but still

Not that I pay much attention to the cunts but hasn't he been a fairly regular player for a few seasons for them. So more experience prem than Mcatee?

No mate. Started 2 Prem games for them last season, 1 less than McAtee

Mase wrote:

CTID Hants wrote:

nottsblue wrote:Can only assume the discrepancy is down to McAtee only having one year left on his contract whereas Elliott has two.

Plus, honestly, I think Elliott is the better player. Not by much, but still

Not that I pay much attention to the cunts but hasn't he been a fairly regular player for a few seasons for them. So more experience prem than Mcatee?

No mate. Started 2 Prem games for them last season, 1 less than McAtee

Mcatee has made 48 PL appearances
Elliott has made 94 PL appearances

nottsblue wrote:

Mase wrote:

CTID Hants wrote:

nottsblue wrote:Can only assume the discrepancy is down to McAtee only having one year left on his contract whereas Elliott has two.

Plus, honestly, I think Elliott is the better player. Not by much, but still

Not that I pay much attention to the cunts but hasn't he been a fairly regular player for a few seasons for them. So more experience prem than Mcatee?

No mate. Started 2 Prem games for them last season, 1 less than McAtee

Mcatee has made 48 PL appearances
Elliott has made 94 PL appearances

Sorry, I thought Hants said "playing regularly". I must have misread