Page 1 of 2

115

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2025 1:00 am
by Bear60
I know i know I should have found the original thread on this , but its late and i cant be arsed scrolling . I am fucking tired of it when is a decision going to be announced ffs I am fed up to the back teeth of dickheads and morons calling us cheats , if we are which i very much doubt hold or hands up and move on where ever that maybe , but if we are not cheats when the fuck am going be able to tell the morons to FUCK OFF

Re: 115

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2025 6:07 am
by john@staustell
Ah, we've missed those late night Bear posts :D

Re: 115

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2025 10:00 am
by Sparklehorse
Bear60 wrote:I know i know I should have found the original thread on this , but its late and i cant be arsed scrolling . I am fucking tired of it when is a decision going to be announced ffs I am fed up to the back teeth of dickheads and morons calling us cheats , if we are which i very much doubt hold or hands up and move on where ever that maybe , but if we are not cheats when the fuck am going be able to tell the morons to FUCK OFF

I feel exactly the same. I suspect the delay is the PL trying to work out how they can save face because if it was bad news for us I don’t think they could have waited this long to tell the world.

Re: 115

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2025 1:33 pm
by Blue Jam
115 what?

Re: 115

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2025 2:41 am
by Im_Spartacus
Bear60 wrote:I know i know I should have found the original thread on this , but its late and i cant be arsed scrolling . I am fucking tired of it when is a decision going to be announced ffs I am fed up to the back teeth of dickheads and morons calling us cheats , if we are which i very much doubt hold or hands up and move on where ever that maybe , but if we are not cheats when the fuck am going be able to tell the morons to FUCK OFF


Telling them to fuck off made no difference when the CAS judgement came out - it will make no difference when this one comes out.

This has been the gift that keeps giving for the clickbait press, there's no way they will change their stance or way of reporting between the lines afterwards - even if not guilty on all counts, there's no doubt in the eyes of the fuckwits who follow football, we are guilty. As you can see after the latest round of UEFA FFP fines where everyone is foaming at the mouth 'what about City' with zero recollection that CAS dismissed the charges other than non-cooperation.

My favourite one by far is where they say City paid off the PL / money talks etc..........without the slightest bit of thought that surely if the PL were open to bribes, the charges wouldn't ever have seen the light of day in the first place.

We're stuck with it I'm afraid

Re: 115

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2025 7:05 pm
by Blue Jam
100% this.
The cheats will always refer to us as cheats, regardless of rhe outcome.

Re: 115

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2025 7:14 pm
by carl_feedthegoat
Blue Jam wrote:100% this.
The cheats will always refer to us as cheats, regardless of rhe outcome.


And we will stick with ' we are Man City and we do what we like'

Re: 115

PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2025 11:44 am
by carl_feedthegoat
He completely dismantled Simon Jordan’s narrative—check from the 8-minute mark onward.
Seriously, is there a bigger broken record in football media than this cunt when it comes to Manchester City? Every time the mic’s on, out comes the magic phrase—“irrefutable evidence!”—like he’s waving a smoking gun that only he’s ever seen.

Wanker

Watch on youtube.com

Re: 115

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2025 3:18 pm
by nottsblue
Blue Jam wrote:100% this.
The cheats will always refer to us as cheats, regardless of rhe outcome.

100%
You only have to look at every single Have Your Say on any BBC football article and it ALWAYS comes up regardless of what the actual article was about.

Oil, 115, cheats, state owned, Emptihad, small club, no fans, no history.

Most of the general public are generally a bit thick. Regardless of the outcome, we are tarred for ever

Re: 115

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2025 4:42 pm
by carolina-blue
Yes the die is cast and we are tarred by the unwashed masses . Which is why when we are cleared of these lies .I wish we would go after the cunts we have nothing to lose .

Re: 115

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2025 7:47 pm
by Scatman
https://www.reddit.com/r/MCFC/comments/1m1iz64/real_talk_manchester_city_rumoured_verdict_on/

Whether this is true is obviously subject to doubt, but the highlight must be the third and fourth bullet.

Re: 115

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2025 8:04 pm
by Mase
Scatman wrote:https://www.reddit.com/r/MCFC/comments/1m1iz64/real_talk_manchester_city_rumoured_verdict_on/

Whether this is true is obviously subject to doubt, but the highlight must be the third and fourth bullet.


I can't see us even accepting a fine. We did that last time with Uefa and people still said, "but you were found guilty".

From what Khaldoon has said we won't accept anything but a not guilty verdict.

Id love for us to go after a few in the media though. That will be class.

Re: 115

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2025 8:13 pm
by Scatman
Mase wrote:
Scatman wrote:https://www.reddit.com/r/MCFC/comments/1m1iz64/real_talk_manchester_city_rumoured_verdict_on/

Whether this is true is obviously subject to doubt, but the highlight must be the third and fourth bullet.


I can't see us even accepting a fine. We did that last time with Uefa and people still said, "but you were found guilty".

From what Khaldoon has said we won't accept anything but a not guilty verdict.

Id love for us to go after a few in the media though. That will be class.


Yeah, and "a big fine" and a points deduction for not cooperating sounds like a load of tosh.

Re: 115

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2025 6:45 am
by sheblue
Scatman wrote:
Mase wrote:
Scatman wrote:https://www.reddit.com/r/MCFC/comments/1m1iz64/real_talk_manchester_city_rumoured_verdict_on/

Whether this is true is obviously subject to doubt, but the highlight must be the third and fourth bullet.


I can't see us even accepting a fine. We did that last time with Uefa and people still said, "but you were found guilty".

From what Khaldoon has said we won't accept anything but a not guilty verdict.

Id love for us to go after a few in the media though. That will be class.


Yeah, and "a big fine" and a points deduction for not cooperating sounds like a load of tosh.


We are not going to be 100% cleared of everything, they will have something and ive always felt we would get done on a technicality, i.e. providing info late, not co-operating on some stuff, dotting 'I's and crossing 'T' s. Personally i think it might not be very far from the truth.

Re: 115

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2025 7:52 am
by Scatman
sheblue wrote:
Scatman wrote:
Mase wrote:
Scatman wrote:https://www.reddit.com/r/MCFC/comments/1m1iz64/real_talk_manchester_city_rumoured_verdict_on/

Whether this is true is obviously subject to doubt, but the highlight must be the third and fourth bullet.


I can't see us even accepting a fine. We did that last time with Uefa and people still said, "but you were found guilty".

From what Khaldoon has said we won't accept anything but a not guilty verdict.

Id love for us to go after a few in the media though. That will be class.


Yeah, and "a big fine" and a points deduction for not cooperating sounds like a load of tosh.


We are not going to be 100% cleared of everything, they will have something and ive always felt we would get done on a technicality, i.e. providing info late, not co-operating on some stuff, dotting 'I's and crossing 'T' s. Personally i think it might not be very far from the truth.


Yes but a points deduction for it?

Re: 115

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2025 8:17 am
by PeterParker
Scatman wrote:
sheblue wrote:
Scatman wrote:
Mase wrote:
Scatman wrote:https://www.reddit.com/r/MCFC/comments/1m1iz64/real_talk_manchester_city_rumoured_verdict_on/

Whether this is true is obviously subject to doubt, but the highlight must be the third and fourth bullet.


I can't see us even accepting a fine. We did that last time with Uefa and people still said, "but you were found guilty".

From what Khaldoon has said we won't accept anything but a not guilty verdict.

Id love for us to go after a few in the media though. That will be class.


Yeah, and "a big fine" and a points deduction for not cooperating sounds like a load of tosh.


We are not going to be 100% cleared of everything, they will have something and ive always felt we would get done on a technicality, i.e. providing info late, not co-operating on some stuff, dotting 'I's and crossing 'T' s. Personally i think it might not be very far from the truth.


Yes but a points deduction for it?


I would gladly accept a 10-point deduction, not 3, if we are going to take the media and clubs to court.

Re: 115

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2025 8:25 am
by zuricity
I expect City to be exonerated of every charge. I expect City to bring charges against others for serious reputational damage.

Nothing else is acceptable.

Re: 115

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2025 8:57 am
by salford city
zuricity wrote:I expect City to be exonerated of every charge. I expect City to bring charges against others for serious reputational damage.

Nothing else is acceptable.


This and only this. A true watershed for our club. Either we are completely exonerated, or we take everyone through the courts until we are. No getting off with a slap on the wrists or suchlike. Full apologies followed by swift actions of serious and even, unrepairable reputation damage. We simply must come out of this entirely clean

Re: 115

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2025 11:46 am
by sheblue
salford city wrote:
zuricity wrote:I expect City to be exonerated of every charge. I expect City to bring charges against others for serious reputational damage.

Nothing else is acceptable.


This and only this. A true watershed for our club. Either we are completely exonerated, or we take everyone through the courts until we are. No getting off with a slap on the wrists or suchlike. Full apologies followed by swift actions of serious and even, unrepairable reputation damage. We simply must come out of this entirely clean


Love for you lads to be correct. But 100% exoneration seems unlikely.

Re: 115

PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2025 1:45 pm
by Indianablue
zuricity wrote:I expect City to be exonerated of every charge. I expect City to bring charges against others for serious reputational damage.

Nothing else is acceptable.


Its what i hope for and want but i am not expecting it. There will be a small charge we will be guilty of, in order to save some PL face. It will be this that all media twats will hang their hats on