Mase wrote:Crossie wrote:Lets hear what Chris Coleman has to say about our DOMINANT performance today.
"sheep.....sheep..........sheeeeeeeeeeeeeep! Errr....what was the question?"
Can't imagine Coleman pronouncing "dominant" properly.
Mase wrote:Crossie wrote:Lets hear what Chris Coleman has to say about our DOMINANT performance today.
"sheep.....sheep..........sheeeeeeeeeeeeeep! Errr....what was the question?"
john68 wrote:stevefromdonny wrote:i know we are winning easy but we have scored more against better teams then this rabble, we should of got atleast 5
You finished your crap yet....posh bastard:-)
john68 wrote:stevefromdonny wrote:i know we are winning easy but we have scored more against better teams then this rabble, we should of got atleast 5
You finished your crap yet....posh bastard:-)
Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
what the fuck are you on about?
Weirdo.
stevefromdonny wrote:john68 wrote:stevefromdonny wrote:i know we are winning easy but we have scored more against better teams then this rabble, we should of got atleast 5
You finished your crap yet....posh bastard:-)
if i had gone for a crap we would of won by more
PALUS wrote:How Blackburn have any points at all...
ruralblue wrote:PALUS wrote:How Blackburn have any points at all...
They have three FANTASTIC points that I am bloody glad they have!
guv111 wrote:Mase wrote:Crossie wrote:Lets hear what Chris Coleman has to say about our DOMINANT performance today.
"sheep.....sheep..........sheeeeeeeeeeeeeep! Errr....what was the question?"
Can't imagine Coleman pronouncing "dominant" properly.
TN Sub7 wrote:Niall Quinns Discopants wrote:
what the fuck are you on about?
Weirdo.
Read what it says
Mancio4ever wrote:I wonder what kind of threat the manager was looking at for not resting key players like Yaya and David after Sergio sealed the game!
not that withdrawing a wide man for a third holder isnt tactically wise, but f**k me, Rovers' only plan was to keep 9 men behind and hope for so rebound toward Yakoubu: first shot on target at 91:34....
Hope YT only got a knock.
Mancini out!
Mase wrote:Mancio4ever wrote:I wonder what kind of threat the manager was looking at for not resting key players like Yaya and David after Sergio sealed the game!
not that withdrawing a wide man for a third holder isnt tactically wise, but f**k me, Rovers' only plan was to keep 9 men behind and hope for so rebound toward Yakoubu: first shot on target at 91:34....
Hope YT only got a knock.
Mancini out!
BRUCE IN!!!
Tokyo Blue wrote:Mase wrote:Mancio4ever wrote:I wonder what kind of threat the manager was looking at for not resting key players like Yaya and David after Sergio sealed the game!
not that withdrawing a wide man for a third holder isnt tactically wise, but f**k me, Rovers' only plan was to keep 9 men behind and hope for so rebound toward Yakoubu: first shot on target at 91:34....
Hope YT only got a knock.
Mancini out!
BRUCE IN!!!
alright my loves?
halnone wrote:Did the rags really lose to this lot? Haha
Tokyo Blue wrote:Mase wrote:Mancio4ever wrote:I wonder what kind of threat the manager was looking at for not resting key players like Yaya and David after Sergio sealed the game!
not that withdrawing a wide man for a third holder isnt tactically wise, but f**k me, Rovers' only plan was to keep 9 men behind and hope for so rebound toward Yakoubu: first shot on target at 91:34....
Hope YT only got a knock.
Mancini out!
BRUCE IN!!!
alright my loves?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests