ant london wrote:I think you are missing the point that the OP is trying to bring out there KK
He's not saying (and I don't think anyone would ever say) that, in the heat of the match thread or immediate aftermath it isn't normal, justified or understandable to rant about someone who has played badly
What I was referring to (and I think was the OP's point) was the posts where people have a bee in their bonnet, axe to grind or whatever re a certain player and constantly bang on about it, getting more and more rabid in their criticism (often in my view with little basis). It is this kind of discussion that I think is dangerous and counterproductive.
I agree with you to a certain extent but, as Doug pointed out, these sort of posts are more often than not counter-balanced by other posters disagreeing with the offender and pointing out that they are talking bollocks. If I was Isaksson for example and saw that King Kev was slagging me of on ManCityFans but 10 others were sticking up for me then I wouldn't get too upset
(but I would still be a shit 'keeper)ant london wrote:I also don't buy the "players are too precious", "they are well compensated" bollocks. Well paid or not they are simply human beings, like you or I. I'd love to see some of you listen to some of this kind of criticism about your performance (let's just say at work....or in bed with your misses) and shrug it off....and continue to perform well knowing people are slating you constantly. If you think you could....I say you are delusional
It wasn't me that mentioned being well compensated so I won't bother to address that point.
As for players being too precious, I said
IF they are too precious then they should stay away. I'm sure we all know if we are likely to be upset by something or not, if we think that something may upset us they maybe we should avoid it.
ant london wrote:And the pub analogy is flawed too. Yes, post-match players would obviously avoid standing within earshot of a group of lads wearing City shirts obviously having a heated debate....they don't have the same luxury of being able to judge the group here. By the time they've opened a thread (or even seen the title) half the damage is done. Even if they avoided the forum after a defeat they would find the kind of witchhunt threads appearing....we even get them during international breaks when the players having even had chance to "offend" in a sky blue shirt
The pub analogy is just how I view this site, if you don't see it that way too I don't have a problem with that.
The luxury that the players do have is to chose if they visit internet forums where people will be talking about them or not. I hope that some of our players do care enough to come and see what the fans think, I also hope they are grown up enough to realise it is just people's
opinions and not necessarily the how we all feel.
ant london wrote:I'm not remotely saying that players should be insulated from criticism but the extent and tone of some of it is way over the top but more importantly potentially hugely counterproductive. A bit like the online equivalent of Richard Edghill being slated at Maine Road if you want an analogy...helped him didn't it
What happened with Edghill was appalling, I said that at the time. However there is a world of difference between morons booing him during a game and expressing their opinions on a forum.