City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrister

Here is the place to talk about all things city and football!

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby salford city » Fri Sep 13, 2024 12:10 pm

Bear60 wrote:Just fucking relegate us and throw us out of the league or whatever get it over and done with and then the Rags and fucking horrible dippers and the fucking media will have what they want and maybe then they will shut the fuck up. its getting on my tits listening to them arseholes all the time.


It is undoubtedly what they want why the fuck should we go along with it? Its fucking nonsense we all know it. They're a bunch of snide shithouses who cannot compete and they know it. They've tried everything within their powers (and most things not), I doubt that we would have acted if we didn't have a case. I know the PL cannot say the same - They've backed themselves into a red corner. Fuck the cunts
Your job is cleaning boots
salford city
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5905
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:21 pm

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby Nigels Tackle » Fri Sep 13, 2024 12:44 pm

rumours circulating that the sponsorship hearing last month with the pl has gone in our favour.... at least that we've scored a partial victory
ARMCHAIR FAN
Nigels Tackle
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18533
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: here, there, every fucking where
Supporter of: man love
My favourite player is: riyad meh!rez

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby Bear60 » Fri Sep 13, 2024 1:23 pm

salford city wrote:
Bear60 wrote:Just fucking relegate us and throw us out of the league or whatever get it over and done with and then the Rags and fucking horrible dippers and the fucking media will have what they want and maybe then they will shut the fuck up. its getting on my tits listening to them arseholes all the time.


It is undoubtedly what they want why the fuck should we go along with it? Its fucking nonsense we all know it. They're a bunch of snide shithouses who cannot compete and they know it. They've tried everything within their powers (and most things not), I doubt that we would have acted if we didn't have a case. I know the PL cannot say the same - They've backed themselves into a red corner. Fuck the cunts


Yea I know mate i am just sick of arseholes I work with gong on about it . we are living rent free in their heads
Image
Bear60
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:15 pm
Location: Oswestry
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: Colin Bell

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby salford city » Fri Sep 13, 2024 1:56 pm

Bear60 wrote:
salford city wrote:
Bear60 wrote:Just fucking relegate us and throw us out of the league or whatever get it over and done with and then the Rags and fucking horrible dippers and the fucking media will have what they want and maybe then they will shut the fuck up. its getting on my tits listening to them arseholes all the time.


It is undoubtedly what they want why the fuck should we go along with it? Its fucking nonsense we all know it. They're a bunch of snide shithouses who cannot compete and they know it. They've tried everything within their powers (and most things not), I doubt that we would have acted if we didn't have a case. I know the PL cannot say the same - They've backed themselves into a red corner. Fuck the cunts


Yea I know mate i am just sick of arseholes I work with gong on about it . we are living rent free in their heads



I know - that's the best part. I live in the heartlands of the watch em on the telly brigade most of the goons in the noddy tops could piss in their own sinks from the swamp but you will find them in the boozer watching every time they play. That said, I feel for those blues further afield who have to tolerate more of these goons than me
Your job is cleaning boots
salford city
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5905
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:21 pm

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby Bluemoon4610 » Fri Sep 13, 2024 2:58 pm

salford city wrote:
Bear60 wrote:Just fucking relegate us and throw us out of the league or whatever get it over and done with and then the Rags and fucking horrible dippers and the fucking media will have what they want and maybe then they will shut the fuck up. its getting on my tits listening to them arseholes all the time.


It is undoubtedly what they want why the fuck should we go along with it? Its fucking nonsense we all know it. They're a bunch of snide shithouses who cannot compete and they know it. They've tried everything within their powers (and most things not), I doubt that we would have acted if we didn't have a case. I know the PL cannot say the same - They've backed themselves into a red corner. Fuck the cunts

Amen brother. Destroy the cartel controlled cnut$
Bluemoon4610
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1824
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 10:01 pm
Location: Block 105 or County Durham
Supporter of: Manchester City
My favourite player is: Father Ruben

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby CTID Hants » Fri Sep 13, 2024 3:11 pm

Plastic cint of a rag that's never ever been to a United game (in his 50's)

Just said your lot are on trial Monday... told him to stop being a fucking sheep and asked if he knew difference between a hearing and a fucking trial, stupid fuckin cunt soon shut up
Born A Blue

Image
User avatar
CTID Hants
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Kaptain Kompany's Komposure
 
Posts: 14663
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:33 pm
Location: Farnborough, Hampshire

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby Bear60 » Fri Sep 13, 2024 5:26 pm

I work with two dippers and a rag and they were even saying Liverpool will be awarded titles etc etc fucking absolute dickheads .
Image
Bear60
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Rosler's Grandad Bombed The Swamp
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:15 pm
Location: Oswestry
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: Colin Bell

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby salford city » Sat Sep 14, 2024 6:49 am

The beeb have handily counted out all th.e 115 charges for the sheep today. Think this is the first time I've read this, 35 charges of failing to comply with a PL investigation. I'd like to see figures from the rest of the PL for the same period?There is no way we are not getting done for that- the rest is gravy that they won't be able to evidence so overall we will be 'guilty'. We should not agree with anything other than a full exoneration - fucking red shit scum
Your job is cleaning boots
salford city
Joe Hart's 29 Clean Sheets
 
Posts: 5905
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:21 pm

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby zuricity » Sat Sep 14, 2024 7:27 am

salford city wrote:The beeb have handily counted out all th.e 115 charges for the sheep today. Think this is the first time I've read this, 35 charges of failing to comply with a PL investigation. I'd like to see figures from the rest of the PL for the same period?There is no way we are not getting done for that- the rest is gravy that they won't be able to evidence so overall we will be 'guilty'. We should not agree with anything other than a full exoneration - fucking red shit scum



The 35 charges for failing to comply, is an opinion based charge. As Eric says to Andre Previn "I am playing all the right notes ! Not necessarily in the right order, i'll give you that ".

Besides they tally the charges, they do not detail every charge - again open to speculation.
"Well I'll go to the foot of our stairs."
zuricity
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18215
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Zuerich,ch

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby john@staustell » Sat Sep 14, 2024 9:17 am

zuricity wrote:
salford city wrote:The beeb have handily counted out all th.e 115 charges for the sheep today. Think this is the first time I've read this, 35 charges of failing to comply with a PL investigation. I'd like to see figures from the rest of the PL for the same period?There is no way we are not getting done for that- the rest is gravy that they won't be able to evidence so overall we will be 'guilty'. We should not agree with anything other than a full exoneration - fucking red shit scum



The 35 charges for failing to comply, is an opinion based charge. As Eric says to Andre Previn "I am playing all the right notes ! Not necessarily in the right order, i'll give you that ".

Besides they tally the charges, they do not detail every charge - again open to speculation.



Or as he called him - Mr Andrew Preview :D
“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”
User avatar
john@staustell
Roberto Mancini's Scarf
 
Posts: 20124
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:35 am
Location: St Austell
Supporter of: City

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby Mase » Sat Sep 14, 2024 10:45 am

Grealish should be charged with being bloody gorgeous
Mase
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 43780
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: The North Pole.
Supporter of: Warnock's Ref Rants
My favourite player is: Danny Tiatto

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby john@staustell » Sat Sep 14, 2024 10:54 am

Mase wrote:Grealish should be charged with being bloody gorgeous


Is your Mrs some sort of saint? Going on the piss to watch football on family holiday, bisexuality......... :D
“I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.”
User avatar
john@staustell
Roberto Mancini's Scarf
 
Posts: 20124
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:35 am
Location: St Austell
Supporter of: City

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby Mase » Sat Sep 14, 2024 11:13 am

john@staustell wrote:
Mase wrote:Grealish should be charged with being bloody gorgeous


Is your Mrs some sort of saint? Going on the piss to watch football on family holiday, bisexuality......... :D


:lol:

She deserves more than a medal for putting up with me!
Mase
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 43780
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: The North Pole.
Supporter of: Warnock's Ref Rants
My favourite player is: Danny Tiatto

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby Mase » Mon Sep 16, 2024 8:45 am

Laporte told The Daily Mail: “When I was there and the news broke, the sporting director and the CEO came and told all the players and staff that we can all be very calm because not one rule has been broken by Man City.”

“They told us everything was fine so that’s why we all think City will be fine. I don’t think there will be any issues.”
Mase
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 43780
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: The North Pole.
Supporter of: Warnock's Ref Rants
My favourite player is: Danny Tiatto

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby Nickyboy » Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:07 am

Talksport going into overdrive on their headlines about City paying Mancini an extra £2m a year via Al Jazeera and also paying Yaya Toure off the books (no other details about that one though)....

Talking about them as if they're facts - no mention that the Mancini contract with Al Jazeera predated his City one.

Obvious that they're putting in into peoples heads this happened and isn't 'alleged'
User avatar
Nickyboy
De Jong's Tackle
 
Posts: 1691
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Ramsbottom
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby carl_feedthegoat » Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:24 am

PeterParker wrote:
carl_feedthegoat wrote:
PeterParker wrote:For someone that knows fuck all about every detailed sub-note of the charges, like myself, what is the most logical outcome out of this?


We get done for non cooperation - nothing else will stick .


Meaning relegation? Point deduction? A large fee to be paid?


The latter
THEY SAY SWEARING IS DUE TO A LIMITED VOCABULARY. I KNOW THOUSANDS OF WORDS, BUT I STILL PREFER "FUCK OFF" TO "GO AWAY"
carl_feedthegoat
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Anna Connell's Vision
 
Posts: 32077
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 2:51 am
Supporter of: Man City

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby Hazy2 » Mon Sep 16, 2024 10:15 am

Pretty sure this was going to be a media free battlefield.
Hazy2
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9608
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:34 am
Supporter of: MCFC
My favourite player is: Silva

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby Nigels Tackle » Mon Sep 16, 2024 10:20 am

would be hilarious if we went unbeaten in the league, won the league and fa cups and then crowned things off with the chumps league and world club cup trophies in the summer
ARMCHAIR FAN
Nigels Tackle
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Allison's Big Fat Cigar
 
Posts: 18533
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: here, there, every fucking where
Supporter of: man love
My favourite player is: riyad meh!rez

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby johnny crossan » Mon Sep 16, 2024 10:26 am

City preparing energetically for our fixtures in the NW Counties League (filmed Friday)
Watch on youtube.com
Image
User avatar
johnny crossan
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Bert Trautmann's Neck
 
Posts: 12216
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 8:25 am
Location: The Barcelona of The North
Supporter of: City
My favourite player is: Merlin

Re: City Launch Legal Challenge Against PL Charges & Barrist

Postby Im_Spartacus » Mon Sep 16, 2024 10:27 am

zuricity wrote:I doubt very much that City have failed to co-operate.

The PL might not like what they have been given, that does not mean we have not co-operated.


I agree with this - the question is whether we have been obstructive or whether there's a legal aspect - I perceive at least one major problem in this particular case is that it involves third parties, and although the third parties may all ultimately be owned by the same person, these entities still have rights under the relevant contractual agreements for data not to be shared without consent etc.

So it would make me laugh if through all this, it wasn't city being obstructive, but the sponsors - and there's fuck all the PL could do about that if the confidentiality agreement city are bound by with Etisalat / Etihad etc prevents certain things from being shared.
Image
Im_Spartacus
Donated to the site
Donated to the site
Denis Law's Backheel
 
Posts: 9555
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: Abu Dhabi
Supporter of: .

PreviousNext

Return to The Maine Football forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: city72, CTID Hants, Mase, nottsblue, Paul68, Scatman and 273 guests